Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

OBSERVING THE EMERGENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONAL KNOWLEDGE: VERB PATTERNS IN GERMAN AND SPANISH LEARNERS OF ENGLISH AT DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS

  • Ute Römer (a1) and Cynthia M. Berger (a2)

Abstract

Based on writing produced by second language learners at different proficiency levels (CEFR A1 to C1), we adopted a usage-based approach (Ellis, Römer, & O’Donnell, 2016; Tyler & Ortega, 2018) to investigate how German and Spanish learner knowledge of 19 English verb-argument constructions (VACs; e.g., “V with n,” illustrated by he always agrees with her) develops. We extracted VACs from subsets of the Education First-Cambridge Open Language Database, altogether comprising more than 68,000 texts and 6 million words. For each VAC, L1 learner group, and proficiency level, we determined type and token frequencies, as well as the most dominant verb-VAC associations. To study effects of proficiency and L1 on VAC production, we carried out correlation analyses to compare verb-VAC associations of learners at different levels and different L1 backgrounds. We also correlated each learner dataset with comparable data from a large reference corpus of native English usage. Results indicate that with increasing proficiency, learners expand their VAC repertoire and productivity, and verb-VAC associations move closer to native usage.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ute Römer, Department of Applied Linguistics and ESL, Georgia State University, 25 Park Place NE, Suite 1500, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. E-mail: uroemer@gsu.edu

Footnotes

Hide All

The authors would like to thank Georgia State University's Scholarly Support Grant Program for sponsoring the project “Language use, acquisition, and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of Construction Grammar”; Nick Ellis for his encouragement and support during the initial stages of the project; Matt O'Donnell and Stephen Skalicky for their help with data preparation for and data processing in R; and Luke Plonsky as well as two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier draft of this article.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Alexopoulou, T., Geertzen, J., Korhonen, A., & Meurers, D. (2015). Exploring big educational learner corpora for SLA research: Perspectives on relative clauses. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1, 96129.
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2015). A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. & O’Grady, W. (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 478510). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Anthony, L. (2014a). AntConc (Version 3.4.2) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.
Anthony, L. (2014b). TagAnt (Version 1.1.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (Eds.). (2000). Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Behrens, H. (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47, 383411.
Bestgen, Y., & Granger, S. (2014). Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 2841.
Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. (2011). Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language, 87, 5583.
Burnard, L. (2007). Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML edition). Retrieved from http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/docs/URG/.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossley, S., & Salsbury, T. L. (2011). The development of lexical bundle accuracy and production in English second language speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49, 126.
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). 560 million words, 1990–present. Retrieved from https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143188.
Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 63103). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009a). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 370385.
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009b). Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 188221.
Ellis, N. C., & Ogden, D. (2017). Thinking about multiword constructions: Usage-based approaches to acquisition and processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 604620.
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2013). Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning, 63, 2551.
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Language Learning Monograph Series. Malden, MA: Wiley.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2009). Constructing another language: Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 335357.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2012). L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62, 335372.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2014). What’s new? A usage-based classroom study of linguistic routines and creativity in L2 learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 52, 130.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2017). The emergence of creativity in L2 English: A usage-based case study. In Bell, N. (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on language play (pp. 281316). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2007). Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics. In Nenonen, M. & Niemi, S. (Eds.), Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the first Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes (Vol. 41) (pp. 8699). Joensuu, Finland: Joensuu University Press.
Eskildsen, S. W., Cadierno, T., & Li, P. (2015). On the development of motion constructions in four learners of L2 English. In Cadierno, T. & Eskildsen, S. W. (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 207232). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E. (1996). Grammar patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.
Garner, J. R. (2016). A phrase-frame approach to investigating phraseology in learner writing across proficiency levels. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 2, 3167.
Geertzen, J., Alexopoulou, T., & Korhonen, A. (2013). Automatic linguistic annotation of large scale L2 databases: The EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCAMDAT). Proceedings of the 31st Second Language Research Forum (SLRF). Pittsburgh, PA: Cascadilla Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 197212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219224.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2014). Patterns of experience in patterns of language. In Tomasello, M. (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (Vol. 1, pp. 187202). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289316.
Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182200.
Hawkins, J. A., & Buttery, P. (2010). Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal, 1, 123.
Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (2000). Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 311326.
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Li, P., Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2014). Tracing an L2 learner’s motion constructions over time: A usage-based classroom investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 612628.
Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24, 187219.
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2015). Variability and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language Learning, 65, 6388.
Meunier, F. (2015). Developmental patterns in learner corpora. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 379400). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Murakami, A. (2013). L1 Influence and individual variation in the L2 accuracy development of grammatical morphemes: Insights from learner corpora (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge.
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26, 619653.
Ninio, A. (2006). Language and the learning curve: A new theory of syntactic development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Nisioi, S. (2015). Feature analysis for native language identification. In Gelbukh, A. (Ed.), Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing: CICLing 2015. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Ortega, L. (2012). Interlanguage complexity: A construct in search of theoretical renewal. In Szmrecsanyi, B. & Kortmann, B. (Eds.), Linguistic complexity in interlanguage varieties, L2 varieties, and contact languages (pp. 127155). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H. (2008). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities: An introduction. In Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H. (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 320). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 2645.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191227). London, UK: Longman.
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language, 37, 607642.
R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Roehr-Brackin, K. (2014). Explicit knowledge and processes from a usage-based perspective: The developmental trajectory of an instructed L2 learner. Language Learning, 64, 771808.
Römer, U., & Garner, J. R. (in press). The development of verb constructions in spoken learner English: Tracing effects of usage and proficiency. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research.
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2014). Second language learner knowledge of verb-argument constructions: Effects of language transfer and typology. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 952975.
Römer, U., Skalicky, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018). Verb-argument constructions in advanced L2 English learner production: Insights from corpora and verbal fluency tasks. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0055.
Römer, U., Roberson, A., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2014). Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners’ knowledge of verb-argument constructions. ICAME Journal, 38, 5979.
Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 122). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tode, T., & Sakai, H. (2016). Exemplar-based instructed second language development and classroom experience. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167, 210234.
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.), (2013). Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Tyler, A. E., & Ortega, L. (2018). Usage-inspired L2 instruction. An emergent, researched pedagogy. In Tyler, A. E., Ortega, L., Uno, M., & Park, H. I. (Eds.). Usage-inspired L2 instruction. Researched pedagogy (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

OBSERVING THE EMERGENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONAL KNOWLEDGE: VERB PATTERNS IN GERMAN AND SPANISH LEARNERS OF ENGLISH AT DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS

  • Ute Römer (a1) and Cynthia M. Berger (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed