Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 123
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Abedi, Davoud Mahdavi, Zafarghandi Amir and Hassaskhah, Jaleh 2016. Iranian EFL learners’ preferred oral corrective feedback: High anxious learners vs. low anxious learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, Vol. 5, Issue. 2,

    Moghadam, Elaheh Shoja and Ghafournia, Narjes 2016. The effect of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on the use of collocations in speaking assignments by Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, Vol. 5, Issue. 5,

    Rische, Jacquelyn L. and Komarova, Natalia L. 2016. Regularization of languages by adults and children: A mathematical framework. Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 84, p. 1.

    Tavakoli, Manssor and Zarrinabadi, Nourollah 2016. Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, p. 1.

    Yilmaz, Yucel 2016. THE ROLE OF EXPOSURE CONDITION IN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXPLICIT CORRECTION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 38, Issue. 01, p. 65.

    Cheng, Xiongyong 2015. Interlanguage-based Error Analysis in Higher Vocational and Technological College EFL Education in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 639.

    Goo, Jaemyung Granena, Gisela Yilmaz, Yucel and Novella, Miguel 2015. Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages.

    Nguyen, Minh Thi Thuy Pham, Hanh Thi and Pham, Tam Minh 2015. The effects of input enhancement and recasts on the development of second language pragmatic competence. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, p. 1.

    VAN DE GUCHTE, MARRIT BRAAKSMA, MARTINE RIJLAARSDAM, GERT and BIMMEL, PETER 2015. Learning New Grammatical Structures in Task-Based Language Learning: The Effects of Recasts and Prompts. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 99, Issue. 2, p. 246.

    2015. Intelligent Web-Based English Instruction in Middle Schools.

    Ajabshir, Zahra Fakher 2014. The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Types of Feedback on Learners’ Pragmatic Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 98, p. 463.

    Cucchiarini, Catia and Strik, Helmer 2014. Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis.

    Cucchiarini, Catia and Strik, Helmer 2014. Computational Linguistics.

    Dixon, Edward M. and Hondo, Junko 2014. Re-purposing an OER for the online language course: a case study ofDeutsch Interaktivby the Deutsche Welle. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 109.

    Grümpel, Claudia Stoll, Pamela and Cifuentes, José Luis 2014. L3-Task: Language acquisition in a multilingual context: Blended tandems, L3-German/Spanish and a common second language (English). Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 382.

    Haifaa, Faqeih and Emma, Marsden 2014. Oral Corrective Feedback and Learning of English Modals. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 136, p. 322.

    LEE, Kyusong KWEON, Soo-ok LEE, Sungjin NOH, Hyungjong and LEE, Gary Geunbae 2014. POSTECH Immersive English Study (POMY): Dialog-Based Language Learning Game. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, Vol. E97.D, Issue. 7, p. 1830.

    Lim, Clarence and Dass, Rozita 2014. Examining Taylor’s Center for Languages IEN Students’ Perspectives on the Usefulness of Corrective Feedback in Writing Class. Journal for Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE), Vol. 4, Issue. 1,

    Moghaddam, Seyyed Reza Mousavi and Behjat, Fatemeh 2014. Overt-correction vs. Recasts and Grammar Performance of Iranian Male Learners of English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 5, Issue. 4,

    Nikoopour, Jahanbakhsh and Zoghi, Abdolsaleh 2014. Analyzing EFL Learners’ Errors: The Plausibility of Teachers’ Feedbacks and Students’ Uptakes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 5, Issue. 1,

  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Volume 15, Issue 3
  • September 1993, pp. 357-386

Explicit and Implicit Negative Feedback: An Empirical Study of the Learning of Linguistic Generalizations

  • Susanne Carroll (a1) and Merrill Swain (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 November 2008

The relative effects of various types of negative feedback on the acquisition of the English dative alternation by 100 adult Spanish-speaking learners of English as a second language were investigated. Our objective was to determine empirically whether feedback can help learners learn the appropriate abstract constraints on an overgeneral rule. All subjects were trained on the alternation, which was presented in terms of a simple structural change. Subjects were divided into groups according to the type of feedback they received when they made an error. Specifically, upon making an error, Group A subjects were given explicit metalinguistic information about the generalization we hoped they would learn. Group B subjects were told that their response was wrong. Group C subjects were corrected when they erred, giving them a model of the response desired along with implicit negative evidence that their response was incorrect. Group D subjects, having made an error, were asked if they were sure about their response. The comparison group received no feedback.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Birdsong (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

J. N. Bohannon III, & L. Stanowicz (1988). The issue of negative evidence: Adult responses to children's language errors. Developmental Psychology, 24, 684689.

C. Chaudron (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learner learner's errors. Language Learning, 27, 2946.

A. Chun , R. Day , N. Chenoweth , & S. Luppescu (1982). Errors, interaction, and correction: A study of native–nonnative conversations. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 537547.

F. I. M. Craik , & E. Tulving (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268294.

G. Crookes , & K. Rulon (1988). Topic continuation and corrective feedback in native–nonnative conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 675681.

R. Day , N. Chenoweth , A. Chun , & S. Luppescu (1984). Corrective feedback in native-nonnative discourse. Language Learning, 34, 1945.

R. Hawkins (1987). Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 3, 2055.

F. M. Holley , & J. K. King (1971). Imitation and correction in foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, 55, 494498.

J. F. Lalande II (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140149.

I. Mazurkewich (1984a). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language Learning, 34, 91109.

I. Mazurkewich , & L. White (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: Unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition, 16, 261283.

G. A. Miller , E. Galanter , & K. Pribram (1960). Plans and the structure of behaviour. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

D. Osherson , M. Stob , & S. Weinstein (1984). Learning theory and natural language. Cognition, 17, 128.

A. G. Ramirez , & N. P. Stromquist (1979). ESL methodology and student language learning in bilingual elementary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 145158.

T. Robb , S. Ross , & I. Shortreed (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 8393.

J. Schachter (1984). A universal input condition. In W. Rutherford (Ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition (pp. 167183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

J. Schachter (1986). Three approaches to the study of input. Language Learning, 36, 211225.

B. Schwartz (1986). The epistemological status of second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 2, 120159.

B. Schwartz , & M. Gubala-Ryzak (1992). Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2 A: Against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research, 8, 138.

H. D. Semke (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195202.

L. White (1989). Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

L. White (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133161.

M. Zock , G. Francopoulo , & A. Laroui (1989). SWIM: A natural interface for the scientifically minded language learner. Computers and the Humanities, 23, 411422.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *