Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:49:45.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE LEMMA DILEMMA

HOW SHOULD WORDS BE OPERATIONALIZED IN RESEARCH AND PEDAGOGY?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2021

Stuart Webb Open the ORCID record for Stuart Webb [Opens in a new window]
Stuart Webb*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: swebb27@uwo.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recently there has been some debate about the appropriacy of different lexical units in pedagogy and research (e.g., Brown et al., 2020; Dang & Webb, 2016a; Kremmel, 2016; Laufer & Cobb, 2020; McLean, 2018; Nation, 2016; Nation & Webb, 2011; Vilkaitė-Lozdienė & Schmitt, 2020). The lexical unit (word types, lemmas, flemmas, word families) needs to be considered when developing wordlists, vocabulary tests, and vocabulary learning programs. It is also central to the lexical profiles of text and corpora, which indicate the vocabulary learning targets associated with understanding different types of discourse. Perhaps most importantly, the lexical unit of words found in vocabulary learning resources such as word lists and tests may affect their pedagogical value. The aim of this article is to highlight aspects of research and pedagogy that are affected by lexical units and describe issues that should be considered when operationalizing words in studies of vocabulary and learning resources.

Information

Type
Critical Commentary
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 43 , Issue 5 , December 2021 , pp. 941 - 949
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bauer, L., & Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6, 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, R., Laine, M., & Virkkala, M. M. (2000). The role of derivational morphology in vocabulary acquisition: Get by with a little help from my morpheme friends. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brezina, V., & Gablasova, D. (2015). Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list. Applied Linguistics, 36, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (2018). Examining the word family through word lists. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 7, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D., Stoeckel, T., Mclean, S., & Stewart, J. (2020). The most appropriate lexical unit for L2 vocabulary research and pedagogy: A brief review of the evidence. Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A., Nation, P., & Sim, D. (2015). Measuring the vocabulary size of native speakers of English in New Zealand secondary schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 50, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2017). The Academic Spoken Word List. Language Learning, 67, 959–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2014). The lexical profile of academic spoken English. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2016a). Evaluating lists of high frequency vocabulary. ITL–International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167, 132–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2016b). Making an essential word list for beginners. In Nation, I. S. P., Making and using word lists for language learning and testing (pp. 153–167, 188–195). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. (2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/Google Scholar
Durbahn, M., Rodgers, M., & Peters, E. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary and viewing comprehension. System, 88, 102166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35, 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13, 403–430.Google Scholar
Iwaizumi, E., & Webb, S. (2021). Measuring L1 and L2 productive derivational knowledge: How many derivatives can L1 and L2 learners with differing vocabulary levels produce? TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremmel, B. (2016). Word families and frequency bands in vocabulary tests: Challenging conventions, TESOL Quarterly, 50, 976–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text lexis is essential for comprehension? In Lauren, C. & Nordman, M. (Eds.), Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines (pp 316–323). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Cobb, T. (2020). How much knowledge of derived words is needed for reading? Applied Linguistics, 41, 971–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, S. (2018). Evidence for the adoption of the flemma as an appropriate word counting unit. Applied Linguistics, 39, 823–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W., Anderson, R. C., Schommer, M., Scott, J. A., & Stallman, A. C. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5, 12–25.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nationGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2016). Making and using word lists for language learning and testing. John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31, 9–13.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Heinle.Google Scholar
Nurmukhamedov, U., & Webb, S. (2019). Research timeline: Lexical coverage and profiling. Language Teaching, 52, 188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 31–55.Google Scholar
Reynolds, B. L. (2013). Comments on Stuart Webb and John Macalister’s “Is text written for children useful for L2 extensive reading?” TESOL Quarterly, 47, 849–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, B. L. (2015). The effects of word form variation and frequency on second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Applied Linguistics Review, 6, 467–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, B. L., & Wible, D. (2014). Frequency in incidental vocabulary acquisition research: An undefined concept and some consequences. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, M. P. (2013). English language learning through viewing television: An investigation of comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, lexical coverage, attitudes, and captions. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 589–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly, 36, 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34, 457–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L., & Schmitt, N. (2020). Frequency as a guide for vocabulary usefulness: High-, mid-, and low-frequency words In Webb, S. (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp. 81–96). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ward, J., & Chuenjundaeng, J. (2009). Suffix knowledge: Acquisition and applications. System, 37, 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28, 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., & Macalister, J. (2013). Is text written for children appropriate for L2 extensive reading? TESOL Quarterly, 47, 300–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). The vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59, 335–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL–International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168, 34–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wysocki, K., & Jenkins, J. R. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar