Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

From Problems to Barriers: A Bottom-Up Perspective on the Institutional Framing of a Labour Activation Programme

  • Helle Cathrine Hansen (a1)

Abstract

Human resource development (HRD) approaches aim to increase service users’ labour market prospects through training and upskilling. However, research on activation policy implementation suggests that individualised, tailored measures may be difficult to implement because of organisational structures, standardised procedures, contradictory professional interests, and broad framework laws. This qualitative study explored the institutional framing of the Norwegian Qualification Programme and how that framing created barriers in service users’ trajectories towards labour market inclusion. The study applied a bottom-up perspective to analyse how these barriers are entangled in a multidimensional web of interrelated and sometimes contradictory relations. Highlighting the service users’ perspective, the study aimed to examine how institutional framing may interfere with the activation policy goal of qualifying service users for the labour market. The results point to how institutional framing governs local practice and creates barriers that ultimately may impede activation policy goals.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Andreassen, T. A. and Fossestøl, K. (eds.) (2011) Nav Ved et Veiskille. [Nav at a Crossroad], Oslo: Gyldendal.
Bengtsson, M. (2014) ‘Towards standby-ability: Swedish and Danish activation policies in flux,’ International Journal of Social Welfare, 23, 5470
Brodkin, E. (2013) ‘Street-level organisations and the welfare state’, in Brodkin, E., and Marston, G. (eds.) Work and the Welfare State. Street-Level Organizations and Workfare Politics, Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 1734.
Brodkin, E. and Majmundar, M. (2010) ‘Administrative exclusion: organisations and the hidden costs of welfare claiming’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 4, 827–48.
Caswell, D. (2006) Handlingsmuligheder i social arbejde– et casestudie om kommunalfrontlinjepraksis på beskæftigelsesområdet, PhD-avhandling, Roskilde Universitet og Afk-forlaget.
Caswell, D., Kupka, P., Larsen, F. and van Berkel, R. (2017) ‘The frontline delivery of welfare-to-work in context’, in van Berkel, R., Caswell, D., Kupka, P., and Larsen, F. (eds.), Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe, New York: Routledge, 111.
Eskelinen, L., Olesen, S. and Caswell, D. (2008) Potentialer I sosicalt arbejde. Et konstruktivt blikk på faglig praksis, København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Fossestøl, K., Breit, E. and Borg, E. (2016a) ‘Hvorfor lykkes ikke NAV-kontorene med å jobbe mer arbeidsrettet?’, Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 33, 1/2, 423.
Fossestøl, K., Berg, H., Borg, E., Gleinsvik, A., Maximova-Mentzoni, T. and Pedersen, E. (2016b) Idealer og Realiteter i Forvaltningen av Arbeidsrettede Tiltak i NAV [Ideals and Realities in Administration of Employment-oriented Measures in NAV], Oslo: Work Research Institute.
Fuertes, V. and Lindsay, C. (2016) ‘Personalization and street-level practice in activation: the case of the UK’s work programme’, Public Administration, 94, 2, 526–41.
Gubrium, E. (2014) ‘Participant meaning-making along the work-trajectory of a labour activation programme’, in Gubrium, J., and Järvinen, M. (eds.), Turning Troubles into Problems: Clientization in Human Services, London: Routledge, 137–54.
Gubrium, E., Harsløf, I. and Lødemel, I. (2014) ‘Norwegian activation reform on a wave of wider welfare state changes’, in Lødemel, I., and Moreira, A. (eds.), Activation or Workfare: Governance and the Neo-liberal Convergence, New York: Oxford University Press, 1946.
Halvorsen, R. and Jensen, P. (2004) ‘Activation in Scandinavian welfare policy’, European Societies, 6, 4, 461–83.
Hansen, H. C. (2018) ‘Recognition and gendered identity constructions in labour activation’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 27, 2, 186–96.
Hansen, H. C. and Natland, S. (2017) ‘The working relationship between social worker and service user in an activation policy context’, Nordic Social Work Research, 7, 2, 101–14.
Hupe, P. and Hill, M. (2007) ‘Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability’, Public Administration, 85, 2, 279–99.
Jacobsson, K., Hollertz, K. and Garsten, C. (2017) ‘Local worlds of activation: the diverse pathways of three Swedish municipalities’, Nordic Social Work Research, 7, 2, 86100.
Linell, P. (1998) Approaching Dialogue, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lipsky, M. (2010) Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Lødemel, I. and Moreira, A. (eds.) (2014) Activation or Workfare: Governance and the Neo-liberal Convergence, New York: Oxford University Press.
Malmberg-Heimonen, I., Natland, S., Tøge, A. G. and Hansen, H. C. (2016) ‘The effects of a skill-training program for social workers’, British Journal of Social Work, 46, 5, 1354–71
McCoy, L. (2006) ‘Keeping the institution in view: working with interview accounts of everyday experience’, in Smith, D. (ed.), Institutional Ethnography as Practice, Oxford: Rownman and Littlefield, 109–25.
Newman, J. (2007) ‘The “double dynamics” of activation’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27, 9/19, 364–75.
Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security (2012) Circular to the Act on an Introductory Programme and Norwegian Language Training for Newly Arrived Immigrants, Circular Q-20/2012, Oslo: Ministry of Justice and Public Security.
Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Inclusion (2006–2007a) Work, Welfare and Inclusion, Parliamentary Report 9, Oslo: Ministry of Labour and Inclusion.
Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Inclusion (2006–2007b) Concerning the Act Changes to the Social Welfare Services Law and Individual Other Acts, Parliamentary Proposition 70, Oslo: Ministry of Labour and Inclusion.
Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2009) The Social Services Act, Oslo: Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare.
Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2011) Regulations Concerning Qualification Program and Qualification Benefit, Oslo: Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare.
Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2012) Directive 35 Concerning the Social Services Act, Oslo: Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare.
Nothdurfter, U. (2016) ‘The street-level delivery of activation policies: constraints and possibilities for a practice of citizenship’, European Journal of Social Work, 19, 3/4, 420–40.
Oslo Kommune (2017) ‘The staff in kindergardens’, www.oslo.kommune.no/barnehage/kvalitet-i-oslobarnehagen/personalet-i-barnehagene [accessed 15.01.2017].
Raeymaeckers, P. and Dierckx, D. (2013) ‘To work or not to work? The role of the organisational context for social workers’ perceptions on activation’, British Journal of Social Work, 43, 1170–89.
Røysum, A. (2009) ‘Ulike forståelser av helhetlig oppfølging i NAV?’ [‘Different understandings of comprehensive follow-up in NAV’], Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning [Journal of Welfare Research], 12, 3, 192206.
Røysum, A. (2013) ‘The reform of the welfare services in Norway: one office—one way of thinking?’, European Journal of Social Work, 16, 5, 708–23.
Schafft, A. and Spjelkavik, Ø. (2011) Evaluering av Kvalifiseringsprogrammet. Sluttrapport. [Evaluation of the Qualification Program. Final Report], Oslo: Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet (AFI) and Work Research Institute (WRI).
Skjefstad, N. (2013) ‘Er det rom for sosialt arbeid i Nav?’, Fontene forskning 1: 7688.
Thorén, K. H. (2008) Activation Policy in Action. A Street-Level Study of Social Assistance in the Swedish Welfare State, doctoral dissertation, Groningen: Växjö University Press.
Townsend, E. (1996) ‘Institutional ethnography: a method for showing how the context shapes practice’, Occupation, Participation and Health, 16, 3, 179–99.
Valkenburg, B. (2007) ‘Individualising activation services: trashing out an ambiguous concept’, in van Berkel, R., and Valkenburg, B. (eds.), Making It Personal. Individualising Activation Services in the EU, Bristol, UK: The Policy Press, 2543.
van Berkel, R. and Van der Aa, P. (2012) ‘Activation work: policy programme administration or professional service provision?’, Journal of Social Policy, 41, 3, 493510.
van Berkel, R., Caswell, D., Larsen, F. and Kupka, P. (eds.) (2017) Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe, New York: Routledge.
Wel, K., Dahl, E., Lødemel, I., Løyland, B., Naper, S. O. and Slagsvold, M. (2006) Funksjonsevne Blant Langtidsmottakere av Sosialhjelp [Long-time Social Welfare Recepients’ Functioning Capacity], Report No. 29, Oslo: Høgskolen i Oslo/Oslo University College.
Wright, S. (2013) ‘On activation workers’ perceptions: a reply to Dunn’, Journal of Social Policy, 42, 4, 829–37.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed