Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Wistow, Gerald Kalita, Anuska and Mondal, Shinjini 2012. Role of innovative institutional structures in integrated governance. Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 26, Issue. 6, p. 758.


    KJAER, ANNE METTE 2011. RHODES' CONTRIBUTION TO GOVERNANCE THEORY: PRAISE, CRITICISM AND THE FUTURE GOVERNANCE DEBATE. Public Administration, Vol. 89, Issue. 1, p. 101.


    Cheung, Anthony B. L. 2009. A Response to “Building Administrative Capacity for the Age of Rapid Globalization: A Modest Prescription for the Twenty-First Century”. Public Administration Review, Vol. 69, Issue. 6, p. 1034.


    DAVIES, JONATHAN S. 2009. THE LIMITS OF JOINED-UP GOVERNMENT: TOWARDS A POLITICAL ANALYSIS. Public Administration, Vol. 87, Issue. 1, p. 80.


    Minnery, John 2007. Stars and their Supporting Cast: State, Market and Community as Actors in Urban Governance. Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 325.


    ×

Governance and Collaboration: Review Article

  • Catherine Durose (a1) and Kirstein Rummery (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S147474640500299X
  • Published online: 26 April 2006
Abstract

Rod Rhodes (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Open University Press 1997.

Gerry Stoker (1998) ‘Governance as theory: five propositions’, International Journal of Social Sciences 50, 1, 17–28.

Helen Sullivan and Chris Skelcher (2002) Working across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services, Palgrave.

Janet Newman, Marion Barnes, Helen Sullivan, and A. Knops (2004) ‘Public participation and collaborative governance’, Journal of Social Policy 33, 203–223.

From a term used largely within political science in the mid-1990s, ‘governance’ has become a key conceptual and analytical convention adopted by social policy, largely because of its usefulness in examining questions that are key to the discipline: citizenship; welfare rights and responsibilities; accountability; legitimacy and partnership working. Clarence and Painter (1998) have constructed a useful characterisation of public policy, identifying a shift in emphasis from hierarchies, to markets and now to collaboration. Networks, ‘joined up’ governance and partnership working are now central in both policy practice and analysis. These processes are not new, but New Labour have clearly expanded and accelerated them. For New Labour, collaborative working is now perceived as central in their response to key policy challenges: improving public services, tackling social exclusion and revitalising local democracy. These processes are now evident at all levels of policy making from supranational organisations such as the European Union down to neighbourhood-based initiatives. It appears that we are moving from the closed, unitary system of government of the Westminster model to a more open, decentralised system of governance. Our conceptions of citizenship have accordingly shifted, from one based on representation to one based on active participation, particularly within local communities. Governance is an issue which concerns all levels of government and citizen participation, from international-level World Bank concerns about commitment to efficiency and accountable government, to highly devolved localised urban regeneration partnerships.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×