Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Governance and Governmentality in Community Participation: The Shifting Sands of Power, Responsibility and Risk

  • Steve Rolfe (a1)

Abstract

Community participation has become an essential element of government policy around the globe in recent decades. This move towards ‘government through community’ has been presented as an opportunity for citizens to gain power and as a necessary part of the shift from government to governance, enabling states and communities to tackle complex problems in tandem. However, it has also been critiqued as an attempt to shift responsibility from the state onto communities. Using evidence from detailed case studies, this article examines the implementation of Localism in England and Community Empowerment in Scotland. The findings suggest a need for a more nuanced analysis of community participation policy, incorporating risk alongside responsibility and power, as well as considering the agency of communities and the local state. Furthermore, understanding the constraints on community participation is key, particularly in terms of the enveloping impacts of austerity and state retrenchment.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Adam, B., Beck, U. and Van Loon, J. (eds.) (2000) Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programmes, London: Sage.
Alexander, V., Thomas, H., Cronin, A., Fielding, J. and Moran-Ellis, J. (2008) ‘Mixed methods’, in Gilbert, N. (ed.), Researching Social Life, 3rd edn, London: Sage, 125–44.
Arnstein, S. (1969) ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 4, 216–24.
Barnes, M., Bauld, L., Benzeval, M., Judge, K., Lawson, L., Mackenzie, M., Mackinnon, J., Matka, E., Meth, F., Sullivan, H. and Truman, J. (2003) National Evaluation of Health Action Zones: Final Report, London: Department of Health.
Batley, R. and Edwards, J. (1974) ‘The Urban Programme. A report on some programme funded projects’, British Journal of Social Work, 4, 3, 305–31.
Batty, E., Beatty, C., Foden, M., Lawless, P., Pearson, S. and Wilson, I. (2010) The New Deal for Communities Experience: A Final Assessment, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.
Beetham, D., Blick, A. and Margetts, H. (2008) Power and Participation in Modern Britain, London: Democratic Audit.
Bulley, D. and Sokhi-Bulley, B. (2014) ‘Big Society as big government: Cameron's governmentality agenda’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16, 3, 452470.
Party, Conservative (2009) Control Shift - Returning Power to Local Communities - Policy Green Paper, London: Conservative Party.
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.) (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny?, London: Zed books.
Daly, M. (2003) ‘Governance and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 32, 1, 113–28.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2010) Decentralisation and the Localism Bill - An Essential Guide, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2011) A Plain English Guide to the Localism Act, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2013) You've got the Power: A Quick and Simple Guide to Community Rights, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2017) Landmark 6,000 of Community Rights reached this Communities Week, London: Department for Communities and Local Government, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/landmark-6000-of-community-rights-reached-this-communities-week [accessed 18.08.2017].
de Graaf, L., van Hulst, M. and Michels, A. (2014) ‘Enhancing participation in disadvantaged urban neighbourhoods’, Local Government Studies, 41, 1, 4462.
Dillon, D. and Fanning, B. (2011) Lessons for the Big Society: Planning, Regeneration and the Politics of Community Participation, Farnham: Ashgate.
Flint, J. (2004) ‘Reconfiguring agency and responsibility in the governance of social housing in Scotland’, Urban Studies, 41, 1, 151–72.
Foucault, M. (1991) ‘Governmentality’, in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 87104.
Gilbert, N. and Gilbert, B. (1989) The Enabling State: Modern Welfare Capitalism in America, New York: Oxford University Press.
Gilchrist, A. and Taylor, M. (2011) The Short Guide to Community Development, Bristol: Policy Press.
Gordon, C. (1991) ‘Governmental rationality: an introduction’, in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 152.
Green, J. and Chapman, A. (1992) ‘The British Community Development Project: lessons for today’, Community Development Journal, 27, 3, 242–58.
Hastings, A., Bailey, N., Bramley, G., Gannon, M. and Watkins, D. (2015a) The Cost of the Cuts: The Impact on Local Government and Poorer Communities, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Hastings, A., Bailey, N., Gannon, M., Besemer, K. and Bramley, G. (2015b) ‘Coping with the cuts? The management of the worst financial settlement in living memory’, Local Government Studies, 41, 4, 601–21.
Hastings, A. and Matthews, P. (2014) ‘Bourdieu and the Big Society: empowering the powerful in public service provision?’, Policy and Politics, 43, 4, 545–60.
Huxley, K., Andrews, R., Downe, J. and Guarneros-Meza, V. (2016) ‘Administrative traditions and citizen participation in public policy: a comparative study of France, Germany, the UK and Norway’, Policy and Politics, 44, 3, 383402.
Imrie, R. and Raco, M. (2003) ‘Community and the changing nature of urban policy’, in Imrie, R. and Raco, M. (eds.), Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy, Bristol: Policy Press, 336.
Keating, M. (2005) ‘Policy convergence and divergence in Scotland under devolution’, Regional Studies, 39, 4, 453–63.
Kennett, P., Jones, G., Meegan, R. and Croft, J. (2015) ‘Recession, austerity and the ‘great risk shift’: local government and household impacts and responses in Bristol and Liverpool’, Local Government Studies, 41, 4, 622–44.
Kooiman, J. (1999) ‘Social-political governance’, Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 1, 1, 6792.
Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing as Governance, London: Sage
Lowndes, V. and Pratchett, L. (2012) ‘Local governance under the Coalition government: austerity, localism and the ‘Big Society’’, Local Government Studies, 38, 1, 2140.
Maloney, W., Smith, G. and Stoker, G. (2000) ‘Social capital and urban governance: adding a more contextualised ‘top-down perspective’’, Political Studies, 48, 4, 823–41.
McCulloch, A., Mohan, J. and Smith, P. (2013) Patterns of Social Capital, Voluntary Activity and Area Deprivation in England, Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.
McKee, K. (2011) ‘Sceptical, disorderly and paradoxical subjects: problematising the ‘will to empower’ in social housing governance’, Housing, Theory and Society, 28, 1, 118.
McKee, K. and Cooper, V. (2008) ‘The paradox of tenant empowerment: regulatory and liberatory possibilities’, Housing, Theory and Society, 25, 2, 132–46.
Moore, T. and McKee, K. (2014) ‘The ownership of assets by place-based community organisations: political rationales, geographies of social impact and future research agenda’, Social Policy and Society, 13, 4, 521–33.
Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H. and Knops, A. (2004) ‘Public participation and collaborative governance’, Journal of Social Policy, 33, 2, 203–23.
Osborne, S. P. (2010) ‘Delivering public services: time for a new theory?’, Public Management Review, 12, 1, 110.
Peeters, R. (2013) ‘Responsibilisation on government's terms: new welfare and the governance of responsibility and solidarity’, Social Policy and Society, 12, 4, 583–95.
Pollitt, C. and Hupe, P. (2011) ‘Talking about government’, Public Management Review, 13, 5, 641– 58.
Public Services Commission (2011) Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services Report (The Christie Commission Report), Edinburgh: Public Services Commission.
Raco, M. and Imrie, R. (2000) ‘Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy’, Environment and Planning A, 32, 12, 2187–204.
Rhodes, R., (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Rivas, M. G. (2014) ‘Decentralization, community participation, and improvement of water access in Mexico’, Community Development, 45, 216.
Rolfe, S. (2016) ‘Divergence in community participation policy: analysing localism and community empowerment using a theory of change approach’, Local Government Studies, 42, 1, 97118.
Rose, N. (1996) ‘The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government’, Economy and Society, 25, 3, 327–56.
Rose, N. (1999) The Powers of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. and Miller, P. (2010) ‘Political power beyond the State: problematics of government’, British Journal of Sociology, 61, 271303.
Scottish Government (2011) Renewing Scotland's Public Services: Priorities for Reform in Response to the Christie Commission, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Scottish Government (2014) Community Empowerment (Scotland) Bill: Policy Memorandum, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Scottish Government and COSLA (2009) Scottish Community Empowerment Action Plan - Celebrating Success: Inspiring Change, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Stewart, J. and Lithgow, S. (2015) ‘Problems and prospects in community engagement in urban planning and decision-making: three case studies from the Australian Capital Territory’, Policy Studies, 36, 1, 1834.
Stoker, G. (1998) ‘Governance as theory: five propositions’, International Social Science Journal, 50, 1728.
Tarrow, S. (1994) Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Mass Politics in the Modern State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, M. (2007) ‘Community participation in the real world: opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces’, Urban Studies, 44, 2, 297317.
Tulloch, J. and Lupton, D. (2003) Risk and Everyday Life, London: Sage.
United Nations (2016) Sustainable Development Goals, Geneva: United Nations, http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/# [accessed 10.07.2017].
Xiaojun, Y. and Ge, X. (2016) ‘Participatory policy making under authoritarianism: the pathways of local budgetary reform in the People's Republic of China’, Policy and Politics, 44, 2, 215–34.

Keywords

Governance and Governmentality in Community Participation: The Shifting Sands of Power, Responsibility and Risk

  • Steve Rolfe (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed