Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

HOW DO SECOND LANGUAGE LISTENERS PERCEIVE THE COMPREHENSIBILITY OF FOREIGN-ACCENTED SPEECH?: ROLES OF FIRST LANGUAGE PROFILES, SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY, AGE, EXPERIENCE, FAMILIARITY, AND METACOGNITION

  • Kazuya Saito (a1), Mai Tran (a2), Yui Suzukida (a3), Hui Sun (a4), Viktoria Magne (a5) and Meltem Ilkan (a6)...

Abstract

The current study examines how second language (L2) users differentially assess the comprehensibility (i.e., ease of understanding) of foreign-accented speech according to a range of background variables, including first language (L1) profiles, L2 proficiency, age, experience, familiarity, and metacognition. A total of 110 L2 listeners first evaluated the global comprehensibility of 50 spontaneous speech samples produced by low-, mid-, and high-proficiency Japanese speakers of English. The listeners were categorized into two subgroups according to a cluster analysis of their rating scores: lenient and strict. Results showed that while the lenient listeners appeared to rely equally on many linguistic areas of speech during their judgments, the strict listeners were strongly attuned to phonological accuracy. Analysis of the background questionnaire data revealed that more lenient listeners likely had higher levels of awareness of the importance of comprehensibility for communication (metacognition); regularly used L2 English in professional settings (experience); and had L1s more linguistically close to the target speech samples, Japanese-accented English (L1-L2 distance).

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to Kazuya Saito, University College London, Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, United Kingdom WC1H 0AL. E-mail: k.saito@ucl.ac.uk

Footnotes

Hide All

We are grateful to two anonymous SSLA reviewers and the journal editor, Luke Plonsky, for their constructive feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript. This study was funded by Birkbeck Additional Research Grant.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of acquisition and nativelikeness in a second language—Listener perception vs. linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249306.
Appel, R., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., Isaacs, T., & Webb, S. (2019). Lexical aspects of comprehensibility and nativeness from the perspective of native-speaking English raters. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 170(1), 2452.
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2006). Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 231250.
Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. (2003). The interlanguage intelligibility benefit. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 114, 16001610.
Boersma, D., & Weenink, P. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer version 6.0.29. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org.
Bradlow, A., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106, 707729.
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Linguistic dimensions of second language accent and comprehensibility: Nonnative listeners’ perspectives. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2, 160182.
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K. (2015). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? Modern Language Journal, 99, 8095.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Rossiter, M. J. (2002). Teaching native speakers to listen to foreign-accented speech. Journal of Multilingualism and Multicultural Development, 23, 245259.
Eger, N. A., & Reinisch, E. (2019). The role of acoustic cues and listener proficiency in the perception of accent in nonnative sounds. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 179200.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906.
Flege, J. (2016). The role of phonetic category formation in second language speech acquisition. Plenary address delivered at New Sounds, Aarhus, Denmark.
Foote, J. A., & Trofimovich, P. (2018). Is it because of my language background? A study of language background influence on comprehensibility judgments. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74, 253278.
Freed, B. F., Dewey, D. P., Segalowitz, N., & Halter, R. (2004). The language contact profile. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 349356.
Gordon, J., & Darcy, I. (2016). The development of comprehensible speech in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2, 5692.
Harding, L. (2012). Accent, listening assessment and the potential for a shared-L1 advantage: A DIF perspective. Language Testing, 29, 163180.
Hayes-Harb, R., Smith, B. L., Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2008). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 664679.
Isaacs, T., Trofimovich, P., & Foote, J. A. (2018). Developing a user-oriented second language comprehensibility scale for English-medium universities. Language Testing, 35, 193216.
Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of English language learner proficiency in oral English, Modern Language Journal, 94, 554566.
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 459489.
Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leow, R. P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557584.
Loewen, S., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis. In Plonsky, L. (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 182–212). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ludwig, A., & Mora, J. C. (2017). Processing time and comprehensibility judgments in non-native listeners’ perception of L2 speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3, 167198.
Marsden, E., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. (2016). The IRIS Repository: Advancing research practice and methodology. In Mackey, A. & Marsden, E. (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages (pp. 1–21). New York: Routledge.
Munro, M., & Derwing, T. (2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34, 520531.
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 111131.
Nagle, C. (2018). Motivation, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish: Investigating motivation as a time-varying predictor of pronunciation development. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 199217.
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204238.
Ortega, L. (2018). SLA in uncertain times: Disciplinary constraints, transdisciplinary hopes. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 33, 130.
Pennycook, A. (2017). The cultural politics of English as an international language. London: Routledge.
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Souza, P. E. (2003). Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 1116.
Plonsky, L., & Ghanbar, H. (2018). Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and guide to interpreting R2 values. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 713731.
Ranta, L., & Meckelborg, A. (2013). How much exposure to English do international graduate students really get? Measuring language use in a naturalistic setting. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 133.
Saito, K. (2015). Experience effects on the development of late second language learners’ oral proficiency. Language Learning, 65, 563595.
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (in press). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning. doi:10.1111/lang.12345
Saito, K., & Shintani, N. (2016). Do native speakers of North American and Singapore English differentially perceive second language comprehensibility? TESOL Quarterly, 50, 421446.
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 217240.
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2017). Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38, 439462.
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Webb, S. (2016). Re-examining phonological and lexical correlates of second Language comprehensibility: The role of rater experience. In Isaacs, T. & Trofimovich, P. (Eds.), Interfaces in second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 141156). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Saito, K., Webb, S., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Lexical profiles of comprehensible second language speech: The role of appropriateness, fluency, variation, sophistication, abstractness and sense relations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 677701.
Saito, Y., & Saito, K. (2017). Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 21, 589608.
Shibatani, M. (1990). The languages of Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 33063316.
Suzukida, Y., & Saito, K. (in press). Which segmental features matter for successful L2 comprehensibility? Revisiting and generalizing the pedagogical value of the functional load principle. Language Teaching Research.
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Myford, C. (2013). Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing, 30, 231252.
Witteman, M. J., Weber, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2013). Foreign accent strength and listener familiarity with an accent codetermine speed of perceptual adaptation. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 75, 537556.
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Saito et al. supplementary material
Saito et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (89 KB)
89 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed