Skip to main content
×
Home

‘Getting with the (troubled families) programme’: a review

  • Michael Lambert (a1) and Stephen Crossley (a2)
Abstract

The commitment of the appointed Director General of the Troubled Families Unit, Louise Casey, that the Troubled Families Programme (TFP) was ‘an opportunity not to repeat the failed attempts of the past’ masks several enduring continuities (Casey, 2012: 3). This review article argues that the TFP should be seen as part of a wider spectrum of policies which locates ‘troubles’ or ‘problems’ in the family itself and emphasises behaviour as the target of action without regard to wider social or economic considerations. This policy process must be understood within a wider context of not only historical efforts ‘to constrain the redistributive potential of state welfare’ (Macnicol, 1987: 316) but also of contemporary forms of neoliberal governance of ‘the family’ (Butler, 2014; Crossley, 2016a; Gillies, 2014).

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      ‘Getting with the (troubled families) programme’: a review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      ‘Getting with the (troubled families) programme’: a review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      ‘Getting with the (troubled families) programme’: a review
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Ball E., Batty E. and Flint J. (2016) ‘Intensive family intervention and the problem of figuration of “Troubled Families”’, Social Policy and Society, 15, 2, 263–74.
Beatty C. and Fothergill S. (2013) Hitting the Poorest Places Hardest: The Local and Regional Impact of Welfare Reform, CRESR, Sheffield Hallam University.
Beatty C. and Fothergill S. (2016) The Uneven Impact of Welfare Reform: The Financial Losses to Places and People, CRESR, Sheffield Hallam University.
Beddoe L. (2014) ‘Feral families, troubled families: the rise of the underclass in New Zealand 2011–2013’, New Zealand Sociology, 29, 3, 5168.
Bond-Taylor S. (2015) ‘Dimensions of family empowerment in work with so-called “Troubled Families”’, Social Policy and Society, 14, 3, 371–84.
Bond-Taylor S. and Somerville P. (2013) Evaluation of Families Working Together, Lincoln: University of Lincoln.
Brown G. E. (1968) The Multi-problem Dilemma: A Social Research Demonstration with Multi-problem Families, Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
Brown M. and Madge N. (1982) Despite the Welfare State, London: Heinemann.
Burney E. (2008) Making People Behave: Anti-social Behaviour, Politics and Policy, Cullompton: Willan.
Butler I. (2014) ‘New families, new governance and old habits’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36, 4, 415–25.
Burchardt T. (2005) ‘Selective inclusion: asylum seekers and other marginalised groups’, in Hills J. and Stewart K. (eds.), A More Equal Society, Bristol: Policy Press, 209–28.
Cameron D. (2011) ‘Troubled families speech’, 15 December, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/troubled-families-speech [accessed 21.03.2016].
Cameron D. (2014) ‘Speech at the Relationships Alliance Summit’, 18 August, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/david-cameron-on-families [accessed 3 November 2015].
Cameron D. (2016) ‘Prime Minister's speech on life chances’, 11 January 2016, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/prime-ministers-speech-on-life-chances [accessed 11 May 2016].
Casey L. (2012) Listening to Troubled Families, London: DCLG.
Churchill H. (2011) Parental Rights and Responsibilities: Analysing Social Policy and Lived Experiences, Bristol: Policy Press.
Clarke J. and Newman J. (2012) ‘The alchemy of austerity’, Critical Social Policy, 32, 3, 299319.
Cook C. (2016) ‘Troubled families report ‘suppressed’’, 8 August, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37010486.
Crossick G. (1991) ‘From gentlemen to the residuum: languages of social description in Victorian Britain’, in Corfield P. J. (ed.), Language, History and Class, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 150–78.
Crossley S. (2015) ‘The Troubled Families Programme: the prefect social policy?’, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, Briefing 13, http://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/The%20Troubled%20Families%20Programme%2C%20Nov%202015.pdf [accessed 21.03.2016].
Crossley S. (2016a) ‘“Realising the (troubled family)”, “crafting the neoliberal state”’, Families, Relationship and Societies, 5, 2, 263–79.
Crossley S. (2016b) ‘The Troubled Families Programme: in, for and against the state?’, in Fenger M., Hudson J. and Needham C. (eds.), Social Policy Review 28: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.
Davies K. (ed.) (2015) Social Work with Troubled Families: A Critical Introduction, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
De Regt A. (1982) ‘Unacceptable families: on the origins of social maladjustment’, Netherlands Journal of Sociology, 18, 139–56.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2012) Working with Troubled Families, London: DCLG.
Dillane J., Hill M., Bannister J. and Scott S. (2001) Evaluation of the Dundee Families Project, Edinburgh: Stationery Office.
Fairclough N. (2000) New Labour, New Language?, London: Routledge.
Garrett P. (2007) ‘“Sinbin” solutions: the “pioneer” projects for “problem families” and the forgetfulness of social policy research’, Critical Social Policy, 27, 2, 203–30.
Geismar L. L. and LaSorte M. A. (1964) Understanding the Multi-problem Family, New York: Association Press.
Gillies V. (2012) ‘Personalising poverty: parental determinism and the “Big Society” agenda’, in Atkinson W., Roberts S. and Savage M. (eds.), Class Inequality in Austerity Britain, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 90110.
Gillies V. (2014) ‘Troubling families: parenting and the politics of early intervention’, in Wagg S. and Pilcher J. (eds.), Thatcher's Grandchildren?, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 204–24.
Gregg D. (2010) Family Intervention Projects: A Classic Case of Policy-based Evidence, London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
Gregg D. (2015) Troubled Families: State Lies, Demonization and Voodoo Social Engineering, Wirral: Green Man Books.
Hayden C. and Jenkins C. (2014) ‘“Troubled Families” Programme in England: “Wicked problems” and policy-based evidence’, Policy Studies, 35, 6, 631–49.
Hill J. (2006) ‘Does a focus on social exclusion change the policy response?’, in Hills J., le Grand J. and Piachaud D. (eds.), Understanding Social Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hope C. and Winnett R. (2012) ‘Downing Street: broadest shoulders must carry tax burden’, The Telegraph, 9 January, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/tax/9002198/Downing-Street-broadest-shoulders-must-carry-tax-burden.html [accessed 21.03.2016].
Innes D. and Tetlow G. (2015) ‘Central cuts, local decision-making: changes in local government spending and revenues in England, 2009–10 to 2014–15’, IFS Briefing Note BN166, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Join-Lambert H. (2016) ‘Parental involvement and multi-agency support services for high-need families in France’, Social Policy and Society, 15, 2, 317–29.
Jones C. (2001) ‘Voices from the front line: state social workers and New Labour’, British Journal of Social Work, 31, 4, 547–62.
Jones G. (1986) Social Hygiene in Twentieth Century Britain, London: Croom Helm.
Jordan B. and Jordan C. (2000) Social Work and the Third Way: Tough Love as Social Policy, London: SAGE.
Labrum B. (2004) ‘Developing “the essentials of good citizenship and responsibilities” in Maori women: family life, social change and the state in New Zealand, 1944–70’, Journal of Family History, 29, 4, 446–65.
Levitas R. (1998) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour, London: Macmillan.
Levitas R. (2012) ‘There may be “trouble” ahead: what we know about those 120,000 troubled families’, Poverty and Social Exclusion, http://www.poverty.ac.uk/policy-response-working-papers-families-social-policy-life-chances-children-parenting-uk-government [accessed 15.03.2014].
Lipsky M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lundqvist A. (2015) ‘Parenting support in Sweden: new policies in old settings’, Social Policy and Society, 14, 4, 657–68.
Macnicol J. (1986) ‘The effect of the evacuation of schoolchildren on official attitudes to state intervention’, in Smith H. (ed.), War and Social Change, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 331.
Macnicol J. (1987) ‘In pursuit of the underclass’, Journal of Social Policy, 16, 3, 293318.
Macnicol J. (1989) ‘Eugenics and the campaign for voluntary sterilization in Britain between the wars’, Social History of Medicine, 2, 2, 147–70.
Macnicol J. (1998) ‘Perspectives on the idea of an underclass’, in Edwards J. and Revauger J.-P. (eds.), Discourse on Inequality in France and Britain, Aldershot: Ashgate, 161–74.
Martin C. (2015) ‘Parenting support in France: policy in an ideological battlefield’, Social Policy and Society, 14, 4, 609–20.
Mazumdar P. M. H. (1980) ‘The eugenists and the residuum: the problem of the urban poor’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 54, 2, 204–15.
Morris L. (1994) Dangerous Classes: The Underclass and Social Citizenship, London: Routledge.
Morris K. (2013) ‘Troubled families: vulnerable families’ experiences of multiple service use’, Child and Family Social Work, 18, 2, 198206.
Murray C. (1990) The Emerging British Underclass, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Murray C. (1994) The Underclass: The Crisis Deepens, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Murray C. (2000) Underclass +10: Charles Murray and the British Underclass, 1990–2000, Trowbridge: Civitas.
Nasiali M. (2012) ‘Ordering the disorderly slum: “standardising” quality of life in Marseille tenements and bidonvilles, 1953–1962’, Journal of Urban History, 38, 6, 1021–35.
Nixon J., Parr S., Hunter C., Myers S., Sanderson D. and Whittle S. (2006) Anti-social Behaviour Intensive Family Support Projects: An Evaluation of Six Pioneering Projects, London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Nixon J., Pawson H. and Sosenko F. (2010) ‘Rolling out anti-social behaviour families projects in England and Scotland: analysing the rhetoric and practice of policy transfer’, Social Policy and Administration, 44, 3, 305–23.
O'Connor A. (2001) Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy and the Poor in Twentieth Century US History, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ostner I. and Stolberg C. (2015) ‘Investing in children, monitoring parents: parenting support in the changing German welfare state’, Social Policy and Society, 14, 4, 621–32.
Parr S. (2009) ‘Family intervention projects: a site of social work practice’, British Journal of Social Work, 39, 7, 1256–73.
Parr S. (2011a) ‘Family policy and the governance of anti-social behaviour in the UK: women's experiences of intensive family support’, Journal of Social Policy, 40, 4, 717–37.
Parr S. (2011b) ‘Intensive family casework with “problem families”: past and present’, Family Science, 2, 4, 240–9.
Parr S. and Nixon J. (2009) ‘Family intervention projects: sites of subversion and resilience’, in Barnes M. and Prior D. (eds.), Subversive Citizens, Bristol: Policy Press.
Read J. (2015) ‘Transformation and regulation: a century of continuity in nursery school and welfare policy rhetoric’, Journal of Education Policy, 30, 1, 3961.
Respect Task Force (RTF) (2006) Respect Action Plan, London: Home Office.
Rutter M. and Madge N. (1976) Cycles of Disadvantage, London: Heinemann.
Schleisinger B. (ed.) (1970), The Multi-problem Family: A Review and Annotated Bibliography, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Sefton T. and Sutherland H. (2005) ‘Inequality and poverty under New Labour’, in Hills J. and Stewart K. (eds.), A More Equal Society, Bristol: Policy Press, 231–50.
Social Exclusion Task Force (SETF) (2007) Families at Risk: Background on Families with Multiple Disadvantages, London: Cabinet Office.
Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) (2004) Breaking the Cycle: Taking Stock of Progress and Priorities for the Future, London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Starkey P. (2000a) Families and Social Workers: The Family Service Units, 1940–1985, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Starkey P. (2000b) ‘The feckless mother: women, poverty and social workers in wartime and post-war England’, Women's History Review, 9, 3, 539–57.
Stedman-Jones G. (1984) Outcast London: A Study in the Relationship Between Classes in Victorian Society (2nd edn), Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Taylor B. and Rogaly B. (2007) ‘“Mrs Fairly is a dirty, lazy type”: unsatisfactory households and the problem of problem families in Norwich, 1942–1963’, Twentieth Century British History, 18, 4, 429–52.
Taylor-Gooby P. (2012) UK Heading for Bottom Place on Public Spending, http://www.poverty.ac.uk/articles-government-cuts-international-comparisons-publicspending-whats-new/uk-heading-bottom-place [accessed 03.11.2015].
Thoburn J., Cooper N., Brandon M. and Connolly S. (2013) ‘The place of “Think Family” approaches in child and family social work: messages from a process evaluation of an English pathfinder service’, Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 2, 228–36.
Todd S. (2014) ‘Family welfare and social work in post-war England, c. 1948–1970’, English Historical Review, 129, 537, 362–87.
Van Wel F. (1992) ‘A century of families under supervision in the Netherlands’, British Journal of Social Work, 22, 2, 147–66.
Wacquant L. (2002) ‘Scrutinizing the street: poverty, morality, and the pitfalls of urban ethnography’, American Journal of Sociology, 107, 6, 1468–532.
Welshman J. (1999) ‘Evacuation, hygiene and social policy: the Our Towns report of 1943’, Historical Journal, 42, 3, 781807.
Welshman J. (2006) ‘The concept of the unemployable’, Economic History Review, 59, 3, 578606.
Welshman J. (2008) ‘Recuperation, rehabilitation and the residential option: the Brentwood Centre for mothers and children’, Twentieth Century British History, 19, 4, 502–29.
Welshman J. (2012) From Transmitted Deprivation to Social Exclusion: Policy, Poverty and Parenting, Bristol: Policy Press.
Welshman J. (2013) Underclass: A History of the Excluded Since 1880 (2nd edn), London: Bloomsbury.
White C., Warrener M., Reeves A. and La Valle I. (2008) Family Intervention Projects: An Evaluation of their Design, Set-up and Early Outcomes, London: National Centre for Social Research.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 96
Total number of PDF views: 434 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1174 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.