Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Marginalised or Enabled Voices? ‘User Participation’ in Policy and Practice

  • Catherine Bochel (a1), Hugh Bochel (a1), Peter Somerville (a1) and Claire Worley (a2)
Abstract

The idea of participation has been central to many policy developments in recent years. Both Conservative and Labour governments have used notions of participation and involvement in attempts to justify and implement their social policies. Yet, despite a plethora of initiatives and guidance around ‘participation’ emerging from all levels of government, and a substantial academic literature, there remains a major, and potentially damaging, lack of clarity over many aspects of participation, while the secret of achieving ‘real’ participation appears to continue to remain elusive.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arksey H. and Glendinning C. (2007), ‘Choice in the context of informal care-giving’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 15, 2, 165175.
Bang H. (2005), ‘Among everyday makers and expert citizens’, in Newman J. (ed.), Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 159178.
Barnes M., Davis A. and Rogers H. (2006), ‘Women's voices, women's choices: experiences and creativity in consulting women users of mental health services’, Journal of Mental Health, 15, 3, 329341.
Barnes M., Knops A., Newman J. and Sullivan H. (2004), ‘Recent research: the micro-politics of deliberation: case studies in public participation’, Contemporary Politics, 10, 2, 93110.
Barnes M., Newman J. and Sullivan H. (2007), Power, Participation and Political Renewal: Case Studies in Public Participation, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Beresford P. and Hoban M. (2005), Participation in Anti-Poverty and Regeneration Work and Research: Overcoming Barriers and Creating Opportunities, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Birchall J. and Simmons R. (2004), User Power: The Participation of Users in Public Services, National Consumer Council.
Bochel C. (2006), ‘New Labour: participation and the policy process’, Public Policy and Administration, 21, 4, 1022.
Bochel C. and Evans A. (2007), ‘Inclusive policy making’, in Bochel H. and Duncan S. (eds), Making Policy in Theory and Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Bochel C. and Bochel H. (2004), The UK Social Policy Process, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bochel H. and Duncan S. (eds) (2007), Making Policy in Theory and Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Cabinet Office (2002), Viewfinder: A Policy Maker's Guide to Public Involvement, London: Cabinet Office.
Carr S. (2007), ‘Participation, power, conflict and change: theorizing dynamics of service user participation in the social care system of England and Wales’, Critical Social Policy, 27, 2, 266276.
Fung A. and Wright E. O. (2003), Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations In Empowered Participatory Governance, London: Verso.
Gaventa J. (2004), Representation, Community Leadership and Participation: Citizen Involvement in Neighbourhood Renewal and Local Governance, Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, ODPM.
Geddes M. (2006), ‘Partnership and the limits to local governance in England: institutionalist analysis and neoliberalism’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, 1, 7697.
Gustafsson U. and Driver S. (2005), ‘Parents, power and public participation: sure start, an experiment in New Labour governance’, Social Policy and Administration, 39, 5, 528543.
Hague G. (2005), ‘Domestic violence survivors' forums in the UK: experiments in involving abused women in domestic violence services and policy-making’, Journal of Gender Studies, 14, 3, 191203.
Halpern D. (2005), Social Capital, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Harbers I. (2007), ‘Democratic deepening in Third Wave democracies: experiments with participation in Mexico City’, Political Studies, 55, 1, 3858.
Hiebert W. and Swan D. (1999), ‘Positively fit: a case study in community development and the role of participatory action research’, Community Development Journal, 34, 4, 356364.
Hilditch M. (2007) ‘Providers begin to veer off choice-based lettings road’, Inside Housing, 27 July: 13.
Howard J. and Sweeting D. (2007) ‘Neighbourhoods, democracy and citizenship’, in Smith I., Lepine E. and Taylor M. (eds), Disadvantaged By Where You Live? Neighbourhood Governance and Urban Policy, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 105124.
Kooiman J. (2005), Governing as Governance, London: Sage.
Layard R. (2005), Happiness: Lessons from a New Science, London: Allen Lane.
Massey A. and Pyper R. (2005), Public Management and Modernisation in Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morris J. (2006), Removing the Barriers to Community Participation, London: National Community Forum/Neighbourhood Renewal Unit/IPPR.
Newman J., Barnes M., Sullivan H. and Knops A. (2004), ‘Public participation and collaborative governance’, Journal of Social Policy, 33, 2, 203223.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2002), ‘Tenants managing: an evaluation of tenant management organisations in England’, Housing Research Summary 174, ODPM, London.
Perrons D. and Skyers S. (2004), ‘Challenging injustices through status recognition: conceptual explorations and a case study of the Shoreditch New Deal Partnership’, at: www.lse.ac.uk/collections/geographyAndEnvironment/research/Researchpapers/rp66.pdf.
Platt S. and Cooper I. (2006), ‘Democracy and development’, in Malpass P. and Cairncross L.. (eds), Building on the Past: Visions of Housing Futures, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Saward M. (2005), ‘Governance and the transformation of political representation’, in Newman J. (ed.), Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 179196.
Skidmore P., Bound K. and Lownsbrough H. (2006), Community Participation: Who Benefits?, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, at: www.jrf.org.uk.
Somerville P. and Haines N. (2007), forthcoming, ‘Prospects for local co-governance’, Local Government Studies.
Stoker G. (2007) Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wright J., Parry J., Mathers J., Jones S. and Orford J. (2007), ‘Assessing the participatory potential of Britain's New Deal for Communities’, Policy Studies, 27, 4, 347361.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 107 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 337 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.