Skip to main content
×
Home

Grammatically Judgments and Second Language Acquisition

  • Rod Ellis (a1)
Abstract

This article takes a critical look at grammaticality judgment tasks in second language acquisition research. It begins by examining the theoretical assumptions that underlie grammaticality judgment tasks, pointing out that previous studies have reported considerable differences between the results obtained from grammaticality judgment tasks and from other, production-oriented tasks. A description of the design features of grammaticality judgment tasks that have been used to date is then provided. There follows an account of a small-scale study designed to investigate the nature of learner judgments. Twenty-one adult advanced Chinese learners of English were asked to judge sentences designed to test their knowledge of dative alternation. The results indicated that the learners rarely used the “not sure” option in the test. Eight of these subjects were then administered a reduced version of the original test as a think-aloud task 1 week later. The results showed that these learners were inconsistent in 22.5% of their judgments. The think-aloud protocols showed that they resorted to a variety of strategies in making judgments. The article concludes by arguing that grammaticality judgment tasks elicit a particular kind of performance that needs to be understood much more thoroughly before it is used as a basis for investigating second language acquisition.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arthur B. (1980). Gauging the boundaries of second language competence: A study of learner judgements. Language Learning, 30, 177194.
Bialystok E. (1979). Explicit and implicit judgements of L2 grammatically. Language Learning, 29, 81103.
Bley-Vroman R., Felix S., & loup G. (1988). The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, 4, 132.
Burt M., Dulay H., & Hernandez E. (1973). Bilingual syntax measure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Carroll J., Bever T., & Pollack C. (1981). The non uniqueness of linguistic intuitions. Language, 57, 368382.
Chaudron C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgements: A review of theory, methods and results. Language Learning, 33, 343377.
Cohen A. (1987). Using verbal reports in research on language learning. In Faerch C. & Kasper G. (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 8295). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual matters.
Cook V. (forthcoming). The head parameter in 12 learning.
Ellis R., & Rathbone M. (1987). The acquisition of German in a classroom context. Mimeograph, London: Ealing College of Higher Education, London.
Gass S. (1983). The development of L2 intuitions. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 273291.
Gass S. (1984). The empirical basis for the Universal Hypothesis in interlanguage. In Davies A., Criper C., & Howatt T. (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 321). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Giles H., & Powesland P. (1975). Speech styles and evaluation. London: Academic.
Hawkins R. (1987). Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 3, 2055.
Hulstijn J. H. (1984). Difficulties in the acquisition of two word order rules by adult learners of Dutch. In Anderson R. (Ed.), Second languages: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 6173). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Kellerman E. (1985). Dative alternation and the analysis of data: A reply to Mazurkewich. Language Learning, 55, 91101.
Kellerman E. (1986). An eye fr an eye: Crosslinguistic constraints on the development of the L2 lexicon. In Kellerman E. & Sharwood Smith M. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition (pp. 3548). Oxford: Pergamon.
Liceras M. J. (1983). Markedness, contrastive analysis and the acquisition of Spanish syntax by English speakers. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Toronto.
Mazurkewich I. (1984a). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language Learning, 34, 91109.
Mazurkewich I. (1984b). Dative questions and markedness. In Eckman F., Bell L., & Nelson D., (Eds.), Universals of second language acquisition (pp. 119131). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Mazurkewich I. (1985). Syntactic markedness and language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 1536.
Naiman N. (1974). The use of elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 2, 137.
Schachter J. (1974). An error in error analysis, language Learning, 24, 205214.
Schachter J. (1989). A new look at an old classic. Second Language Research, 5, 3042.
Sharwood Smith M. (1988). Modularity in second language research. Polyglot, 9, (Fiche 2, Dl).
Skehan P. (1989). Language testing Part II. Language Teaching, 22, 113.
Tanaka S. (1987). The selective use of specific exemplars in second language performance: The case of dative alternation. Language Learning, 37, 6388.
Tarone E., & Parrish B. (1985). Task-related variation in interlanguage: The case of articles. Paper presented at the Annual TESOL Conference, Anaheim, CA.
White L. (1985). The ‘pro-drop’ parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 35, 4762.
White L. (1987). Argument structure in second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Conference on Interlanguage, La Trobe University, Melbourne.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 80 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 567 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.