Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 45
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    Ahmadpour Kasgari, Zahra 2018. Elaborative text modification vs. input flooding: a case study on non-congruent collocations. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, Vol. 3, Issue. 1,
    Wong, Wynne 2018. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. p. 1.
    Malone, Jonathan 2018. INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY LEARNING IN SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, p. 1.
    LaBrozzi, Ryan M 2016. The effects of textual enhancement type on L2 form recognition and reading comprehension in Spanish. Language Teaching Research, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 75.
    Gilabert, Roger Manchón, Rosa and Vasylets, Olena 2016. Mode in Theoretical and Empirical TBLT Research: Advancing Research Agendas. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 36, Issue. , p. 117.
    Narang, Vaishna Priya, Salonee and Chaudhry, Varalakshmi 2016. Second Language Acquisition in Multilingual and Mixed Ability Indian Classrooms. p. 23.
    SHARDAKOVA, MARIA 2016. American Learners’ Comprehension of Russian Textual Humor. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 100, Issue. 2, p. 466.
    Leow, Ronald P. 2015. Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. Vol. 48, Issue. , p. 47.
    Palma, Gildardo 2014. A Classroom View of Negotiation of Meaning With EFL Adult Mexican Pupils. SAGE Open, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 215824401453594.
    Uggen, Maren S. 2012. Reinvestigating the Noticing Function of Output. Language Learning, Vol. 62, Issue. 2, p. 506.
    Sturm, Jessica L. 2012. Meaning and orthography in L2 French. Writing Systems Research, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 47.
    Hu, Guangwei 2011. Metalinguistic knowledge, metalanguage, and their relationship in L2 learners. System, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. 63.
    Loewen, Shawn and Reinders, Hayo 2011. Key Concepts in Second Language Acquisition. p. 1.
    Mystkowska-Wiertelak, Anna 2011. The Effects of a Combined Output and Input-Oriented Approach in Teaching Reported Speech. Research in Language, Vol. 9, Issue. 2,
    Truscott, John and Smith, Michael Sharwood 2011. INPUT, INTAKE, AND CONSCIOUSNESS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 33, Issue. 04, p. 497.
    Simard, Daphnée 2008. Effet de la nature des éléments grammaticaux sur la saisie en français langue seconde. Canadian Modern Language Review, Vol. 64, Issue. 3, p. 491.
    Pulido, Diana 2007. The Relationship Between Text Comprehension and Second Language Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition: A Matter of Topic Familiarity?. Language Learning, Vol. 57, Issue. , p. 155.
    Marsden, Emma 2006. Exploring Input Processing in the Classroom: An Experimental Comparison of Processing Instruction and Enriched Input. Language Learning, Vol. 56, Issue. 3, p. 507.
    CLAHSEN, HARALD and FELSER, CLAUDIA 2006. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 27, Issue. 01, p. 3.
    Papadopoulou, Despina 2005. Reading-time studies of second language ambiguity resolution. Second Language Research, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 98.
    Download full list
    ×
  • Get access
    Add to cart USD25.00
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register Recommend to librarian

Intake: On Models and Methods for Discovering Learners' Processing of Input

  • Craig Chaudron (a1)
Abstract

Models of the second language acquisition process have not specifically elaborated on the nature of the learner's perception and processing of target language input, a process known as intake. They have typically failed to specify the mechanisms or variables involved in the intake process or to distinguish between the stages of processing input from perception, to comprehension, to assimilation into an interlanguage grammar. Research and theoretical models from L1 psycholinguistic literature have been neglected. Recent L1 and L2 research on language processing are compared, and experimental methods for eliciting data to confirm them are discussed.

Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © Cambridge University Press 1985
References
Hide All
Ammon, M. S., & Slobin, D. I.. 1979. A cross-linguistic study of the processing of causative sentences. Cognition 7; 3–17.
Bialystok, E. 1978. A theoretical model of second language learning. Language Learning 28; 69–83.
Bialystok, E. 1982. On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms. Applied Linguistics III; 181–206.
Chaudron, C. 1983a. Simplification of input: Topic reinstatements and their effects on L2 learners' recognition and recall. TESOL Quarterly 17; 437–58.
Chaudron, C. 1983b. Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning 33; 343–77.
Chaudron, C. In press. A method for examining the input/intake distinction. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (eds.), Input and second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Cole, R. A. (ed.). 1980. Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cole, R. A., & Jakimik, J.. 1980. A model of speech perception. In R. A. Cole (ed.), pp. 133–63.
Corder, S. P. 1967. The significance of learners' errors. IRAL 5; 161–70.
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G.. 1980. Processes and strategies in foreign language learning and communication. The Interlanguage Studies Bulletin—Utrecht 5(1); 47–118.
Gass, S. 1979. Sentence processing by L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2(2); 85–98.
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (eds.). 1983. Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Gasser, M. 1983. Towards a computer model of second language listening comprehension. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, November 13.
Glanzer, M. 1982. Short-term memory. In Puff, C. R. (ed.). Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition, pp. 63–98. New York: Academic Press.
Harris, D. P. 1969. Report on an experimental group-administered memory span test. TESOL Quarterly 4; 203–13.
Hatch, E. 1974. Second language learning-universals? Wording Papers on Bilingualism 3; 1–17.
Henning, G., Gary, N., & Gary, J. O.. 1981. Listening recall—a listening comprehension test for low proficiency learners. Paper presented at the AILA Congress, Lund, August 9.
Henrichsen, L. E. 1984. Sandhi-variation: A filter of input for learners of ESL. Language Learning 34; 103–126.
Hulstijn, J., & Hulstijn, W.. 1984. Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning 34; 23–43.
Hyltenstam, K. 1983. Data types and second language variability. In H. Ringbom (ed.), pp. 57–74.
Ioup, G. 1984. Testing the relationship of formal instruction to the input hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly 18; 345–350.
Jarvella, R. J. 1971. Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10; 409–416.
Jarvella, R. J., & Herman, S. J.. 1972. Clause structure of sentences and speech processing. Perception and Psychophysics 11; 381–384.
Johansson, S. 1973. Partial dictation as a test of foreign language proficiency. Swedish-English contrastive studies, Report No. 3. Department of English, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jusczyk, P. W. 1981. Infant speech perception: A critical appraisal. In Eimas, P. D. & Miller, J. L. (eds. ), Perspectives on the study of speech, pp. 113–64. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Krashen, S. D. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Pergamon.
Krashen, S. D. 1983. Newmark's ‘ignorance hypothesis’ and current second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (eds.), pp. 135–53.
Krashen, S. D. 1984. Response to Ioup. TESOL Quarterly 18; 350–52.
Larsen-Freeman, D. E. 1976. ESL teacher speech as input to the ESL learner. Workpapers in Teaching English as a Second Language 10; 45–49. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles.
Lehtonen, J., & Sajavaara, K.. 1983. Acceptability and ambiguity in native and second language message processing. In H. Ringbom (ed.), pp. 101–125.
Long, M. H. 1981. Questions in foreigner talk discourse. Language Learning 31; 135–57.
Markman, B. R., Spilka, I. V., & Tucker, G. R.. 1975. The use of elicited imitation in search of an interim French grammar. Language Learning 25; 31–41.
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K.. 1980. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8; 1–71.
Massaro, D. W. (ed.). 1975. Understanding language: An information-processing analysis of speech perception, reading, and psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B.. 1983. Second-language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning 33; 135–58.
Meara, P.. 1980. Syntactic structure and memory span in second language learners. The Interlanguage Studies Bulletin—Utrecht 5 (2; 31–54.
Naiman, N.. 1974. The use of elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Wording Papers on Bilingualism 2; (1–37.
Nelson, T. O.. 1977. Repetition and depth of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16; (151–171.
Ringbom, H.. (ed.) 1983. Psycholinguistics and foreign language learning. Åbo Finland; (Åbo Akademi.
Sajavaara, K.. 1981. Psycholinguistic models, second language acquisition, and contrastive analysis. In Fisiak, J. (ed.), Contrastive linguistics and the language teacher pp.87–120Oxford; (Pergamon.
Schachter, J.. 1983a. Nutritional needs of language learners. In Clarke, M. A. & Handscombe, J. (eds.), On TESOL ‛82: Pacific perspectives on language learning and teaching pp. 175–89 Washington; (D.C.: TESOL.
Schachter, J.. 1983b. A new account of language transfer. In Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (eds.), pp. 98–111.
Selinker, L. & Lamendella, J. T.. 1981. Updating the interlanguage hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3(2); (201–20.
Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider, W.. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information-processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 83; (127–90.
Slobin, D. I. 1973a. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. I. (eds.), Studies in child language development, pp. 175–208New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Slobin, D. I. & Bever, T. G.. 1982 Children use canonical sentence schemas: A cross-linguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12; 229–65.
Spitze, K., & Fischer, S. 1981 Short-term memory as a test of language proficiency. TESL Talk, 12(4); 32–41.
Swain, M., Durnas, G. & Naiman, N.. 1974 Alternatives to spontaneous speech: Elicited translation and imitation as indicators of second language competence. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 3; 68–79.
Tarone, E. 1984 Variability in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Paper presented at the eighteenth annual TESOL convention. Houston, (03 6–11.
Tommola, J. 1979 Testing listening comprehension through redundancy reduction. In Lautamatti, L. & Lindqvist, P. (eds.), Focus on spoken English, pp. 77–97. Jyvaskyla, Finland: Language Centre for Finnish Universities, University of Jyvaskyla.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 168 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 840 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Cancel
Confirm
×