Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • Niclas Abrahamsson (a1) and Kenneth Hyltenstam (a1)

Results from a number of recent studies suggest that nativelike adult second language (L2) learners possess a high degree of language learning aptitude, the positive effects of which may have compensated for the negative effects of a critical period in these learners. According to the same studies, child learners seem to attain a nativelike command of the L2 regardless of high or low aptitude, which has led researchers to conclude that this factor plays no role in early acquisition. The present study investigates the L2 proficiency and language aptitude of 42 near-native L2 speakers of Swedish (i.e., individuals whom actual mother-tongue speakers of Swedish believe are native speakers). The results confirm previous research suggesting that a high degree of language aptitude is required if adult learners are to reach a L2 proficiency that is indistinguishable from that of native speakers. However, in contrast to previous studies, the present results also identify small yet significant aptitude effects in child SLA. Our findings lead us to the conclusions that the rare nativelike adult learners sometimes observed would all turn out to be exceptionally talented language learners with an unusual ability to compensate for maturational effects and, consequently, that their nativelikeness per se does not constitute a reason to reject the critical period hypothesis.

Corresponding author
Niclas Abrahamsson, Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

E. Bialystok (1997). The structure of age: In search of barriers of second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 116137.

D. Birdsong (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706755.

D. Birdsong (2005b). Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research. IRAL, 43, 319328.

D. Birdsong (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, 949.

D. Birdsong (2007). Nativelike pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 99116). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

D. Birdsong & M. Molis (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235249.

T. Bongaerts , C. van Summeren , B. Planken , & E. Schils (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447465.

S. Felix (1985). More evidence on competing cognitive systems. Second Language Research, 1, 4772.

J.E. Flege , G.H. Yeni-Komshian , & S. Liu (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78104.

N. Geschwind & A.M. Galaburda (1985). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology, I–III. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 428–459, 521–552, 634–654.

E.L. Grigorenko , R.J. Sternberg , & M.E. Ehrman (2000). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The Canal-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal, 84, 390405.

B. Harley & D. Hart (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 379400.

K. Hyltenstam (1992). Non-native features of near-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 351368). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

K. Hyltenstam & N. Abrahamsson (2000). Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none? On the maturational constraints controversy in second language acquisition. Studia Linguistica, 54, 150166.

K. Hyltenstam & N. Abrahamsson (2001). Age and L2 learning: The hazards of matching practical “implications” with theoretical “facts.” TESOL Quarterly, 35, 151170.

J.S. Johnson & E.L. Newport (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 6099.

M.H. Long (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. IRAL, 43, 287317.

S.H. Marinova-Todd , D.B. Marshall , & C.E. Snow (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 934.

J.L. McDonald (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395423.

J.L. McDonald (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanation for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381401.

A. Moyer (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81108.

H.J. Neville & D. Bavelier (1998). Neural organization and plasticity of language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 254258.

M. Patkowski (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449472.

C. Peterson & A. Al-Haik (1976). The development of the Defence Language Aptitude Battery. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 369380.

F. Pulvermüller & J.H. Schumann (1994). Neurobiological mechanisms of language acquisition. Language Learning, 44, 681734.

P. Robinson (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 4599.

S. Ross , N. Yoshinaga , & M. Sasaki (2002). Aptitude-exposure interaction effects on wh-movement violation detection by pre- and post-critical period Japanese bilinguals. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 267299). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

E.I. Schneiderman & C. Desmarais (1988). The talented language learner: Some preliminary findings. Second Language Research, 4, 91109.

L. Selinker (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 209231.

P. Skehan (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 6993). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

H.B.M. Uylings (2006). Development of the human cortex and the concept of “critical” or “sensitive” periods. Language Learning, 56 (1 yes), 5990.

S. Van Boxtel , T. Bongaerts , & P.-A. Coppen (2005). Native-like attainment of dummy subjects in Dutch and the role of the L1. IRAL, 43, 355380.

L. White & F. Genesee (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233265.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 68
Total number of PDF views: 483 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1151 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.