Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 47
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Alcock, Pete 2016. From Partnership to the Big Society: The Third Sector Policy Regime in the UK. Nonprofit Policy Forum, Vol. 7, Issue. 2,

    Dacombe, Rod and Morrow, Elizabeth 2016. The Voluntary Sector and Criminal Justice.

    Hogg, Eddy Kendall, Jeremy and Breeze, Beth 2016. Knitting together? the third sector and the state in England. SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI, Issue. 3, p. 27.

    Maher, Chi 2016. Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurial Success and its Impact on Regional Development.

    Sancino, Alessandro and Jacklin-Jarvis, Carol 2016. Co-production in the Public Sector.

    Tacon, Richard and Walters, Geoff 2016. Modernisation and governance in UK national governing bodies of sport: how modernisation influences the way board members perceive and enact their roles. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, p. 1.

    Glasius, Marlies and Ishkanian, Armine 2015. Surreptitious Symbiosis: Engagement Between Activists and NGOs. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 26, Issue. 6, p. 2620.

    Johansson, Håkan Arvidson, Malin and Johansson, Staffan 2015. Welfare Mix as a Contested Terrain: Political Positions on Government–Non-profit Relations at National and Local Levels in a Social Democratic Welfare State. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 26, Issue. 5, p. 1601.

    MILBOURNE, LINDA and CUSHMAN, MIKE 2015. Complying, Transforming or Resisting in the New Austerity? Realigning Social Welfare and Independent Action among English Voluntary Organisations. Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 44, Issue. 03, p. 463.

    Baggott, Rob and Jones, Kathryn 2014. The voluntary sector and health policy: The role of national level health consumer and patients' organisations in the UK. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 123, p. 202.

    Chaney, Paul 2014. Multi-level Systems and the Electoral Politics of Welfare Pluralism: Exploring Third-Sector Policy in UK Westminster and Regional Elections 1945–2011. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 585.

    Hardwick, L. 2014. Advocacy versus Social Work: What the Setting-Up of an Advocacy Rights Hub Reveals about Social Work's Ability to Promote Social Inclusion. British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 44, Issue. 7, p. 1700.

    Moreira, Tiago O'Donovan, Orla and Howlett, Etaoine 2014. Assembling dementia care: Patient organisations and social research. BioSocieties, Vol. 9, Issue. 2, p. 173.

    Bingham, Timothy and Walters, Geoff 2013. Financial Sustainability Within UK Charities: Community Sport Trusts and Corporate Social Responsibility Partnerships. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 606.

    Dacombe, Rod 2013. Sports clubs and civic inclusion: rethinking the poverty of association. Sport in Society, Vol. 16, Issue. 10, p. 1263.


    Kim, Suyoung 2013. Voluntary Organizations as New Street-level Bureaucrats: Frontline Struggles of Community Organizations against Bureaucratization in a South Korean Welfare-to-Work Partnership. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 47, Issue. 5, p. 565.

    May, Thomas Harris, Spencer and Collins, Mike 2013. Implementing community sport policy: understanding the variety of voluntary club types and their attitudes to policy. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, Vol. 5, Issue. 3, p. 397.

    Heley, Jesse and Moles, Kate 2012. Partnership working in regions: Reflections on local government collaboration in Wales*. Regional Science Policy & Practice, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 139.

    Lewis, David 2012. Across the little divide? Life histories of public and third sector “boundary crossers”. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 158.


New Labour's Approach to the Voluntary Sector: Independence and the Meaning of Partnership

  • Jane Lewis (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2005

A major problem for voluntary organisations service providers under contract has been their independence in regard to both the relatively narrow issue of the terms and conditions of service provision, and the broader issue about the part voluntary organisations might play in policy shaping and democratic renewal. I examine the way in which New Labour has developed its ‘partnership’ approach to the voluntary sector since 1998. I argue that better terms and conditions have been secured for voluntary organisations providing services, and that large and umbrella organisations now have more impact on the implementation of central government policy. However, the more equal partnership required for a policy-shaping role in the sense of agenda-setting is likely to remain elusive, while at the local level there are tensions between the idea of voluntary organisations as agents of ‘civil renewal’ and as service providers.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *