Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T22:08:33.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BEYOND SEGMENTS

Prosody in SLA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

Ineke Mennen  and
Esther de Leeuw
Ineke Mennen*
Affiliation:
Bangor University
Esther de Leeuw
Affiliation:
Queen Mary, University of London
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ineke Mennen, Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Bangor University, 37-41 College Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2DG, United Kingdom. E-mail: i.mennen@bangor.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 36 , Issue 2: Beyond Segments: Prosody in SLA , June 2014 , pp. 183 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The idea of putting together this special issue originated during a workshop on L2 prosody at Bangor University organized by the first author. We would like to thank all participants of that workshop for the enthusiasm with which this idea was received. We wish to express our sincere thanks to all of the authors for their excellent contributions to this issue and to the SSLA editorial team for all their help in bringing this issue to completion. We extend a particular thank-you to the Arts and Humanities Research Council for providing the first author with the time to help shape this special issue through a fellowship (AH/J000302/1).

References

REFERENCES

Altmann, H. (2006). The perception and production of second language stress: A cross-linguistic experimental study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware, Newark.Google Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555.Google Scholar
Archibald, J. (1997). The acquisition of English stress by speakers of nonaccentual languages: Lexical storage versus computation of stress. Linguistics, 35, 167–181.Google Scholar
Atoye, R. O. (2005). Non-native perception and interpretation of English intonation. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 14, 26–42.Google Scholar
Banjo, A. (1979). Beyond intelligibility in Nigerian English. In Ubahakwe, E. (Ed.), Varieties and functions of English in Nigeria (pp. 7–13). Ibadan, Nigeria: African Universities Press.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boula de Mareüil, P., Marotta, G., & Adda-Decker, M. (2004). Contribution of prosody to the perception of Spanish/Italian accents. In Bel, B. & Marlien, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Speech Prosody, Nara, Japan (pp. 681–684). Aix-en-Provence, France: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Boula de Mareüil, P., & Vieru-Dimulescu, B. (2006). The contribution of prosody to the perception of foreign accent. Phonetica, 63, 247–267.Google Scholar
Braun, B., Dainora, A., & Ernestus, M. (2011). An unfamiliar intonation contour slows down online speech comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 350–375.Google Scholar
Braun, B., Lemhöfer, K., & Mani, N. (2011). Perceiving unstressed vowels in foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 376–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmichael, L. (2000). Measurable degrees of foreign accent: A correlational study of production, perception, and acquisition (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Carter, P. M. (2005). Prosodic variation in SLA: Rhythm in an urban North Carolina Hispanic community. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 11(2), 59–71.Google Scholar
Chen, A., Gussenhoven, C., & Rietveld, T. (2004). Language specificity in perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning. Language and Speech, 47, 311–349.Google Scholar
Chen, G. T. (1974). The pitch range of English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2, 159–171.Google Scholar
Cruz-Ferreira, M. (1987). Non-native interpretive strategies for intonational meaning: An experimental study. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 103–120). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Forus.Google Scholar
Cruz-Ferreira, M. (1989). A test for non-native comprehension of intonation in English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 17, 23–39.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (2005). Lexical stress. In Pisoni, D. B. & Remez, R. E. (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 264–289). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40, 141–201.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Pasveer, D. (2006). Explaining cross-linguistic differences in effects of lexical stress on spoken-word recognition. In Hoffmann, R. & Mixdorff, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 237–240). Dresden, Germany: TUD Press.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. (2008). Curriculum issues in teaching pronunciation to second language learners. In Hansen Edwards, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 347–369). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1–16.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastian, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406–421.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106, 682–706.Google Scholar
Gandour, J. (1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149–175.Google Scholar
Grabe, E., Rosner, B. S., García-Albea, J. E., & Zhou, X. (2003). Perception of English intonation by English, Spanish, and Chinese listeners. Language and Speech, 46, 375–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grenon, I., & White, L. (2008). Acquiring rhythm: A comparison of L1 and L2 speakers of Canadian English and Japanese. In Chan, H., Jacob, H., & Kapia, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 155–166). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gut, U. (2003). Prosody in second language speech production: The role of the native language. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen, 32, 133–152.Google Scholar
Gut, U. (2009). Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jilka, M. (2000). The contribution of intonation to the perception of foreign accent (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38, 301–315.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Y., Vakoch, D., & Wurm, L. (1996). Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 527–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Magen, H. (1998). The perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennen, I. (2004). Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 543–563.Google Scholar
Mennen, I., Schaeffler, F., & Docherty, G. (2012). Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: A comparison of English and German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 2249–2260.Google Scholar
Miracle, W. C. (1989). Tone production of American students of Chinese: A preliminary acoustic study. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24, 49–65.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. (1995). Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 17–34.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. (2008). Foreign accent and speech intelligibility. In Hansen Edwards, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 193–218). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 451–468.Google Scholar
Pickering, L. (2004). The structure and function of intonational paragraphs in native and nonnative speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 19–43.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.Google Scholar
Price, P. J., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2956–2970.Google Scholar
Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 213–223.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 193–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, X. S. (1989). Toward a register approach in teaching Mandarin tones. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24, 27–47.Google Scholar
Shen, X. S. (1990). Ability of learning the prosody of an intonational language by speakers of a tonal language: Chinese speakers learning French prosody. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 28, 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53, 273–293.Google Scholar
Tajima, K., Port, R., & Dalby, J. (1997). Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 1–24.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2008). Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 553–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2007). Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five suprasegmentals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Els, T., & de Bot, K. (1987). The role of intonation in foreign accent. Modern Language Journal, 71, 147–155.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1033–1044.Google Scholar
Wayland, R., & Guion, S. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54, 681–712.Google Scholar
White, L., & Mattys, S. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 501–522.Google Scholar