Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T23:21:31.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INCOMPLETE ACQUISITION FROM A USAGE-BASED PERSPECTIVE

A RESPONSE TO DOMÍNGUEZ, HICKS, AND SLABAKOVA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2019

Eve Zyzik
Eve Zyzik*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Eve Zyzik, Humanities Academic Services, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064. E-mail: ezyzik@ucsc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Critical Commentary
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 279 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Blake, R. (1983). Mood selection among Spanish-speaking children, ages 4 to 12. Bilingual Review/La Revista Bilingüe, 10, 21–32.Google Scholar
Domínguez, L., Hicks, G., & Slabakova, R. (2019). Terminology choice in generative acquisition research: The case of “incomplete acquisition” in heritage language grammars. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41, 241–255. doi: 10.1017/S0272263119000160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, C., & Barbosa, P. (2014). When reduced input leads to delayed acquisition: A study on the acquisition of clitic placement by Portuguese heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 304–325. doi: 10.1177/1367006912448124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, C., Santos, A., Jesus, A., & Marques, R. (2017). Age and input effects in the acquisition of mood in Heritage Portuguese. Journal of Child Language, 44, 795–828. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, V. M. (2007). Miami and North Wales, so far and yet so near: A constructivist account of morphosyntactic development in bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 224–247. doi: 10.2167/beb442.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2019). An individual‐differences framework for comparing nonnative with native speakers: Perspectives from BLC theory. Language Learning, 69, 157–183. doi: 10.1111/lang.12317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., & Geeslin, K. (2014). The interpretation of Spanish subjunctive and indicative forms in adverbial clauses: A cross-sectional study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 487–533. doi: 10.1017/S0272263114000126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2018). Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22, 564–582. doi: 10.1177/1367006916654355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. (2016). Usage-based approaches to language development: Where do we go from here? Language and Cognition, 8, 346–368. doi: 10.1017/langcog.2016.16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Sánchez-Walker, N. (2013). Differential object marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 20, 109–132. doi: 10.1080/10489223.2013.766741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2018). Bilingual children and adult heritage speakers: The range of comparison. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22, 547–563. doi: 10.1177/1367006916656048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2013). First language attrition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 94–115. doi: 10.1075/lab.3.1.05sch.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, N. L. (2018). Child heritage speakers’ morphosyntax: Rate of acquisition and crosslinguistic influence. In Potowski, K. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of Spanish as a heritage language (pp. 235–253). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315735139-16.Google Scholar
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018). Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In. Miller, D., Bayram, F., Rothman, J., & Serratrice, L., Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp. 37–56). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.54.03wul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyzik, E. (2019). Creativity and conventionality in heritage language bilingualism. Language Learning. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/lang.12349.Google Scholar
Zyzik, E., & Sanchez, R. A. (2019). Beyond accuracy: Heritage speakers’ performance on two kinds of acceptability judgment tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40, 645–671. doi: 10.1017/S0142716418000760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar