Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-sz5hq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-03T08:03:01.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CAN SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR BE LEARNED THROUGH LISTENING?: An Experimental Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2005

Nel De Jong
Nel De Jong
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines whether aural processing of input in a situation of implicit instruction can build a knowledge base that is available for both comprehension and production tasks. Fifty-five Dutch students learned a miniature linguistic system based on Spanish. Three training conditions were compared in which noun-adjective gender agreement was the learning target. The first group of participants received receptive training, the second group received receptive and productive training, and a third group served as a control. The control group received no training of the target structure and only read an explanation of the target structure rule. Receptive knowledge was assessed with a self-paced listening test, a match-mismatch test, and a grammaticality judgment task. Productive knowledge was tested with a picture description task in single- and dual-task conditions. A postexperimental questionnaire tested whether any explicit knowledge had been induced. Results suggest that the receptive and receptive + productive training programs succeeded in building a knowledge base that was used in comprehension but much less so in production. These results will be interpreted in light of processing and the distinction between implicit and explicit knowledge.I would like to express my gratitude to Jan Hulstijn and Rob Schoonen from the University of Amsterdam for their supervision. I would also like to thank the two anonymous SSLA reviewers for their comments and Nick Ellis for taking time to discuss this project with me.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 205 - 234
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R., & Fincham, J. (1994). Acquisition of procedural skills from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 1322–1340.Google Scholar
Asher, J. J. (1982). Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher's guidebook ( 2nd ed.). Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–73). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. (2003). Online syntactic processing in aphasia: Studies with auditory moving window presentation. Brain and Language, 84, 222–249.Google Scholar
Davies, N. F. (1980). Putting receptive skills first: an experiment in sequencing. Canadian Modern Language Review, 36, 461–467.Google Scholar
De Jong, N. (2005). Learning second-language grammar by listening. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Deevy, P. L. (2000). Agreement checking in comprehension: Evidence from relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 69–79.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195–221.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell.
DeKeyser, R. M., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P., & Harrington, M. (2002). What gets processed in processing instruction? A commentary on Bill VanPatten's “Processing instruction: An update.” Language Learning, 52, 805–823.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., & Sokalski, K. J. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46, 613–642.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 63–103). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Anes, M. D., Weeks, P. A., & McFarlane, D. K. (1996). Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken-language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving-window technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 22, 324–335.Google Scholar
Gilhooly, K. J., Logie, R. H., & Wynn, V. (1999). Syllogistic reasoning tasks, working memory, and skill. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 473–498.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193–223.Google Scholar
Izumi, S. (2003). Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative clauses by learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 53, 285–323.Google Scholar
Juffs, A. (1998). Some effects of first language argument structure and morphosyntax on second language sentence processing. Second Language Research, 14, 406–424.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. (1969). Twenty-five centuries of language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Kennison, S. M. (2002). Comprehending noun phrase arguments and adjuncts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 65–81.Google Scholar
Konieczny, L. (2000). Locality and parsing complexity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(6), 627–645.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45–77). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach. London: Pergamon.
McGraw, K. O., Tew, M. D., & Williams, J. E. (2000). The integrity of web-delivered experiment: Can you trust the data? Psychological Science, 11, 508–512.Google Scholar
Nord, J. R. (1980). Developing listening fluency before speaking: an alternative paradigm. System, 8, 1–22.Google Scholar
Nord, J. R. (1981). Three steps leading to listening fluency: A beginning. In H. Winitz (Ed.), The comprehension approach to foreign language instruction (pp. 69–100). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393–419). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K. (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 427–456.Google Scholar
Sanz, C. (1997). Experimental tasks in SLA research: Amount of production, modality, memory, and production processes. In W. R. Glass & A. T. Pérez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish: Vol. 2. Production, processing, and comprehension (pp. 41–56). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Schmidt, R. (1994a). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1994b). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165–209). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schmidt, W. C. (2001). Presentation accuracy of Web animation methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 187–200.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–163.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1999). Let's make up your mind: “Special nativists” perspectives on language, modularity of mind, and nonnative language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 635–655.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. A. (1994). The unruly world of language. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 33–43). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 740–759.Google Scholar
Titone, R. (1968). Teaching foreign languages: An historical sketch. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
VanPatten, B. (2002a). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755–803.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2002b). Processing the content of input-processing and processing instruction research: A response to DeKeyser, Salaberry, Robinson, and Harrington. Language Learning, 52, 825–831.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993a). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–243.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993b). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. Modern Language Journal, 77, 45–57.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495–510.Google Scholar
Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Münte, T. F., Heinze, H.-J., & Clahsen, H. (2002). Word order in sentence processing: An experimental study of verb placement in German. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 211–268.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1–48.Google Scholar
Winitz, H. (Ed.). (1981a). Native language and foreign language acquisition. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Winitz, H. (1981b). A reconsideration of comprehension and production in language training. In H. Winitz (Ed.), The comprehension approach to foreign language instruction (pp. 101–140). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.