Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Kazuya Saito (a1) and Xianghua Wu (a2)

The current study examined how form-focused instruction (FFI) with and without corrective feedback (CF) as output enhancement facilitated second language (L2) perception of Mandarin tones at both the phonetic and phonological levels by 41 Cantonese learners of Mandarin. Two experimental groups, FFI only and FFI-CF, received a 90-min FFI treatment designed to encourage them to notice and practice the categorical distinctions of Mandarin tones through a range of communicative input and output activities. During these activities, the instructors provided CF only to students in the FFI-CF group by recasting and pushing them to repair their mispronunciations of the target features (i.e., output enhancement). The control group received comparable meaning-oriented instruction without any FFI. The effectiveness of FFI was assessed via a forced-choice identification task with both trained and untrained items for a variety of tonal contrasts in Mandarin (high-level Tone 1 vs. mid-rising Tone 2 vs. high-falling Tone 4). According to statistical comparisons, the FFI-only group attained significant improvement in all lexical and tonal contexts, and such effectiveness was evident particularly in the acquisition of Tone 1 and Tone 4—supposedly the most difficult instances due to their identical phonological status in the learners’ first language, Cantonese. The FFI-CF group, however, demonstrated marginally significant gains only under the trained lexical conditions. The results suggest that FFI promotes learners’ attentional shift from vocabulary to sound learning (generalizable gains in trained and untrained items) and facilitates their access to new phonetic and phonological categories. Yet the relative advantage of adding CF to FFI as output enhancement remains unclear, especially with respect to the less experienced L2 learners in the current study.

Corresponding author
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kazuya Saito, School of Commerce, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishi Waseda, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8050, Japan. E-mail:
Hide All
Abrahamsson, N. (2012). Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 187214.
Abramson, A. S. (1975). The tones of central Thai: Some perceptual experiments. In Harris, J. G. & Chamberlain, J. R. (Eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney (pp. 116). Bangkok, Thailand: Central Institute of English Language.
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543574.
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2006). Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 231250.
Bauer, R. S., & Benedict, P. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honour of James Emil Flege (pp. 1334). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2011). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3) [Computer software]. Retrieved from
Bradlow, A. R., & Pisoni, D. B. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener- and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 20742085.
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2011). Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 433461.
Chao, Y. R. (1948). Mandarin primer: An intensive course in spoken Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Conboy, B. T., & Kuhl, P. K. (2011). Impact of second-language experience in infancy: Brain measures of first- and second-language speech perception. Developmental Science, 14, 242248.
Couper, G. (2006). The short and long-term effects of pronunciation instruction. Prospect, 21, 4666.
Cutler, A., & Broersma, M. (2005). Phonetic precision in listening. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Mackenzie Beck, J. (Eds.), A figure of speech: A Festschrift for John Laver (pp. 6391). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 379397.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on forms in classroom second language acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 146.
Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 399423.
Field, J. (2008). Emergent and divergent: A view of second language listening research. System, 36, 29.
Flege, J. E. (1993). Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 15891608.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Flege, J. E. (2003) Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Schiller, N. O. & Meyer, A. S. (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 319355). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., Walley, A. C., & Randazza, L. A. (1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 155188.
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 31253134.
Fraser, H. (2011). Teaching teachers to teach /r/ and /l/ to Japanese learners of English: An integrated approach. In Ashby, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference (pp. 1115). Retrieved from
Gandour, J. (1981). Perceptual dimensions of tone: Evidence from Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 9, 2036.
Gandour, J. T. (1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149175.
Gaskell, G., & Dumay, N. (2003). Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words. Cognition, 89, 105132.
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 325353.
Hardison, D. (2003). Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 495522.
Hashimoto, O. K. Y. (1972). Phonology of Cantonese. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Imai, S., Walley, A. C., & Flege, J. E. (2005). Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 896907.
Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /ɹ/-/l/ to Japanese adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 32673278.
Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 1185011857.
Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech learning “gated” by the social brain? Developmental Science, 10, 110120.
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M., & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 90969101.
Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Transfer appropriate processing as a model for class second language acquisition. In Han, Z. (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 2744). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Lin, M. C. (1988). Putonghua shengdiao de shengxue xingzhi yu zhijue zhengzhao [Acoustic properties and perceptual cues of Mandarin tones]. Zhongguo Yuwen, 204, 437445.
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Yamada, T. (1994). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 20762087.
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874886.
Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183218.
Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 140.
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471497.
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338356.
McClelland, J. L., Fiez, J. A., & McCandliss, B. D. (2002). Teaching the [r]-[l] discrimination to Japanese adults: Behavioral and neural aspects. Physiology & Behavior, 77, 657662.
Munro, M., & Derwing, T. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 451468.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Nguyen, T., Pham, T., & Pham, M. (2012). The relative effects of explicit and implicit form focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 416434.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417528.
Piske, T. (2007). Implications of James E. Flege’s research for the foreign language classroom. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honour of James Emil Flege (pp. 331347). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral language abilities: The Awareness-Practice-Feedback sequence. In DeKeyser, R. (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141160). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Saito, K. (2013a). The acquisitional value of recasts in instructed second language speech learning: Teaching the perception and production of English /ɹ/ to adult Japanese learners. Language Learning, 63, 499529.
Saito, K. (2013b). Communicative focus on second language phonetic form: Teaching Japanese learners to perceive and produce English /ɹ/ without explicit instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0142716413000271
Saito, K. (2013c). Reexamining effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development: The role of explicit phonetic information. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 129.
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012a). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62, 595633.
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012b). Investigating the pedagogical potential of recasts for L2 vowel acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 387398.
Schmitt, N. (2008). State of the art: Instructed second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329363.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165179.
Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361392.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301322). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /ɹ/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243261.
Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R. (2013). Comprehension-based versus production-based grammar instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Language Learning, 63, 296329.
So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53, 273293.
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 29, 7387.
Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44, 225236.
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42, 181207.
Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & White, J. L. (2005). The importance of form/meaning mappings in explicit form-focused instruction. In Housen, A. & Pierrard, M. (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 199234). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263308.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471484). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thomson, R. I. (2012). Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning, 62, 12311258.
Trofimovich, P., Collins, L., Cardoso, W., White, J., & Horst, M. (2012). A frequency-based approach to L2 phonological learning: Teacher input and student output in an intensive ESL context. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 176186.
Trofimovich, P., & Gatbonton, E. (2006). Repetition and focus on form in L2 Spanish word processing: Implications for pronunciation instruction. Modern Language Journal, 90, 519535.
VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755803.
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225243.
Walley, A. C. (2007). Speech learning, lexical reorganization, and the development of word recognition by native and non-native English speakers. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honour of James Emil Flege (pp. 315330). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 10331043.
Wang, Y., Spence, M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 36493658.
Wong, M. K. S. (1982). Tone Change in Cantonese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Wu, X., Munro, M., & Wang, Y. (2011). The effects of linguistic experience on perceptual assimilation of lexical tone. Proceedings of 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 21692172). Retrieved from
Yu, A. C. L. (2007). Understanding near mergers: The case of morphological tone in Cantonese. Phonology, 24, 187214.
Zee, E. (1999). Chinese (Hong Kong Cantonese). In International Phonetic Association (Ed.), Handbook of the International Phonetic Association (pp. 5860). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed