Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 50
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Azizi, Arash 2016. Effects of Non-negotiated Pre-modified Input, Negotiation of Input without Output, and Negotiation of Input plus Pushed Output on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 7, Issue. 4, p. 773.

    Ciriza-Lope, Maria Shappeck, Marco and Arxer, Steven 2016. Emergent Target Language Identities Among Latino English Language Learners. Journal of Latinos and Education, Vol. 15, Issue. 4, p. 287.

    Huang, Hui 2016. The Effect of Output Task on EFL Writing: How Far Can It Go?. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 440.

    Zhao, Ting and Macaro, Ernesto 2016. What works better for the learning of concrete and abstract words: teachers' L1 use or L2-only explanations?. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 75.

    Goo, Jaemyung Granena, Gisela Yilmaz, Yucel and Novella, Miguel 2015. Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages.

    Hamavandy, Mehraban and Golshan, Mohammad 2015. Differential Potential of SLA Output Tasks versus Input-based Teaching of English Grammar: A Comparative Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 5, Issue. 10, p. 2083.

    Rostamzadeh, Maryam Youhanaee, Manijeh and Barati, Hossein 2015. Incidental acquisition of receptive versus productive knowledge of adjective-noun order in the first exposure through input-based tasks: A case of Iranian young learners of English. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, Vol. 4, Issue. 1,

    Sherris, Ari and Burns, M. Susan 2015. New border crossings for the interaction hypothesis: the effects of feedback on Gonja speakers learning English in a rural school in Ghana. Pedagogies: An International Journal, Vol. 10, Issue. 3, p. 238.

    Assia, Baghdadi and Said, Keskes 2014. The impact of small group interaction on learners’ grammatical accuracy achievement. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, Vol. 3, Issue. 2,

    Shintani, Natsuko 2014. Using tasks with young beginner learners: the role of the teacher. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, Vol. 8, Issue. 3, p. 279.

    Kitajima, Ryu 2013. Interactional features of repair negotiation in NS–NNS interaction on two task types: Information gap and personal information exchange. Linguistics and Education, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 165.

    Nayak, Gopa and Sylva, Kathy 2013. The effects of a guided reading intervention on reading comprehension: a study on young Chinese learners of English in Hong Kong. The Language Learning Journal, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 85.

    Mackey, Alison and Goo, Jaemyung 2012. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.

    Mi-ri Ahn, and JeongDongBin, 2012. The Effects of Web-based Explicit Listening Strategy Instruction on Listening Achievement.. The Journal of Foreign Studies, Issue. 19, p. 33.

    2012. Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy.

    ADAMS, REBECCA NUEVO, ANA MARÍA and EGI, TAKAKO 2011. Explicit and Implicit Feedback, Modified Output, and SLA: Does Explicit and Implicit Feedback Promote Learning and Learner-Learner Interactions?. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 95, p. 42.

    Rai, Manpreet K. Loschky, Lester C. Harris, Richard Jackson Peck, Nicole R. and Cook, Lindsay G. 2011. Effects of Stress and Working Memory Capacity on Foreign Language Readers’ Inferential Processing During Comprehension. Language Learning, Vol. 61, Issue. 1, p. 187.

    Shahraki, Sara Hashemi and Kassaian, Zohreh 2011. Effects of learner interaction, receptive and productive learning tasks on vocabulary acquisition: An Iranian case. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 15, p. 2165.

    Vidal, Karina 2011. A Comparison of the Effects of Reading and Listening on Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition. Language Learning, Vol. 61, Issue. 1, p. 219.

    Cho, Min Young 2010. The effects of input enhancement and written recall on noticing and acquisition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 71.

  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Volume 16, Issue 3
  • September 1994, pp. 303-323

Comprehensible Input and Second Language Acquisition: What is the Relationship?

  • Lester Loschky (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 November 2008

This study attempts to test aspects of the input hypothesis (Krashen, 1980, 1983, 1985) and Long's modification of it (Long, 1980, 1983a, 1985). Specifically, it experimentally tests the hypothesis that both input and interactional modifications facilitate second language acquisition, using Japanese as the target language. Three experimental groups were differentiated in terms of input and interaction conditions: (1) unmodified input with no interaction, (2) premodified input with no interaction, and (3) unmodified input with the chance for negotiated interaction. The groups were compared in terms of (a) their degree of comprehension of the input and (b) their subsequent retention of vocabulary items and acquisition of two Japanese locative structures. The results indicated that moment-to-moment comprehension was highest for the negotiated interaction group, whereas there was no significant difference between the two noninteraction groups. Furthermore, there was no correlation found between differences in moment-to-moment comprehension and gains in vocabulary recognition and acquisition of structures, though significant gains on both measures were found for all three groups. Discussion of these findings centers on the relationship between comprehension and acquisition.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

G. Aston (1986). Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128143.

E. V. Clark , & B. F. Hecht (1983). Comprehension, production, and language acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 325349.

C. Doughty , & T. Pica (1986). Information gap tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305325.

C. Faerch , & G. Kasper (1986). The role of comprehension in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257274.

D. Foss (1988). Experimental psycholinguistics. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 301348.

C. Fraser , U. Bellugi , & R. Brown (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 125135.

K. Gregg (1984). Krashen's monitor and Occam's razor. Applied Linguistics, 5, 79100.

A. Herskovits (1985). Semantics and pragmatics of locative expressions. Cognitive Science, 9, 341378.

M. Long (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126141.

B. McLaughlin , T. Rossman , & B. McLeod (1983). Second-language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135158.

I. S. P. Nation (1982). Beginning to learn foreign language vocabulary: A review of the research. RELC Journal, 13, 1436.

T. Pica , R. Young , & C. Doughty (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737758.

J. Schachter (1984). A universal input condition. In W. Rutherford (Ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition (pp. 167183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

R. Schmidt (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129158.

C. Snow , A. Arlman-Rupp , Y. Hassing , J. Jobse , J. Joosten , & J. Yorster (1976). Mothers' speech in three social classes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 120.

E. Varonis , & S. Gass (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 7190.

L. White (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second-language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95110.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *