Skip to main content
×
×
Home

LEARNING DIRECTION MATTERS: A STUDY ON L2 RHYTHM ACQUISITION BY DUTCH LEARNERS OF SPANISH AND SPANISH LEARNERS OF DUTCH

  • Lieke van Maastricht (a1), Emiel Krahmer (a2), Marc Swerts (a2) and Pilar Prieto (a3)
Abstract

This study examines the acquisition process of speech rhythm in Dutch learners of Spanish (DLS) and Spanish learners of Dutch (SLD) at different proficiency levels to determine whether learning direction affects the success of rhythm acquisition in a foreign language (L2). Analyses of lengthening effects showed that the two learner groups followed different developmental paths in their acquisition of accentual and final lengthening: Both groups showed transfer effects from the L1, but while the DLS systematically approached their target until attainment, the SLD showed more variability in their development. In addition, syllable structure complexity affected L2 rhythm acquisition, and to a substantially larger extent for the SLD compared to the DLS. The results support a model of L2 rhythm acquisition in which learning direction is included as a factor, and that allows for the interaction of various language-specific properties that contribute to speech rhythm, like syllable structure complexity.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lieke van Maastricht, Radboud University, Postbus 9102, 6500 HC Nijmegen, Netherlands. E-mail: l.vanmaastricht@let.ru.nl
Footnotes
Hide All

This research was made possible through grants from the Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds (40005750/HEV/ILE), the Jo Kolk fund, the Grup de Recerca Consolidat 2017 (SGR _ 971) and Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (FFI2015-6653). We thank Gerdientje Oggel, Johanna Sattler, Arthur Verbiest, and Astrid van Winden for their help during data collection. We gratefully acknowledge Joan Borràs-Comes, Elena Kireva, Mart Lubbers, and Paolo Mairano for their help with data analyses, and Núria Esteve-Gibert and Constantijn Kaland for coding part of the data to test coding reliability. Finally, thanks are due to three anonymous reviewers for their helpful input and feedback on the content of this manuscript. Any errors that remain are our own.

Preliminary versions of the first two studies of this paper were presented at the Speech Prosody conference in May 2016 in Boston and at the New Sounds conference in June 2016 in Aarhus, Denmark, respectively. The current paper includes a more detailed theoretical background and description of the experimental methods, more extensive discussions of the results, and more advanced statistical analyses over the complete dataset.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Allen, G. D., & Hawkins, S. (1978). The development of phonological rhythm. In Bell, A. & Hooper, J. (Eds.), Syllables and segments (pp. 172185). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing.
Archibald, J. (1994). A formal model of learning L2 prosodic phonology. Second Language Research, 10, 215240.
Arvaniti, A. (2009). Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm. Phonetica, 66, 4663.
Arvaniti, A. (2012). The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 351373.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255278.
Beckman, M., & Edwards, J. (1994). Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories, phonological structure and phonetic form. In Keating, P. A. (Ed.), Papers in laboratory phonology III (pp. 733). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct-realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 171204). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.04) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.
Bolinger, D. L. (1965). Pitch accent and sentence rhythm. In Abe, I. & Kanekiyo, T. (Eds.), Forms of English: Accent, morpheme, order (pp. 139180). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Booij, G. (1995). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Bunta, F., & Ingram, D. (2007). The acquisition of speech rhythm by bilingual Spanish- and English-speaking 4- and 5-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 9991014.
Byrd, D. (2000). Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica, 57, 316.
Cambier-Langeveld, T., & Turk, A. E. (1999). A cross-linguistic study of accentual lengthening: Dutch vs. English. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 255280.
Cambier-Langeveld, T., Nespor, M., & van Heuven, V. J. (1997). The domain of final lengthening in production and perception in Dutch. Proceeding of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, 2, 931934.
Carter, P. M. (2005). Quantifying rhythmic differences between Spanish, English, and Hispanic English. In Gess, R. S. & Rudin, E. (Eds.), Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 34th linguistic symposium on romance languages, Salt Lake City, March 2004 (pp. 6375). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalysed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 5162.
Dauer, R. M. (1987). Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 447450). Tallinn, Estonia: Academy of Sciences.
Delattre, P. (1966). A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 4, 183198.
Delattre, P. (1969). An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics for Language Teaching, 7, 295325.
Eckman, F. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning 27, 315330.
Eckman, F. (2008). Typological markedness and second language phonology. In Hansen Edwards, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 95115). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551585.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 7, 515546.
Grabe, E., Watson, I., & Post, B. (1999). The acquisition of rhythmic patterns in English and French. In Ohala, J. J., Hasegawa, Y., Ohala, M., Granville, D., & Bailey, A. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 12011204). San Francisco, CA: University of California.
Gut, U. (2009). Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The addition bias in Dutch and Spanish phonological speech errors: The role of structural context. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 6196.
Hualde, J. I. (2005). The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Koopmans-Van Beinum, F. J. (1980). Vowel contrast reduction: An acoustic and perceptual study of Dutch vowels in various speech conditions. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academische Pers.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159174.
Levelt, C., & Van de Vijver, R. (2004). Syllable types in cross-linguistic and developmental grammars. In Kager, R., Pater, J., & Zonneveld, W. (Eds.), Fixing priorities: Constraints in phonological acquisition (pp. 204218). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Li, A., & Post, B. (2014). L2 acquisition of prosodic properties of speech rhythm. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 223255.
Lubbers, M., & Torreira, F. (2015). Praatalign: An interactive Praat plug-in for performing phonetic forced alignment (version 1.9b) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://github.com/dopefishh/praatalign.
Mennen, I. (2004). Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 543563.
Navarro Tomás, T. (1966). Estudios de fonologia española [Studies on Spanish phonology]. New York, NY: Las Américas.
Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 756766.
Ordin, M., & Polyanskaya, L. (2014). Development of timing patterns in first and second languages. System, 42, 244257.
Ordin, M., & Polyanskaya, L. (2015). Acquisition of speech rhythm in a second language by learners with rhythmically different native languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138, 533544.
Özçelik, Ö. (2016). The Prosodic Acquisition Path Hypothesis: Towards explaining variability in L2 acquisition of phonology. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1, 148.
Payne, E., Post, B., Prieto, P., Vanrell, M., & Astruc, L. (2012). Measuring child rhythm. Language and Speech, 55, 203229.
Peterson, G. E., & Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 693703.
Pike, K. L. (1945). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Polyanskaya, L., & Ordin, M. (2015). Acquisition of speech rhythm in first language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138, 199204.
Polyanskaya, L., Ordin, M., & Busà, M. (2017). Relative salience of speech rhythm and speech rate on perceived foreign accent in a second language. Language and Speech, 60, 333355.
Post, B., & Payne, E. (2018). Speech rhythm in development: What is the child acquiring? In Prieto, P. & Esteve-Gibert, N. (Eds.), The development of prosody in first language acquisition (pp. 126143). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Prieto, P., Vanrell, M., Astruc, L., Payne, E., & Post, B. (2012). Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm: Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish. Speech Communication, 54, 681702.
Ramus, F., & Mehler, J. (1999). Language identification with suprasegmental cues: A study based on speech resynthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 512521.
Ramus, F., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (2003). The psychological reality of rhythm classes: Perceptual studies. In Solé, M., Recasens, D., & Romero, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 337342). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autonomá de Barcelona.
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265292.
Rasier, L. (2006). Prosodie en vreemdetaalverwerving: accentdistributie in het Frans en in het Nederlands als vreemde taal [Prosody and second language acquisition: Accent distribution in French and Dutch as a foreign language] (Doctoral dissertation). Louvain, Belgium: Université catholique de Louvain.
Schiller, N. O., Meyer, A. S., Baayen, R. H., & Levelt, W. J. (1996). A comparison of lexeme and speech syllables in Dutch. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 3, 828.
Schmidt, E., & Post, B. (2015). The development of prosodic features and their contribution to rhythm production in simultaneous bilinguals. Language and Speech, 58, 2447.
Ten Bosch, L. F. M. (1991). On the structure of vowel systems: Aspects of an extended vowel model using effort and contrast [Doctoral dissertation]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Van Maastricht, L., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2016). Prominence patterns in a second language: Intonational transfer from Dutch to Spanish and vice versa. Language Learning, 66(1), 124158.
Van Zon, M. (1997). Speech processing in Dutch: A cross-linguistic approach [Doctoral dissertation]. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.
White, L., & Mattys, S. L. (2007a). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 501522.
White, L., & Mattys, S. L. (2007b). Rhythmic typology and variation in first and second languages. In Prieto, P., Mascaró, J., & Solé, M.-J. (Eds.), Segmental and prosodic issues in Romance phonology: Current issues in linguistic theory series (pp. 237257). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Wiget, L., White, L., Schuppler, B., Grenon, I., Rauch, O., & Mattys, S. (2010). How stable are acoustic metrics of contrastive speech rhythm? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 15591569.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

van Maastricht et al. supplementary material
Appendices A-B

 Word (84 KB)
84 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed