Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T07:22:14.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing the Ability to Perform Speech Acts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Andrew D. Cohen
Andrew D. Cohen
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper calls attention to an increasingly prominent field of interest within second language acquisition research and pedagogy, namely, that of pragmatic ability. It focuses on an area within pragmatics, that of speech acts, considers the processes underlying the performance of such speech acts, and looks at the effects of explicit instruction in this area. The paper starts by asking what speech act ability entails. Several basic distinctions are made in the description of speech acts, such as that between sociocultural and sociolinguistic ability. Second, directions of previous research describing speech acts are indicated and directions yet to be taken are pointed out. Difficulties in researching oral speech act performance are noted, and verbal report is recognized as one of a limited number of research tools available for investigating cognitive processes involved in speech act production. The paper then reviews four studies that utilize verbal report to gain at least some access to the underlying processes. Finally, the paper looks at previous research on the tutored and untutored acquisition of speech acts and provides suggestions for future research.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 253 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (1993). Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L. M. (1994, 03). Notebook data on power and the power of notebook data. Paper presented at the 28th Annual TESOL Convention, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Billmyer, K. (1990). “I really like your lifestyle”: ESL learners learning how to compliment. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 6, 31–48.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. (1982). Learning to say what you mean in a second language: A study of the speech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 3, 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Too many words: Length of utterance and pragmatic failure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1987). Using verbal reports in research on language learning. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 82–95). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1991). Feedback on writing: The use of verbal report. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (in press). Verbal reports as a source of insights on learner strategies. Applied Language Learning, 7 (1).Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1995). The role of language of thought in foreign language learning. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics (University of Pennsylvania), 11, 1–23.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1996). Speech acts in second language learning contexts. In McKay, S. & Hornberger, N. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 383–420). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1981). Developing a measure of sociocultural competence: The case of apology. Language Learning, 31, 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1993). The production of speech acts by ESL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D., Olshtain, E., & Rosenstein, D. S. (1986). Advanced EFL apologies: What remains to be learned? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 62, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Tarone, E. (1994). Describing and teaching speech act behavior: Stating and changing an opinion. In Barbara, L. & Scott, M. (Eds.), Reflections on language learning (pp. 110–121). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechert, H. W., & Raupach, M. (1989). Transfer in language production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1992). Learning to communicate: A study of two language learners' requests. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 20–60). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ferrara, K. (1994, 03). Pragmatic transfer in Americans' use of Japanese thanking routines. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics,Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Frescura, M. A. (1993). A sociolinguistic comparison of “reactions to complaints”: Italian L1 vs. English L1, Italian L2, and Italian as a community language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (1983). Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Greene, S., & Higgins, L. (1994). “Once upon a time”: The use of retrospective accounts in building theory in composition. In Smagorinsky, P. (Ed), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 115–140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (Eds.) (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1991). Compensatory strategies in second language research: A critique, a revision, and some (non-)implications for the classroom. In Phillipson, R. et al. (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 142–161). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Loveday, L. (1982). The sociolinguistics of learning and using a non-native language. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Motti, S. T. (1987). Competência comunicativa em lingua estrangeira: O uso de pedido de disculpas [Communicative competence in a foreign language: The use of apology]. Unpublished manuscript, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. D. (1983). Apology: A speech-act set. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 18–35). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. D. (1990). The learning of complex speech act behavior. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paribakht, T. (1985). Strategic competence and language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 6, 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulisse, N. (1990). The use of compensatory strategies by learners of English. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Riley, P. (1981). Towards a contrastive pragmalinguistics. In Fisiak, J. (Ed.), Contrastive linguistics and the language teacher (pp. 121–146). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. (1991). Introspective methodology in interlanguage pragmatics research. In Kasper, G. (Ed.), Pragmatics of Japanese as native and target language. (Technical Rep., Vol. 3, pp. 29–84). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W., & Richards, J. C. (1981). Speech acts and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 1, 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seliger, H. W. (1980). Utterance planning and correction behavior: Its function in the grammar construction process for second language learners. In Dechert, H. W. & Raupach, M. (Eds.), Temporal variables of speech (pp. 87–99). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Swanson-Owens, D., & Newell, G. E. (1994). Using intervention protocols to study the effects of instructional scaffolding on writing and learning. In Smagorinsky, P. (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 141–162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N., & Judd, E. (1983). Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar