Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T13:17:30.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methods in Second Language Classroom-Oriented Research

A Critical Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

David Nunan
David Nunan
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this article, the current state of second language classroom-oriented research is subjected to critical review. The article begins by providing a brief overview of aims and issues in classroom-oriented research, before focusing more specifically on methodological issues in research. The review is based on an analysis of 50 empirical investigations of teaching and learning. These studies are analyzed in terms of their rationale, the environment in which they were carried out, the design and method of data collection, and the type of analysis carried out on the data. In the final part of the article, the implications of the study for future classroom research are presented and discussed.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 249 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J., Fröhlich, M., & Spada, N. (1984). The communicative orientation of second language teaching. In Handscombe, J., Orem, R., & Taylor, B. (Eds.), On TESOL 83 (pp. 231–252). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. (1983). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 67–103). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bailey, N., Madden, C, & Krashen, S. (1974). Is there a ‘natural’ sequence in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 21, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, L. V., Kemmis, S., & Gillard, G. (Eds.). (1982). Perspectives on case study. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. (1983). Risk-taking and the language learner. In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 39–65), Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bialystock, E. (1983). Inferencing: Testing the“hypothesis-testing” hypothesis. In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 39–66). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Brock, C. (1986). The effect of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. (1985). Requests for specific language input: Differences between older and younger adult language learners. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 272–281). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Cathcart, R. (1986). Situational differences and the sampling of young children's school language. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 118–140). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Cazden, C., Cancino, E., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. (1975). Second language acquisition sequences in children, adolescents and adults. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Education, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1983). Foreigner talk in the classroom-An aid to learning? In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 127–145). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1985). A method for examining the input/intake distinction. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 285–300). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1986a). The interaction of quantitative and qualitative approaches to research: A view of the second language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 709–717.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1986b). Teachers' priorities in correcting learners' errors in French immersion classes. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 64–84). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C., & Richards, J. (1986). The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures. Applied Linguistics, 7, 113–127.Google Scholar
Christie, F. (1985). Language education. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1985). Research methods in education. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Day, R. (1985). The use of the target language in context and second language proficiency. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 257–271). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Doughty, C, & Pica, T. (1986). “Information gap” tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 245–258). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37–53.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, M., Bailey, N., & Madden, C. (1982). It takes two: Contrasting tasks and contrasting structures. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 381–393.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1985a). Teacher-pupil interaction in second language development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 69–85). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1985b). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.Google Scholar
Faerch, C, & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1987). Introspection in second language research. Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Fathman, A., & Precup, L. (1983). Influences of age and setting on second language oral proficiency. In Bailey, K., Long, M. H., & Peck, S. (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies (pp. 151–161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. (forthcoming). Collaboration and co-constructing a shared understanding of a second language classroom. In Nunan, D. (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaies, S. (1983). Learner feedback: An exploratory study of its role in the second language classroom. In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 190–213). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149–161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Grotjahn, R. (1987). On the methodological basis of introspective methods. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 54–81). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hawkey, R. (1987). Language learner characteristics and classroom interaction: An experiment and its implications. In Das, B. (Ed.), Communication and learning in the classroom community (pp. 130–159). Singapore: RELC.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, G. (1986). Quantitative methods in language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly 20, 701–708.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1986). Sex differences and language use in the ESL classroom. In Das, B. (Ed.), Communication and learning in the classroom community (pp. 5–36). Singapore: RELC.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. (1985). Syntactic and morphological progressions in learner English. Canberra, Australia: Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. (1987). Understanding learner language. In Nunan, D. (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 5–44). Adelaide: NCRC.Google Scholar
Kirk, J., & Miller, M. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kleifgen, J. A. (1985). Skilled variation in a kindergarten teacher's use of foreigner talk. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 59–68). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. (1983). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 217–245). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. (1985). Great expectations: Second language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6, 173–189.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1980). Inside the“black box”: Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377–393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1986, April). Intervention points in second language classroom processes. Paper presented at the RELC Regional Seminar, Singapore.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions. In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268–285). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. (1984). Pluto's republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (Ed.) (1987a). Applying second language acquisition research. Adelaide: NCRC.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1987b). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41, 136–145.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classrooms. London: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
Nystrom, N. J. (1983). Teacher-student interaction in bilingual classrooms: Four approaches to error feedback. In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 169–188). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Parker, K., & Chaudron, C. (1987, April). The effects of linguistic simplification and elaborative modifications on 12 comprehension. Paper presented at the 21st Annual TESOL Convention, Miami.Google Scholar
Perkins, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1975). The effect of formal language instruction on the order of morpheme acquisition. Language Learning, 25, 237–243.Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1983). The role of language context in second language acquisition. Inter language Studies Bulletin, 7, 101–123.Google Scholar
Pica, T, & Long, M. H. (1986). The linguistic and conversational performance of experienced and inexperienced teachers. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 85–98). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politzer, R. (1970). Some reflections on ‘good’ and ‘bad’ language teaching behaviours. Language Learning, 20, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, P. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200–222). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Reichardt, C. S., & Cook, T. D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In Cook, T. D. & Reichardt, C. S. (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (pp. 7–32). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Rulon, K., & McCreary, J. (1986). Negotiation of content: Teacher-fronted and small group interaction. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 182–199). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (1985). Cultural input in second language learning. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 51–58). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Scherer, G., & Wertheimer, M. 1964. A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schinke-Llano, L. (1983). Foreigner talk in content classrooms. In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 146–168). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schinke-Llano, L. (1986). Foreigner talk in joint cognitive activities. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 99–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. N. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. (1983). Learner interaction in the classroom and its effects on language acquisition. In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 246–266). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Seliger, H., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (1983). Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Smith, L. M., & Geoffrey, W. (1968). The complexities of an urban classroom: An analysis toward a general theory of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Spada, N. (1990). Observing classroom behaviours and learning outcomes in different second language programs. In Richards, J. & Nunan, D. (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 293–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strong, M. (1986). Teacher language to limited English speakers in bilingual and submersion classrooms. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 53–63). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Teleni, V., & Baldauf, R. B. (1988). Statistical techniques used in three applied linguistics journals; Language Learning, Applied Linguistics and TESOL Quarterly 1980–1986: Implications for readers and researchers. Unpublished manuscript, James Cook University of Northern Queensland.Google Scholar
Towell, R. (1987). Variability and progress in the language development of advanced learners of a foreign language. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Second language acquisition in context (pp. 113–127). London: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
Van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wallace, C. (1987). Variability and the reading behaviour of L2 readers. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Second language acquisition in context (pp. 165–178). London: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. B., & Ready, D. (1985). Foreigner talk in the university classroom. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 89–114). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Weinert, R. (1987). Processes in classroom second language development: The acquisition of negation in German. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Second language acquisition in context (pp. 83–99). London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Willing, K. (1988). Learning styles in adult migrant education. Adelaide, Australia: NCRC.Google Scholar
Wong-Fillmore, L. (1985). When does teacher talk work as input? In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 17–50). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar