Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Understanding the exercise of agency within structural inequality: the case of personal debt

  • Michael Orton (a1)
Abstract

This article contributes to debates about agency (meaning the behaviour of individuals) and structure, by drawing on empirical research into personal debt. Consideration of debt allows for debate about agency and structure beyond the narrow confines of welfare, and for the examination of agency in relation to citizens at different points in the broader socio-economic structure, not solely poor people. Based on the research findings, themselves grounded in interviewees' experience, the question of why two people in the same material circumstances will have different experiences becomes reframed as why two people whose exercise of agency is the same, face very different outcomes? It is argued that while the research supports a ‘both-and’ rather than ‘either-or’ approach to understanding agency and structure, a ‘both-and’ approach still does not fully capture the experience of interviewees. The key point is that the exercise of agency is overlaid onto structural inequality, and it is understanding the exercise of ‘agency within structure’ that is critical.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Balmer N., Pleasence P., Buck A. and Walker H. C. (2005), ‘Worried sick: the experience of debt problems and their relationship with health, illness and disability’, Social Policy and Society, 5, 1, 3951.
Bauman Z. (1997), Postmodernity and Its Discontents, New York: New York University Press.
Beck U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.
BERR (2007), Tackling Over-Indebtedness: Annual Report 2007, London: BERR.
Berthoud R. and Kempson E. (1992), Credit and Debt: The PSI Report, London: Policy Studies Institute.
Brewer M., Goodman A., Muriel A. and Sibieta L. (2007), Poverty and Inequality in Britain: 2007, London: IFS.
Buck A., Pleasance P. and Balmer N. (2008), ‘Do citizens know how to deal with legal issues? Some empirical insights’, Journal of Social Policy, 37, 4, 661–81.
Burgess R. G. (1991), In the Field, London: Routledge.
Cook D. (1989), Rich Law, Poor Law: Different Responses to Tax and Supplementary Benefit Fraud, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Deacon A. (2002), ‘Echoes of Sir Keith? New Labour and the cycle of disadvantage’, Benefits, 10, 3, 179–84.
Deacon A. (2004), ‘Different interpretations of agency within welfare debates’, Social Policy and Society, 3, 4, 447–56.
Deacon A. (2005), ‘An ethic of mutual responsibility? Toward a fuller justification for conditionality in welfare’, in Mead L. and Beem C. (eds.), Welfare Reform and Political Theory, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Deacon A. and Mann K. (1999), ‘Agency, modernity and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 28, 3, 413–35.
Doble M. (2000), ‘A regulatory policy for self-disconnection: an examination of the reasons for and implications of pre-payment meter stoppages’, Policy Studies, 21, 3, 229–43.
Dominy N. and Kempson E. (2003), Can't Pay or Won't Pay, DCA Research Series 4/03, London: Lord Chancellor's Department.
Dwyer P. (2000), Welfare Rights and Responsibilities, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Edwards S. (2003), In Too Deep, London: Citizens Advice.
Etzioni A. (1997), The New Golden Rule, London: Profile Books.
Field F. (1995), Making Welfare Work, London: Institute of Community Studies.
Giddens A. (1994), Beyond Left and Right, Cambridge: Polity.
Grover C. (2007), ‘The Freud Report on the future of welfare to work: some critical reflections’, Critical Social Policy, 27, 4, 534–45.
Herbert A. and Kempson E. (1995), Water Debt and Disconnection, London: Policy Studies Institute.
Hoggett P. (2001), ‘Agency, rationality and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 30, 1, 3756.
Jencks C. (1994), The Homeless, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kempson E., McKay S. and Willitts K. (2004), Characteristics of Families in Debt and the Nature of Indebtedness, London: DWP.
Le Grand J. (1997), ‘Knights, knaves or pawns? Human behaviour and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 26, 2, 149–69.
Le Grand J. (2003), Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lister R. (2004), Poverty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
McKay S. (2004), ‘Rising levels of household debt – how concerned should we be?’, Benefits, 12, 3, 199201.
Mead L. (1986), Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship, New York: The Free Press.
Mead L. (ed.) (1997), The New Paternalism, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Mead L. (2004), Government Matters: Welfare Reform in Wisconsin, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Murray C. (1984), Losing Ground, New York: Basic Books.
Murray C. (1990), The Emerging British Underclass, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Orton M. (2004), ‘Irresponsible citizens? New Labour, citizenship and the case of non-payment of local taxation’, Critical Social Policy, 24, 4, 504–25.
Orton M. (2006), Struggling to Pay Council Tax: A New Perspective on the Debate about Local Taxation, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Parker G. (1988), ‘Indebtedness’, in Walker R. and Parker G. (eds.), Money Matters, London: SAGE Publications.
Public Legal Education and Support Task Force (2007), Developing Capable Citizens: The Role of Public Legal Education, London: Public Legal Education Task Force.
Rock P. (1973), Making People Pay, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ritchie J., Spencer L. and O'Connor W. (2003), ‘Carrying out qualitative analysis’, in Ritchie J. and Lewis J. (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage.
Summers B., Read D. and Fylan F. (2005), Literature in the Areas of Behavioural Economics and Psychology Relevant to the Understanding of an Individual's Propensity to Engage with Their Creditors, London: Department for Constitutional Affairs.
Taylor Gooby P. (2008), ‘Assumptive worlds and images of agency: academic social policy in the twenty-first century?’, Social Policy and Society, 7, 3, 268–80.
Turley C. and White C. (2007), Assessing the Impact of Advice for People with Debt Problems: Final Report, London: Legal Services Research Centre.
Welshman J. (2004), ‘The unknown Titmuss’, Journal of Social Policy, 33, 2, 225–48.
Williams F. and Popay J. (1999), ‘Balancing polarities: developing a new framework for welfare research’, in Williams F., Popay J. and Oakely A. (eds.), Welfare Research: A Critical Review, London: UCL Press.
Williams F., Popay J. and Oakley A. (1999), ‘Changing paradigms of welfare’, in Williams F., Popay J. and Oakley A. (eds.), Welfare Research: A Critical Review, London: UCL Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 158 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.