Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • Tatsuya Nakata (a1)

Although expanding spacing is often regarded as the most effective practice schedule, studies comparing equal and expanding spacing have yielded mixed results. The present study set out to examine whether the amount of spacing and the retention interval may influence the effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language (L2) vocabulary learning. One hundred and twenty-eight Japanese college students studied 20 English-Japanese word pairs. The type of spacing (expanding and equal) and the amount of spacing (massed, short, medium, and long) were manipulated. Results demonstrated a limited, yet statistically significant, advantage of expanding spacing. The finding is significant because this is the first L2 study to find the superiority of expanding over equal spacing. The main effect of the amount of spacing was also significant, producing large effect sizes. Taken together, the results suggest that expanding spacing may facilitate vocabulary learning, although introducing spacing may have a larger effect.

Corresponding author
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Tatsuya Nakata, Faculty of Foreign Language Studies, Kansai University, 3-3-35 Yamate-cho, Suita-shi, Osaka Japan 564-8680. E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. A. Balota , J. M. Duchek , S. D. Sergent-Marshall , & H. L. Roediger (2006). Does expanded retrieval produce benefits over equal-interval spacing? Explorations of spacing effects in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer’s disease. Psychology and Aging, 21, 1931.

J. Barcroft (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52, 323363.

J. Barcroft (2007). Effects of opportunities for word retrieval during second language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 57, 3556.

S. K. Carpenter , & E. L. DeLosh (2005). Application of the testing and spacing effects to name learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 619636.

N. J. Cepeda , N. Coburn , D. Rohrer , J. T. Wixted , M. C. Mozer , & H. Pashler (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236246.

N. J. Cepeda , H. Pashler , E. Vul , J. T. Wixted , & D. Rohrer (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354380.

J. Cohen (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

E. Crothers , & P. Suppes (1967). Experiments in second language learning. New York, NY: Academic Press.

W. L. Cull (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215235.

J. L. Dobson (2011). Effect of selected “desirable difficulty” learning strategies on the retention of physiology information. Advances in Physiology Education, 35, 378383.

J. L. Dobson (2012). Effect of uniform versus expanding retrieval practice on the recall of physiology information. Advances in Physiology Education, 36, 612.

I. Elgort (2011). Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61, 367413.

N. C. Ellis (1995). The psychology of foreign language vocabulary acquisition: Implications for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8, 103128.

T. Fitzpatrick , I. Al-Qarni , & P. Meara (2008). Intensive vocabulary learning: A case study. Language Learning Journal, 36, 239248.

S. H. K. Kang , R. V. Lindsey , M. C. Mozer , & H. Pashler (2014). Retrieval practice over the long term: Should spacing be expanding or equal-interval? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 15441550.

J. D. Karpicke , & H. L. Roediger (2010). Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials? Memory and Cognition, 38, 116124.

J. M. Logan , & D. A. Balota (2008). Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: Exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15, 257280.

G. B. Maddox , D. A. Balota , J. H. Coane , & J. M. Duchek (2011). The role of forgetting rate in producing a benefit of expanded over equal spaced retrieval in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26, 661670.

J. Metcalfe , & N. Kornell (2007). Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 225229.

J.-A. Mondria (2003). The effects of inferring, verifying, and memorizing on the retention of L2 word meanings: An experimental comparison of the “Meaning-Inferred Method” and the “Meaning-Given Method.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 473499.

J.-A. Mondria , & B. Wiersma (2004). Receptive, productive and receptive + productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make? In B. Laufer (Ed.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 79100). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.

T. Nakata (2011). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary learning in a paired-associate paradigm: A critical investigation of flashcard software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 1738.

I. S. P. Nation (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

I. S. P. Nation (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 5982.

M. A. Pyc , & K. A. Rawson (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 35, 19171927.

M. A. Pyc , & K. A. Rawson (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437447.

R. A. Schmidt , & R. A. Bjork (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207217.

N. Schmitt (2007). Current trends in vocabulary learning and teaching. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), The international handbook of English language teaching (pp. 827842). Norwell, MA: Springer.

V. I. Schneider , A. F. Healy , & L. E. Bourne (2002). What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: Contextual interference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 419440.

U. Schuetze (2015). Spacing techniques in second language vocabulary acquisition: Short-term gains vs. long-term memory. Language Teaching Research, 19, 2842.

J. J. Shaughnessy , & E. B. Zechmeister (1992). Memory-monitoring accuracy as influenced by the distribution of retrieval practice. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 125128.

L. K. Son , & D. A. Simon (2012). Distributed learning: Data, metacognition, and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 379399.

M. P. Steinel , J. H. Hulstijn , & W. Steinel (2007). Second language idiom learning in a paired-associate paradigm: Effects of direction of learning, direction of testing, idiom imageability, and idiom transparency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 449484.

B. C. Storm , R. A. Bjork , & J. C. Storm (2010). Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: When and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention. Memory & Cognition, 38, 244253.

S. A. Webb (2009). The effects of pre-learning vocabulary on reading comprehension and writing. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65, 441470.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 241 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 619 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.