Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-6kn8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T15:41:01.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Jürgen M. Meisel ,
Harald Clahsen  and
Manfred Pienemann
Jürgen M. Meisel
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Harald Clahsen
Affiliation:
Univeisität Wuppertal
Manfred Pienemann
Affiliation:
Univeisität Wuppertal
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Research on Second Language (L2) Acquisition, over the past ten years, has undergone substantial changes by shifting its focus of interest away from an analysis of linguistic structures alone, concentrating more on the learner himself or, rather, on the process of learning. It had become obvious that one of the major shortcomings in contrastive studies as well as in the usual kind of error analysis is that they lack thorough investigation of factors which determine the kind of approach a learner may take to acquire a second language. This again implies that it is more fruitful to study the process of learning itself instead of merely analysing its outputs. It is by now widely accepted that the learner takes an active part in the learning process and does not merely get trapped in structural gaps which linguists may find when comparing the source language (the learner's L1) and the target language (L2).

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Spring 1981 , pp. 109 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

Bailey, C.-J. N. 1972 The practical value of abstract syntax for the ordinary working grammarian. Studies in language and linguistics, ed. by Ewton, R. W. Jr. and Ornstein, J., 1–11. El Paso: Texas Western Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N.. 1976. The state of non-state linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 5.98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N.. 1977. Variation and linguistic analysis. Papiere zur Linguistik 12. 5–56.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N., Madden, C., and Krashen, S.. 1974. Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult second language learning? Language Learning 24.235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bever, T. G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the development of language, ed. by Hayes, J. R., 279–362. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. A first language. The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. B. 1968. The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child Development 39.433–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cazden, C.B., Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., and Schumann, J. H. 1975. Second language acquisition in children, adolescents, and adults. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1979. Syntax oder Produktionsstrategien? Zum natürlichen Zweitspracherwerb der ‘Gastarbeiter.’ Bildung und Ausbildung, ed. by Kloepfer, R. et al. , 343–54. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1980. Psycholinguistic aspects of L2 acquisition: word order phenomena in foreign worker's interlanguage. Second language development: Trends and issues, ed. by Felix, S. W., 57–79. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., and Meisel, J. M.. 1980. Eine psycholinguistische Rechtfertigung von Wortstellungsregeln im Deutschen. Papiere zur Linguistik 21.3–25.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. C., and Burt, M. K.. 1973. Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning 23.245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C., and Burt, M. K.. 1974. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24.37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathman, A. K. 1979. Similarities and simplification in the interlanguage of second language learners. The notions of simplification, interlanguages and pidgins and their relation to second language pedagogy, ed. by Corder, S. P. and Roulet, E., 30–8. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Felix, S. W. 1976. Linguistische Untersuchungen zum englischdeutschen Zweitsprachener-werbunter natürlichen Bedingungen. Arbeitspapiere zum Spracherwerb 18. Kiel.Google Scholar
Felix, S. W. 1977. Interference, interlanguage, and related issues. In Molony, C. H., ed. 237–58.Google Scholar
Felix, S. W. (ed.) 1980. Second Language development. Trends and issues. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C., and Lambert, W. E.. 1972. Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C., and Lambert, W. E., Smythe, P. C., Kirby, D. M., and Bramwell, J. R.. 1974. Second language acquisition: a social psychological approach. Final Report (Ontario Ministry of Education, Grant-in-Aid to Education), London, Ontario.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1956. Bilingualism in the Americas: a bibliography and research guide. (Publication of the American Dialect Society no. 28). University, Ala.: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Heidelberger Forschungsprojekt ‘Pidgin-Deutsch spanischer und italienischer Arbeiter in der Bundesrepublik’ (HPD). 1976. Untersuchungen zur Erlernung des Deutschen durch auslan-dische Arbeiter. (Manuscript).Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. 1977. Implication patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning 27.383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, W. T. 1975. The transmission of functional information and social information in learners' speech. Paper presented at AILA Congress 1975, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 1977. The language of foreign workers in Germany. Deutsch im Kontakt mit anderen Sprachen—German in contact with other languages, ed. by Molony, C. H., Zobl, H., and Stölting, W., 184–212. Kronberg, Ts.: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 1980. Linguistic simplification: a study of immigrant workers' speech and foreigner talk. Second language development. Trends and issues, ed. by Felix, S. W., 13–40. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M., and Pam, M. (eds.). 1979. Linear order and generative theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M., and Pam, M. (eds.)., Pienemanri, M., and Thiel, M.. 1976. The acquisition of German by foreign workers. Sociolinguistics Newsletter 7.9–10.Google Scholar
Molony, C. H. 1977. ‘Ich bin sprechen Deutsch aber’: the sequence of verb and word order acquisition of an American child learning German. Deutsch im Kontakt mit anderen Sprachen—German in contact with other languages. Kronberg, Ts.: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H.. 1957. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Pam, M. D. 1979. Problems in the description of German word order. Linear order and generative theory, ed. by Meisel, J. M. and Pam, M., 289–315. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1979a. Erwerbssequenzen und Lehrprogression Uberlegungen zur Steuerung des Zweitspracherwerbs, Bildung und Ausbildung in der Romania, ed. by Kloepfer, R. et al. , 398–416. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1979b. Der Zweitspracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiterkinder. Wuppertal University Dissertation.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. 1975. Second language acquisition: the pidginization hypothesis. Harvard University Dissertation.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. 1976. Social distance as a factor in second language acquisition. Paper presented at TESOL Convention, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauble, A.-M. 1977. The process of decreolization: a model for second language development. Los Angeles: UCLA. (Manuscript).Google Scholar
Wode, H. 1976. Developmental sequences in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Arbeitspapiere zum Spracherwerb 12. Kiel.Google Scholar