Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-21T12:45:17.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AN APPROPRIATE METRIC FOR CUE WEIGHTING IN L2 SPEECH PERCEPTION: Response to Escudero and Boersma (2004)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2005

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
Affiliation:
University of Alberta

Abstract

Flege, Bohn, and Jang (1997) and Escudero and Boersma (2004) analyzed first language-Spanish second language-English listeners' perception of English /i/–/i/ continua that varied in spectral and duration properties. They compared individuals and groups on the basis of spectral reliance and duration reliance measures. These reliance measures indicate the change in identification rates from one extreme of the stimulus space to the other; they make use of only a portion of the data collected and suffer from a ceiling effect. The current paper presents a reanalysis of Escudero and Boersma's data using first-order logistic regression modeling. All of the available data contribute to the calculation of logistic regression coefficients, and they do not suffer from the same ceiling effect as the reliance measures. It is argued that—as a metric of cue weighting—logistic regression coefficients offer methodological and substantive advantages over the reliance measures.My thanks to Paola Escudero and Paul Boersma for making their data available, and thanks to Terrance M. Nearey for comments on an earlier draft of this paper (any defects are my own responsibility). This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Type
RESPONSES
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benkí, J. R. (2001). Place of articulation and first formant transition pattern both affect perception of voicing in English. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 122.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171204). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Bohn, O.-S. (1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn't tell it all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279304). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551585.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on nonnative speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437470.Google Scholar
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (3rd ed). New York: Wiley.
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression ( 2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nearey, T. M. (1990). The segment as a unit of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 347373.Google Scholar
Nearey, T. M. (1997). Speech perception as pattern recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 32413254.Google Scholar
Pampel, F. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.