Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T23:42:24.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Acquisition of Esperanto1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Dan Maxwell
Affiliation:
Buro voor Systeemontwikkeling, Utrecht

Extract

The claim of Esperantists that their language is easier to learn than natural languages has seldom been subjected to an empirical test, and the few tests that have been carried out are not widely known outside the Esperanto community. After an introduction to the Esperanto movement and other experiments based on the teaching of Esperanto, the two “Five-country Experiments” carried out in the 1970s are described and evaluated here. The findings of these tests support the claim of Esperantists but could be challenged mainly because of the wide range of variable factors involved in language learning. These experiments are nevertheless valuable as an attempt to measure some of these variables in a very precise way.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fisher, A. (1921). Modern languages by way of Esperanto. Modern Languages, 2, 179182.Google Scholar
Forster, P. G. (1982). The Esperanto movement. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, H. G. (1978). Grundlagen und sprachpädagogische Anwendung einer informationstheoretischen Transferanalyse [Foundations and language-oriented application of a transfer analysis according to information theory]. Grundlagenstudien aus Kybernetik, und Geisteswissenschaft, 19, 7588.Google Scholar
Frank, H. G. (1983). Kybernetische Theorie und empirische Ergebnisse des Sprachorientierungsunterrichts [Cybernetic theory and empirical results of language orientation teaching]. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung, 36, 686699.Google Scholar
Frank, H. G. (1984). Zur Optimierung der Zeitverteilung bei Transferbewirkung durch Lehrstoffmodelle [On the optimization of time distribution in the effect of transfer by means of teaching models]. Grundlagenstudien aus Kybernetik und Geisteswissenschaft, 25, 313.Google Scholar
Fukuda, Y. (1980). Zur rationalisierten Fremdsprach-Lehrplanung unter Berücksichtigung der (z.B.deutschen oder japanischen) Muttersprache [On rationalized foreign language instruction taking the native language (e.g., German or Japanese) into consideration]. Grundlagenstudien aus Kybernetik und Wissenschaft, 21, 116.Google Scholar
Halloran, J. H. (1952). A four year experiment in Esperanto as an introduction to French. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 22, 200204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapenna, I., Lins, U., & Carlevaro, T. (1974). Esperanto en Perspektivo [Esperanto in perspective]. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
Large, A. (1985). The Artificial Language Movement. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Markarian, R. (1964). The educational value of Esperanto teaching in the schools. In Schultz, R. & Schultz, V. (Compilers), Esperanto: The solution to our language problems (pp. 362386). Baileboro, Ontario, Canada: Esperanto Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . (1960). Gorgias. (Hamilton, E., Trans, and Ed.) New York: Penguin. (Original work, c. 390 B.C.).Google Scholar
Sonnabend, H. (1979). Esperanto: lerneja eksperimento—raporto, analizo, konkludo [Esperanto: Teaching experiment—report, analysis, conclusion]. Pisa: Edistudio.Google Scholar
Szerdahelyi, I. (1975). La Internacia Pedagogia-Didaktika Eksperimento Kvinlanda: La rezultoj de la unua mezurado [The International pedagogical five-country teaching experiment: The results of the first measurement]. In Behrmann, H. (Ed.), Lehrplanerische Rationalisierung des Sprachunterrichts [Rationalization of the language instruction in the teaching program]. Paderborn: Institut fuer Kybernetische Pädagogik.Google Scholar
Szerdahelyi, I., & Frank, H. G. (1976). Zur pädagogischer Bestimmung relativer Schwierigkeiten verschiedener Sprachen [On the pedagogical determination of the relative difficulty of various languages]. Grundlagenstudien aus Kybernetik und Geisteswissenschaft, 17, 3944.Google Scholar
Wood, R. (1975). Teaching the interlanguage [Special issue]. Lektos, 6181.Google Scholar