Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

DOES REPEATED PRACTICE MAKE PERFECT? THE EFFECTS OF WITHIN-SESSION REPEATED RETRIEVAL ON SECOND LANGUAGE VOCABULARY LEARNING

  • Tatsuya Nakata (a1)
Abstract

Although research shows that repetition increases second language vocabulary learning, only several studies have examined the long-term effects of increasing retrieval frequency in one learning session. With this in mind, the present study examined the effects of within-session repeated retrieval on vocabulary learning. The study is original in that it (a) gave posttests after a delay greater than 2 weeks, (b) employed a paired-associate format to exert strict control over the treatment, (c) considered time-on-task as a factor, and (d) used the same target items for different frequency levels. In this study, 98 Japanese learners studied 16 English-Japanese word pairs using one of the following four retrieval frequency levels: one, three, five, or seven. Results showed that five and seven retrievals contributed to significantly higher scores than one and three retrievals regardless of the posttest timing. When time-on-task was controlled, however, one retrieval led to the largest gain.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Tatsuya Nakata, Faculty of Foreign Language Studies, Kansai University, 3-3-35 Yamate-cho, Suita-shi, Osaka 564-8680 Japan. E-mail: nakata@kansai-u.ac.jp
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

H. P.Bahrick , L. E.Bahrick , A. S.Bahrick , & P. EBahrick . (1993). Maintenance of foreign language vocabulary and the spacing effect. Psychological Science, 4, 316321.

JBarcroft . (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52, 323363.

JBarcroft . (2007). Effects of opportunities for word retrieval during second language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 57, 3556.

JBarcroft . (2015). Lexical input processing and vocabulary learning. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

M.-J.Bisson , W. J. B.van Heuven , K.Conklin , & R. JTunney . (2014). The role of repeated exposure to multimodal input in incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Language Learning, 64, 855877.

K. C.Bloom , & T. JShuell . (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. The Journal of Educational Research, 74, 245248.

N. J.Cepeda , H.Pashler , E.Vul , J. T.Wixted , & DRohrer . (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354380.

N. J.Cepeda , N.Coburn , D.Rohrer , J. T.Wixted , M. C.Mozer , & HPashler . (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236246.

C.Chen , & JTruscott . (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31, 693713.

IElgort . (2011). Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61, 367413.

I.Elgort , & PWarren . (2014). L2 vocabulary learning from reading: Explicit and tacit lexical knowledge and the role of learner and item variables. Language Learning, 64, 365414.

REllis . (1995). Modified oral input and the acquisition of word meanings. Applied Linguistics, 16, 409435.

T.Fitzpatrick , I.Al-Qarni , & PMeara . (2008). Intensive vocabulary learning: A case study. Language Learning Journal, 36, 239248.

K. SFolse . (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

K. SFolse . (2006). The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 273293.

J. H.Hulstijn , & BLaufer . (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539558.

E. LJudd . (1978). Vocabulary teaching and TESOL: A need for re-evaluation of existing assumptions. TESOL Quarterly, 12, 7176.

J. D.Karpicke , & H. LRoediger . (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966968.

NKornell . (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 12971317.

BLaufer . (2005). Focus on Form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA Yearbook, 5, 223250.

B.Laufer , & ZGoldstein . (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399436.

B.Laufer , & BRozovski-Roitblat . (2011). Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research, 15, 391411.

B.Laufer , & KShmueli . (1997). Memorizing new words: Does teaching have anything to do with it? RELC Journal, 28, 89108.

J. M.Logan , & D. ABalota . (2008). Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: Exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15, 257280.

J. AMondria . (2003). The effects of inferring, verifying, and memorizing on the retention of L2 word meanings: An experimental comparison of the “Meaning-Inferred Method” and the “Meaning-Given Method.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 473499.

J. A.Mondria , & BWiersma . (2004). Receptive, productive and receptive + productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make? In P.Bogaards & B.Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 79100). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

TNakata . (2011). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary learning in a paired-associate paradigm: A critical investigation of flashcard software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 1738.

TNakata . (2015b). Effects of feedback timing on second language vocabulary learning: Does delaying feedback increase learning? Language Teaching Research, 19, 416434.

I. S. PNation . (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 5982.

R.Oxford , & DCrookall . (1990). Vocabulary learning: A critical analysis of techniques. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 930.

EPeters . (2012). The differential effects of two vocabulary instruction methods on EFL word learning: A study into task effectiveness. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 50, 213238.

EPeters . (2014). The effects of repetition and time of post-test administration on EFL learners’ form recall of single words and collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18, 7594.

L.Plonsky , & F. LOswald . (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878912.

M. A.Pyc , & K. ARawson . (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437447.

H. L.Roediger , & K. MArnold . (2012). The one-trial learning controversy and its aftermath: Remembering Rock (1957). The American Journal of Psychology, 125, 127143.

J.Rogers , S.Webb , & TNakata . (2015). Do the cognacy characteristics of loanwords make them more easily learned than noncognates? Language Teaching Research, 19, 927.

D.Rohrer , K. M.Taylor , H.Pashler , J. T.Wixted , & N. JCepeda . (2005). The effect of overlearning on long-term retention. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 361374.

J. MRoyer . (1973). Memory effects for test-like-events during acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Psychological Reports, 32, 195198.

M. P.Steinel , J. H.Hulstijn , & WSteinel . (2007). Second language idiom learning in a paired-associate paradigm: Effects of direction of learning, direction of testing, idiom imageability, and idiom transparency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 449484.

E. LThorndike . (1908). Memory for paired associates. Psychological Review, 15, 122138.

H.van Zeeland , & NSchmitt . (2013). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41, 609624.

SWebb . (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 3352.

SWebb . (2007a). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28, 4665.

SWebb . (2007b). Learning word pairs and glossed sentences: The effects of a single context on vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 11, 6381.

SWebb . (2009). The effects of receptive and productive learning of word pairs on vocabulary knowledge. RELC Journal, 40, 360376.

K. T.Wissman , K. A.Rawson , & M. APyc . (2012). How and when do students use flashcards? Memory, 20, 568579.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Nakata supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (61 KB)
61 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score