Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:09:11.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Instruction and the Development of Questions in L2 Classrooms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Nina Spada  and
Patsy M. Lightbown
Nina Spada
Affiliation:
McGill University
Patsy M. Lightbown
Affiliation:
Concordia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is a report on a quasi-experimental study designed to investigate contributions of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback to the development of interrogative constructions in the oral performance of English-as-a-second-language (ESL) learners. The subjects were young francophone learners of English (age 10–12) receiving intensive ESL instruction. Their accuracy and developmental progress in the use of interrogative structures was measured prior to a 2-week period of instructional treatment. Immediate and delayed posttests were administered after the instruction. The language produced by the instructors while teaching interrogative structures was examined in relation to the learners' oral performance. Similar analyses were carried out with a comparison group. The results support the hypothesis that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative interaction can contribute positively to second language development in both the short and long term.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 205 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brindley, G. (1991, April). Learnability in the ESL classroom:A pilot study. Paper presented at the Regional English Language Centre's Regional Seminar on Language Acquisition in the Second/Foreign Language Classroom, Singapore.Google Scholar
Day, E., & Shapson, S. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches in language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 41, 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies In Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1984). Can syntax be taught? A study of the effects of formal instruction on the acquisition of WH questions by children. Applied Linguistics, 5, 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerly, H. (1987). The immersion approach: Litmus test of second-language acquisition through class room communication. Modern Language Journal, 71, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar to French immersion:A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, T. V., & Clifford, R. (1982). The push toward communication. In Higgs, T. V.(Ed.), Curriculum, competence, and the foreign language teacher (pp. 57–79). Skokie, IL: National Textbook.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M.(1983a). Acquiring English L2 in Quebec classrooms. In Felix, S. & Wode, H.(Eds.), Language development at the crossroads (pp. 101–120) Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M.(1983b). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In Seliger, H. W. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 217–243). Rowley, MA: Newbury.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (1985). Input and acquisition for second language learners in and out of classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 6, 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (1987). Classroom language as input to second language acquisition. In Pfaff, C.(Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 169–187). Cambridge, MA: Newbury.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1978). Performance on an oral communication task francophone ESL learners. SPEAQ Journal, 2 (4), 35–54.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus on form and corrective feedback In communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983). Does instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development In Beebe, L. (Ed), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115–141). New York: Newbury.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Coste, D., Ginsberg, R., & Kramsch, C. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In Hyltenstam, K. & Pienemann, M. (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 23–75) Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1988). Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. AILA Review, 40–72.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1986). An acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 92–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 217–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, W. E. (1987). Second language grammar: Learning and teaching, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1986). The epistemological status of second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 2, 120–159.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. (1990). A look at the research process in classroom observation: A case study. In Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (Eds.), ELT documents: Special issue on classroom centred research. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1989). Intensive ESL programs in Quebec primary schools. TESL Canada Journal 7(1) 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1988). Down the garden path: Inducing and correcting overgeneralization errors in the foreign language classroom. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1988). How juries get hung: Problems with the evidence for a focus on form in teaching. Language Learning, 38, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1990). Implications of learnability theories for second language learning and teaching. In Halliday, M. A. K., Gibbons, J., & Nicholas, H. (Eds.), Learning, keeping and using language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133–161.Google Scholar
White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar