Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Place of Social Citizenship and Property Rights in Brazil’s ‘Right to the City’ Debate

  • Abigail Friendly (a1)

Abstract

There has been considerable attention on Brazil’s experience in applying the right to the city, influencing the urban reform movement and subsequent legislation including the 1988 Constitution and the 2001 Statute of the City. While much is known about Brazil’s urban transformations, this article views this trajectory within debates on social citizenship, expanding the focus to show that property is integral to this debate. Through the lens of social citizenship, property rights and insurgency, this article traces Brazil’s right to the city debate through a focus on three issues: (1) the rights dimension of such debates; (2) the role of the social function of property in urban legislation; and (3) the role of insurgent planning evident in urban social movements. While property rights and land rights are often distanced from debates on social citizenship, the Brazil case provides evidence in which the two are clearly intertwined.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Place of Social Citizenship and Property Rights in Brazil’s ‘Right to the City’ Debate
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Place of Social Citizenship and Property Rights in Brazil’s ‘Right to the City’ Debate
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Place of Social Citizenship and Property Rights in Brazil’s ‘Right to the City’ Debate
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

Hide All
Bassul, R. (2005) Estatuto da Cidade: Quem Ganhou? Quem Perdeu?, Brasília: Sentado Federal.
Braathen, E., Mascarenhas, G. and Sørbøe, C. M. (2016) ‘A ‘City of Exception’? Rio de Janeiro and the disputed social legacy of the 2014 and 2016 sports mega-events’, in Viehoff, V. and Poynter, G. (eds.), Mega-Event Cities: Urban Legacies of Global Sports Events, New York: Routledge, 261–70.
Brøgger, D. (2019) ‘Unequal urban rights: critical reflections on property and urban citizenship’, Urban Studies, 56, 14, 2977–92.
Caldeira, T. (2017) ‘Peripheral urbanization: autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35, 1, 320.
Caldeira, T. and Holston, J. (2005) ‘State and urban space in Brazil: from modernist planning to democratic interventions’, in Ong, A. and Collier, S. J. (eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, London: Blackwell, 393416.
Caldeira, T. and Holston, J. (2015) ‘Participatory urban planning in Brazil’, Urban Studies, 52, 11, 2001–17.
Castells, M. (1977) The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cunha, A. dos S. (2011) ‘The social function of property in Brazilian law’, Fordham Law Review, 80, 3, 1171–81.
Dagnino, E. (2005) ‘‘We all have rights, but …’ Contesting concepts of citizenship in Brazil’, in Kabeer, N. (ed.), Inclusive Citizenship: Meanings and Expressions, London: Zed Books, 149–63.
Davy, B. (2009) ‘The poor and the land: poverty, property, planning’, Town Planning Review, 80, 3, 227–65.
Davy, B. (2012) Land Policy: Planning and the Spatial Consequences of Property, Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Earle, L. (2017) Transgressive Citizenship and the Struggle for Social Justice: The Right to the City in São Paulo, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fernandes, E. (2007a) ‘Constructing the “Right to the City” in Brazil’, Social and Legal Studies, 16, 2, 201–19.
Fernandes, E. (2007b) ‘Implementing the urban reform agenda in Brazil’, Environment and Urbanization, 19, 1, 177–89.
Fernandes, E. (2011) ‘Implementing the urban reform agenda in Brazil: possibilities, challenges, and lessons’, Urban Forum, 22, 3, 229314.
Fernandes, E. (2014) ‘Brazil’s ‘Winter of Discontent’: what it says about urban planning and urban law’, https://booksandideas.net/Brazil-s-Winter-of-Discontent.html [accessed 29.01.19].
Fischer, B. (2008) A Poverty of Rights: Citizenship and Inequality in Twentieth-Century Rio de Janeiro, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Friedmann, J. (2002) The Prospect of Cities, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Friendly, A. (2013) ‘The right to the city: theory and practice in Brazil’, Planning Theory and Practice, 14, 2, 158–79.
Friendly, A. (2016) ‘The changing landscape of civil society in Niterói, Brazil’, Latin American Research Review, 51, 1, 218–41.
Friendly, A. (2017) ‘Urban policy, social movements and the right to the city in Brazil’, Latin American Perspectives, 44, 2, 132–48.
Friendly, A. (2019) ‘The contradictions of participatory planning: reflections on the role of politics in urban development in Niterói, Brazil’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 41, 7, 910–29.
Friendly, A. and Stiphany, K. (2019) ‘Paradigm or paradox? The ‘cumbersome impasse’ of the participatory turn in Brazilian urban planning’, Urban Studies, 56, 2, 271–87.
Foster, S. R. and Bonilla, D. (2011) ‘The social function of property: a comparative law perspective’, Fordham Law Review, 80, 3, 101–13.
Hagopian, F. (2011) ‘Paradoxes of democracy and citizenship in Brazil’, Latin American Research Review, 46, 3, 216–27.
Harvey, D. (2009) Social Justice and the City, Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Holston, J. (1998) ‘Spaces of insurgent citizenship’, in Sandercock, L. (ed.), Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History, Berkeley: University of California Press, 3777.
Holston, J. (2008) Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Huchzermeyer, M. (2015) ‘Reading Henri Lefebvre from the global south: the legal dimension of his right to the city’, UHURU Seminar Series, Rhodes University, https://www.ru.ac.za/media/rhodesuniversity/content/uhuru/documents/Marie_Huchzermeyer_Reading_Henri_Lefebvre_from_the_global_south-UHURU_Seminars_20_May_2015.pdf [accessed 24.09.2019].
Huchzermeyer, M. (2018) ‘The legal meaning of Lefebvre’s the right to the city: addressing the gap between global campaign and scholarly debate’, GeoJournal, 83, 3, 631–44.
Irazábal, C. (2008) Ordinary Places, Extraordinary Places: Citizenship, Democracy, and Public Space in Latin America, London: Routledge.
Jacobi, P. (1982) ‘Movimentos Populares Urbanos e Resposta do Estado: Autonomia e Controle vs. Cooptação e Clientelismo’, in Boschi, R. R. (ed.), Movimentos Coletivos no Brasil Urbano, Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 145–79.
Klink, J. and Denaldi, R. (2016) ‘On urban reform, rights and planning challenges in the Brazilian metropolis’, Planning Theory, 15, 4, 402–17.
Kofman, E. and Lebas, E. (1996) ‘Lost in transposition – time, space and the city’, in Kofman, E. and Lebas, E. (eds.), Writings on Cities, Oxford: Blackwell, 364.
Lefebvre, H. (1968) Le Droit à la Ville, Paris: Anthopos.
Lund, C. (2011) Land Rights and Citizenship in Africa, Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikinstitutet.
Lund, C. (2016) ‘Rule and rupture: state formation through the production of property and citizenship’, Development and Change, 47, 6, 1199–228.
Machado, C. R. S. (2008) ‘Momentos da Obra de Henri Lefebvre: Uma Apresentação’, Ambiente e Educação, 13, 8395.
Mainwaring, S. (1986) ‘The transition to democracy in Brazil’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 28, 1, 149–79.
Maricato, E. (2017) ‘The future of global peripheral cities’, Latin American Perspectives, 44, 2, 1837.
Marshall, T. H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, M. (2012) ‘The “Right to the City” in urban social movements’, in Brenner, N., Marcuse, P. and Mayer, M. (eds.), Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, New York: Routledge, 6385.
Meth, P. (2010) ‘Unsettling insurgency: reflections on women’s insurgent practices in South Africa’, Planning Theory and Practice, 11, 2, 241–63.
Miraftab, F. (2009) ‘Insurgent planning: situating radical planning in the global south’, Planning Theory, 8, 1, 3251.
Miraftab, F. (2018) ‘Insurgent practices and de-colonization of future(s)’, in Gunder, M., Madanipour, A. and Watson, V. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, New York: Routledge, 276–88.
Miraftab, F. and Wills, S. (2005) ‘Insurgency and spaces of active citizenship the story of Western Cape anti-eviction campaign in South Africa’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25, 2, 200–17.
Mitchell, D. (2003) The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space, New York: The Guilford Press.
Mirow, M. C. (2010) ‘The social-obligation norm of property: Duguit, Hayes, and others’, Florida Journal of International Law, 22, 191226.
Omena de Melo, E. (2017) ‘Lefebvre and the periphery: an interview with Professor Marie Huchzermeyer’, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 9, 3, 365–70.
Ondetti, G. (2016) ‘The social function of property, land rights and social welfare in Brazil’, Land Use Policy, 50, 2937.
Paoli, M. and Telles, V. (1998) ‘Social rights: conflicts and negotiations in contemporary Brazil’, in Alvarez, S., Dagnino, E. and Escobar, A. (eds.), Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultures: Revisioning Latin American Social Movements, Boulder: Westview, 6492.
Pimentel Walker, A. P. and Arquero de Alarcón, M. (2018) ‘The competing social and environmental functions of private urban land: the case of an informal land occupation in São Paulo’s south periphery’, Sustainability, 10, 11, 4160–83.
Purcell, M. (2002) ‘Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant’, GeoJournal, 58, 99108.
Roche, M. (1987) ‘Citizenship, social theory and social change’, Theory and Society, 16, 363–99.
Sandercock, L. (1999) ‘Translations: from insurgent planning practices to radical planning discourses’, Plurimondi, 1/2, 3746.
Santos, W. G. dos (1979) Cidadania e Justiça, Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
Schaap, A. (2011) ‘Enacting the right to have rights: Jacques Rancière’s Critique of Hannah Arendt’, European Journal of Political Theory, 10, 1, 2245.
Souza, M. L. d. (2006) ‘Together with the state, despite the state, against the state: social movements as ‘critical urban planning’ agents’, City, 10, 3, 327–42.
Swyngedouw, E. (2018) Promises of the Political: Insurgent Cities in a Post-Political Environment, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Vicino, T. J. and Fahlberg, A. (2017) ‘The politics of contested urban space: the 2013 protest movement in Brazil’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 39, 7, 1001–16.
Watson, V. (2012) ‘Planning and the ‘stubborn realities’ of global south-east cities: some emerging ideas’, Planning Theory, 12, 1, 81100.
Wolfe, J. (1994) ‘“Father of the Poor” or “Mother of the Rich”?: Getúilio Vargas, industrial workers, and constructions of class, gender, and populism in São Paulo, 1930-1954’, Radical History Review, 58, 80111.

Keywords

The Place of Social Citizenship and Property Rights in Brazil’s ‘Right to the City’ Debate

  • Abigail Friendly (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed