Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T16:09:06.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Exploratory Study of Self Reported Language Learning Behaviors and their Relation to Achievement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Robert L. Politzer
Affiliation:
Stanford University

Abstract

Ninety undergraduate students enrolled in Foreign language courses in French, Spanish and German were asked to respond to a questionnaire concerning their engagement in certain selected learning behaviors culled from recent literature on good language learners. The data reported by the students are described and analyzed according to level of language course, and language. They are also related to student's grades and instructors' evaluations of students' progress, effort and voluntary classroom participation. The main finding is that there is some evidence for a link between certain behaviors and student achievement. However, links between learning behavior and achievement seem dependent on course level and methodology, and suggest the possibility of a learning behavior/treatment interaction.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohen, A. D. and Hosenfeld, C. 1981. Some use of Mentalistic Data in Second Language Research. Language Learning 3, 285314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C. 1980. On the Validity of Affective Variables in Second Language Acquisition: Conceptual, Contextual, and Statistical Consideration. Language Learning, 30, 255270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C. and Lambert, W. E. 1972. Attitude and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. and Gliksman, L. 1982. ‘On Gardner on Affect’: A Discussion of Validity as it Relates to Attitude/Motivation Battery: A Response from Gardner. Language Learning, 32, 191200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gliksman, L., Smythe, P. C. and Gardner, R. C. 1982. The Role of the Integrative Motive in Students Participation in the French Classroom. The Canadian Modem Language Review/La revue canadienne des langu.es vivantes, 38, 625647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, R. 1970. ‘Direct Method Experience at College and University Level’ in Hester, P. (ed.). Teaching a Living Language, New York: Harper and Row, pp. 8598.Google Scholar
Hosenfeld, C. 1977. A Preliminary Investigation of Reading Strategies of Successful and non-successful Second Language Learner, System, 5, 110, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovac, C. 1978. Successful Language Learners: What do we Know about them? ERIC/CLL News Bulletin, Arlington, CA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.D. 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning, Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H. H. and Todesco, A. 1978. The Good Language Learner, Toronto, Ontario Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. 1982. Gardner on Affect: A Reply To Gardner. Language Learning, 32, 183190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, J. W. and Perkins, K. 1978. Intelligence and Language Proficiency as a Source of Variance in Self Reported Affective Variable. Language Learning, 28, 8597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politzer, R. L. and McGroarty, M. 1983. A Discrete Point Test of Communicative Competence, IRAL, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. 1976. What the Good Language Learner Can Teach Us. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 7789.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. 1981. The Study of Cognitive Processes in Second Language Teaching, Applied Linguistics, 2, 117131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. and Thompson, I. 1982. How to be a More Successful Language Learner, Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar