Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-23T17:10:49.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REEXAMINING THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE HYPOTHESIS

What Can Early Bilinguals Tell Us?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Silvina Montrul
Silvina Montrul*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
*
*Address correspondence to: Silvina Montrul, Department of Linguistics and Department of Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 4080 Foreign Languages Building, MC-176, 707 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801; e-mail: montrul@uiuc.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fundamental difference hypothesis (FDH), as formulated by Bley-Vroman (1990), claims that SLA tends to be nonconvergent because domain-specific linguistic mechanisms available in early childhood cannot be used for language learning in adulthood: Instead, second language (L2) learners deploy domain-general problem solving skills. I claim that nonconvergence is also true of some cases of unbalanced early bilingualism, when the target language was acquired in childhood, suggesting that nontarget attainment in these cases may have different roots—namely, inefficient learning mechanisms in L2 learners but insufficient input in early bilinguals. The FDH then predicts that early bilinguals should still be more successful at attaining nativelike knowledge than the L2 learners due to their early age of acquisition. This review article examines this prediction in light of recent studies of postpuberty L2 learners and unbalanced early bilinguals with nonconvergent knowledge of their first language. I show that the incidence of nativelike achievement is higher in the early bilingual groups than in the L2 groups and that differential performance by the two populations on different tasks lends some support to the processing claims of the FDH.

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 31 , Special Issue 2: THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE HYPOTHESIS TWENTY YEARS LATER , June 2009 , pp. 225 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. (1999). Loss of gender agreement in L1 attrition: Preliminary results. Bilingual Research Journal, 23, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, T., Knightly, L., Jun, S., & Oh, J. (2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13, 238–243.Google Scholar
Au, T., Knightly, L., Jun, S., Oh, J., & Romo, L. (2008). Salvaging a childhood language. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 998–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., & Ryan, E. (1985). A metacognitive framework for the development of first and second language skills. In Forrester-Pressley, D. L., MacKinnon, G. E., & Waller, T. G. (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (pp. 207–252). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S., & Ioup, G. (1988). The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, 4, 1–32.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R., & Yoshinaga, N. (1991). Broad and narrow constraints on the English dative alternation: Some fundamental differences between native speakers and foreign language learners. University of Hawai‘i Working Papers in ESL, 11, 157–199.Google Scholar
Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In Roeper, T. & Williams, E. (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 123–172). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (1997). Verb complementation, coreference and tense in the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. In Perez-Leroux, A. T. & Glass, W. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in the acquisition of Spanish (pp. 167–180). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2002). Verb raising in Spanish, a comparison of early and late bilinguals. In Skarabela, B., Fish, S., & Do, A. H.-J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 84–94). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J., & White, L. (2003). The L2 acquisition of Spanish DPs: The status of grammatical features. In Pérez-Leroux, A. T. & Liceras, J. (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1/L2 connection (pp. 151–176). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1977). Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 425–504.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of Universal Grammar in adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2, 93–119.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–534.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dekydstpotter, L., & Sprouse, R. A. (2001). Mental design and second language epistemology: Adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English-French interlanguage. Second Language Research, 17, 1–35.Google Scholar
Dekydstpotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Anderson, B. (1997). The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: The process-result distinction in English-French interlanguage grammars. Language Acquisition, 6, 297–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 143–188.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, F. (2005). Fossilized second language grammars: The acquisition of grammatical gender. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guillelmon, D., & Grosjean, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 29, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Håkansson, G. (1995). Syntax and morphology in language attrition: A study of five bilingual expatriate Swedes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y.-H. (1997). The partial accessibility of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed formal features hypothesis.’ Second Language Research, 13, 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Franceschina, F. (2004). Explaining the acquisition and non-acquisition of determiner-noun gender concord in French and Spanish. In Prévost, P. & Paradis, J. (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts (pp. 175–205). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1977). Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning, 27, 383–411.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.Google Scholar
Juffs, A. (2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21, 121–151.Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483–516.Google Scholar
Kanno, K. (1998). The stability of UG principles in second language acquisition: Evidence from Japanese. Linguistics, 36, 1125–1146.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., & Yoon, J. (2009). Binding interpretation of anaphors in Korean heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 16, 3–35.Google Scholar
Knightly, L., Jun, S., Oh, J., & Au, T. (2003). Production benefits of childhood overhearing. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 114, 465–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondo-Brown, K. (2005). Differences in language skills: Heritage language learner subgroups and foreign language learners. Modern Language Journal, 89, 563–581.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In Ellis, N. C. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45–78). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-G., Kim, H.-S., Kong, H., Hong, J.-M., & Long, M. (2008). Variation of the linguistic profiles of advanced English-speaking learners of Korean. In Brinton, D., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp.165–180). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (1986). Word order and case marking in early child language: Evidence from simultaneous acquisition of two first languages—French and German. Linguistics, 24, 123–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (1997). The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language development. Second Language Research, 13, 227–263.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 39–68.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125–142.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2005). Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: Exploring some differences and similarities. Second Language Research, 21, 199–249.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2006). Incomplete acquisition as a feature of L2 and bilingual grammars. In Slabakova, R., Montrul, S., & Prévost, P. (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia White (pp. 335–360). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (in press). How similar are L2 learners and heritage speakers? Spanish clitics and word order. Applied Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M. (in press). Back to basics: Differential object marking under incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008a). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503–553.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008b). Knowledge of wh-movement in Spanish L2 learners and heritage speakers. In Almazán, M., Bruhn de Garavito, J., & Valenzuela, E. (Eds.), Selected papers from the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 93–106). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., Perpiñán, S., Thornhill, D., & Vidal, S. (2006). Full access and age effects in adult bilingualism: An investigation of accusative clitics and word order. In Sagarra, N. & Toribio, J. (Eds.), Selected papers from the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 217–228). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Potowski, K. (2007). Command of gender agreement in school-age Spanish bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 301–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite / imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351–398.Google Scholar
Newport, E. (1988). Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American Sign Language. Language Sciences, 10, 147–172.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., & Choo, M. (2001). The acquisition of relative clauses by heritage and non-heritage learners of Korean as a second language: A comparative study. Journal of Korean Language Education, 12, 283–294.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a non-native phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–283.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patkowsky, M. (1980). The sensitivity period for the acquisition of a second language in syntax. Language Learning, 30, 449–472.Google Scholar
Pérez Leroux, A. T., & Glass, W. (1999). Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: Probabilistic versus generative approaches. Second Language Research, 15, 220–249.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (1997). American Russian: Language loss meets language acquisition. In Browne, W., Dornisch, E., Kondrashova, N., & Zec, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual workshop on formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Cornell meeting, 1995 (pp. 370–406). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191–262.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2008a). Heritage language narratives. In Brinton, D., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 149–164). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2008b). Russian gender under incomplete acquisition. The Heritage Language Journal, 6. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.heritagelanguages.org/.Google Scholar
Potowski, K., Jegerski, J., & Morgan-Short, K. (in press). The effects of instruction on linguistic development in Spanish heritage language speakers. Language Learning.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 110–133.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Null subjects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 501–557.Google Scholar
Schachter, J. (1990). On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 6, 93–124.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (2003). Child L2 acquisition: Paving the way. In Beachley, B., Brown, A., & Conlin, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 26–50). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access hypothesis. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.Google Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, M. (1989). Crosslinguistic influence in language loss. In Hyltenstam, K. & Obler, L. (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan (pp. 185–201). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2008). Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sobin, N. (1987). The variable status of comp-trace phenomena. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 33–60.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (1993). Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in native and non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22–47.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23, 215–242.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Roussou, A. (1991). Parameter resetting in L2? University of Cambridge Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 149–169.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, G. (2000). Introduction. In Valdés, G. (Ed.), Spanish for native speakers: Vol. 1. AATSP professional development series handbook for teachers K–16 (pp. 1–3). New York: Harcourt College.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In Lightfoot, D. & Hornstein, N. (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305–363). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, L. (2008). Some puzzling features of L2 features. In Liceras, J. M., Zobl, H., & Goodluck, H. (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 301–326). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
White, L., & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 238–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L., & Juffs, A. (1998). Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of nonnative language acquisition: Competence and processing. In Flynn, S., Martohardjono, G., & O’Neil, W. (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 111–129). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M., & Leung, Y.-K. I. (2004). Gender agreement in nonnative Spanish: Evidence against failed features. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 105–133.Google Scholar
Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar