Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T03:18:28.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Decision Making in Second Language Acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

David Birdsong
Affiliation:
University of Texas

Abstract

The present paper isolates certain domain-general cognitive processes involved in decision making and examines their instantiations in adult second language acquisition (SLA). After reviewing important differences between mature and immature cognition, I discuss the epistemological categories and concepts that underlie decision making. I then address decision making from the point of view of fallibility—for example, maladaptive biases that mediate learners' decisions—and I suggest that some impediments to success in SLA may be the result of mature domain-general decision making. The heuristic value of research in the area of decision making is emphasized.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnoli, F., & Krantz, D. H. (1989). Suppression of natural heuristics by formal instruction: The case of the conjunction fallacy. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 515550.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structures: Implications for the nature of concepts. In Neisser, U. (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1993, 08). Signal detection and categorization in L2 decision making behaviors. Paper presented at the 10th World Congress of Applied Linguistics (AILA), Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, D. F., & Green, B. L. (1992). The adaptive nature of cognitive immaturity. The American Psychologist, 47, 4754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. M. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 4168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. (1991). The native speaker in applied linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(270), 1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, S. (1985). More evidence on competing cognitive systems. Second Language Research, 1, 4772.Google Scholar
Goldowsky, B. N., & Newport, E. L. (1993). Modeling the effects of processing limitations on the acquisition of morphology: The less is more hypothesis. In Clark, E. (Ed.), The proceedings of the 24th Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 124138). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R., & Wilson, R. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 65, 203257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1978). Giving learners a break: Native language intuitions as a source of predictions about transferability. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 15, 5992.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978). Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551578.Google Scholar
McNicol, D. (1972). A primer of signal detection theory. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Nagata, H. (1988). The relativity of linguistic intuitions: The effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, H. (1989). Effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments under objective and subjective self-awareness conditions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 255269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. L.(1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Borgida, E., Crandall, R., & Reed, H. (1982). Popular induction: Information is not necessarily informative. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 101116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. (1983). Part-of-speech anomalies in a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1927). Philosophy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 127158.Google Scholar
Smith, E. E.(1989). Concepts and induction. In Posner, M. I. (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 501526). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183203.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 11241131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanLehn, K. (1989). Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition. In Posner, M. I. (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 527579). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar