Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Politics of MPF Reform: Lessons from Public Attitudes in Hong Kong

  • Stefan Kühner (a1) and Kee-Lee Chou (a2)


This article examines public attitudes towards two reform options for the defined-contribution (DC) Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) scheme in Hong Kong: (i) increasing MPF contributions; or (ii) introducing a universal pension partly funded by switching MPF contributions to the universal pension. Drawing on a phone survey conducted with 975 active contributors to the MPF, we examine whether agreement with these MPF reform options can be explained by respondents’ self-interest, attachment to different welfare ideologies, their level of confusion with the MPF, uncertainty about future MPF income, and trust in the Hong Kong government to deal with MPF issues. This research identifies that it is uncertainty with future MPF income and low trust in the Hong Kong government to deal with MPF issues that have the most significant effect on respondents’ MPF reform preferences. Mainstream accounts of the effect of liberalist, universalist, conservative, and familistic welfare ideologies are only partially confirmed.



Hide All
Abid, Y. and O’Donoghue, C. (2014) ‘Irish citizens’ attitudes to pension reform and redistribution’, Social Policy and Society, 13, 2, 203220.
Abid, Y., Doherty, E., Flannery, D. and O’Donoghue, C. (2013) Eliciting Individual Preferences for Pension Reform, [accessed 25.08.2018].
Ashcroft, J. (2009) Defined-Contribution (DC) Arrangements in Anglo-Saxon Countries, [accessed 10.08.2018].
Berens, S. and Gelepithis, M. (2019) ‘Welfare state structure, inequality, and public attitudes towards progressive taxation’, Socio-Economic Review, 17, 4, 823–50.
Boeri, T. and Tabellini, G. (2012) ‘Does information increase political support for pension reform?’, Public Choice, 150, 1/2, 327–62.
Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A. and Tabellini, G. (2002) ‘Pension reforms and the opinions of European citizens’, The American Economic Review, 92, 2, 396401.
Busemeyer, M. R., Lergetporer, P. and Woessmann, L. (2018) ‘Public opinion and the political economy of educational reforms: a survey’, European Journal of Political Economy, 53, 1, 161–85.
Buss, C. (2019) ‘Public opinion towards targeted labour market policies: a vignette study on the perceived deservingness of the unemployed’, Journal of European Social Policy, 29, 2, 228–40.
Census and Statistics Department (2015) Hong Kong Population Projections 2015-2064, [accessed 10.08.2018].
Chan, C. K. (2003) ‘Protecting the ageing poor or strengthening the market economy: the case of the Hong Kong mandatory provident fund’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 12, 2, 123–31.
Chan, C. K. (2011) Social Security Policy in Hong Kong: From British Colony to China’s Special Administrative Region, Plymouth: Lexington Books.
Chou, K. L. (2010) ‘Number of children and upstream intergenerational financial transfers: evidence from Hong Kong’, The Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 65(B), 2, 227–35.
Chou, K. L., Yu, K. M., Chan, W. S., Chan, A. C. M., Lum, T. Y. S. and Zhu, A. Y. F. (2014) ‘Social and psychological barriers to private retirement savings in Hong Kong’, Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 26, 4, 308–23.
Chou, K. L., Yu, K. M., Chan, W. S., Wu, A. M., Zhu, A. Y. F. and Lou, V. W. Q. (2015) ‘Perceived retirement savings adequacy in Hong Kong: an interdisciplinary financial planning model’, Ageing and Society, 35, 8, 1565–86.
Chung, T. Y. and Pang, K. L. (2016) Survey on Retirement Protection, [accessed 25.08.2018].
Chung, H., Taylor-Gooby, P. and Leruth, B. (2018) ‘Political legitimacy and welfare state futures’, Social Policy and Administration, 52, 4, 835–46.
Clark, G., Strauss, K. and Knox-Hayes, J. (2012) Saving for Retirement: Intention, Context, and Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Commission on Poverty (2015) Retirement Protection Forging Ahead - Consultation Document, [accessed 10.09.2019].
Duflo, E. (2000) ‘Child health and household resources in South Africa: evidence from the old age pension program’, American Economic Review, 90, 2, 393–8.
Ebbinghaus, B. (2015) ‘The privatization and marketization of pensions in Europe: a double transformation facing the crisis’, European Policy Analysis, 1, 1, 5673.
Ebbinghaus, B. and Whiteside, N. (2012) ‘Shifting responsibilities in Western European pension systems: what future for social models?’, Global Social Policy, 12, 3, 266–82.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Oxford: Polity Press.
Fernández, J. J. and Jaime-Castillo, A. M. (2013) ‘Positive or negative policy feedbacks? Explaining popular attitudes towards pragmatic pension policy reforms’, European Sociological Review, 29, 4, 803–15.
Galasso, V. and Profeta, P. (2002) ‘The political economy of social security: a survey’, European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 1, 926.
Gelissen, J. (2001) ‘Old-age pensions: individual or collective responsibility? An investigation of public opinion across European welfare states’, European Societies, 3, 4, 495523.
Groezen, B. V., Kiiver, H. and Unger, B. (2009) ‘Explaining Europeans’ preferences for pension provision’, European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 2, 237–46.
Immergut, E. M., Anderson, K. M. and Schulze, I. (eds.) (2007) The Handbook of West European Pension Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jaime-Castillo, A. M. (2013) ‘Public opinion and the reform of the pension systems in Europe: the influence of solidarity principles’, Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 4, 390405.
Janky, B. and Gál, R. I. (2007) ‘Public opinion on pension systems in Europe’, European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes Research Report No. 36, [accessed 15.09.2018].
Kühner, S. and Chou, K. L. (2019) ‘Poverty alleviation, coverage and fiscal sustainability: investigating the effect of a new social pension in Hong Kong’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 28, 1, 8999.
Larsen, C. A. (2008) ‘The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: how welfare regimes influence public support’, Comparative Political Studies, 41, 2, 145–68.
Lynch, J. and Myrskylä, M. (2009) ‘Always the third rail? Pension income and policy preferences in European democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 42, 8, 1068–97.
MacLeod, P., Fitzpatrick, A., Hamlyn, B., Jones, A., Kinver, A. and Page, L. (2012) Attitudes to Pensions: The 2012 Survey, [accessed 25.08.2018].
Mau, S. (2004) ‘Welfare regimes and the norms of social exchange’, Current Sociology, 52, 1, 5374.
Mok, K. H. and Jiang, J. (2018) ‘Massification of higher education and challenges for graduate employment and social mobility: East Asian experiences and sociological reflections’, International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 1, 4451.
MPFA (2016) Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Statistics Digest, March 2016, [accessed 15.09.2018].
Naumann, E. (2017) ‘Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge and ideology’, Ageing and Society, 37, 2, 266–94.
Ring, P. J. (2010) ‘Governance and governmentality: a discussion in the context of UK private pension provision’, Economy and Society, 39, 4, 534–50.
Ring, P. J. (2012) ‘Trust: a challenge for private pension policy’, Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 28, 2, 119–28.
Svallfors, S. (ed.) (2012) Contested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2011) Reframing Social Citizenship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tepe, M. (2006) Individual Preferences for Old Age Pension. Evidence from the International Social Survey Program, [accessed 15.09.2018].
Weaver, R. K. (2003) The Politics of Public Pension Reform, [accessed 15.09.2018].
Webb, R., Watson, D., Ring, P. and Bryce, C. (2014) ‘Pension confusion, uncertainty and trust in Scotland: an empirical analysis’, Journal of Social Policy, 43, 3, 595613.
Zinn, J. O. (2008) ‘Heading into the unknown: everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty’, Health, Risk and Society, 10, 5, 439–50.


The Politics of MPF Reform: Lessons from Public Attitudes in Hong Kong

  • Stefan Kühner (a1) and Kee-Lee Chou (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed