Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Grammatically Judgments and Second Language Acquisition

  • Rod Ellis (a1)

This article takes a critical look at grammaticality judgment tasks in second language acquisition research. It begins by examining the theoretical assumptions that underlie grammaticality judgment tasks, pointing out that previous studies have reported considerable differences between the results obtained from grammaticality judgment tasks and from other, production-oriented tasks. A description of the design features of grammaticality judgment tasks that have been used to date is then provided. There follows an account of a small-scale study designed to investigate the nature of learner judgments. Twenty-one adult advanced Chinese learners of English were asked to judge sentences designed to test their knowledge of dative alternation. The results indicated that the learners rarely used the “not sure” option in the test. Eight of these subjects were then administered a reduced version of the original test as a think-aloud task 1 week later. The results showed that these learners were inconsistent in 22.5% of their judgments. The think-aloud protocols showed that they resorted to a variety of strategies in making judgments. The article concludes by arguing that grammaticality judgment tasks elicit a particular kind of performance that needs to be understood much more thoroughly before it is used as a basis for investigating second language acquisition.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

B. Arthur (1980). Gauging the boundaries of second language competence: A study of learner judgements. Language Learning, 30, 177194.

E. Bialystok (1979). Explicit and implicit judgements of L2 grammatically. Language Learning, 29, 81103.

R. Bley-Vroman , S. Felix , & G. loup (1988). The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, 4, 132.

J. Carroll , T. Bever , & C. Pollack (1981). The non uniqueness of linguistic intuitions. Language, 57, 368382.

C. Chaudron (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgements: A review of theory, methods and results. Language Learning, 33, 343377.

S. Gass (1983). The development of L2 intuitions. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 273291.

R. Hawkins (1987). Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 3, 2055.

I. Mazurkewich (1984a). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language Learning, 34, 91109.

J. Schachter (1974). An error in error analysis, language Learning, 24, 205214.

J. Schachter (1989). A new look at an old classic. Second Language Research, 5, 3042.

S. Tanaka (1987). The selective use of specific exemplars in second language performance: The case of dative alternation. Language Learning, 37, 6388.

L. White (1985). The ‘pro-drop’ parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 35, 4762.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 64 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 453 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.