Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

THE ROBUSTNESS OF APTITUDE EFFECTS IN NEAR-NATIVE SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

  • Niclas Abrahamsson (a1) and Kenneth Hyltenstam (a1)
Abstract

Results from a number of recent studies suggest that nativelike adult second language (L2) learners possess a high degree of language learning aptitude, the positive effects of which may have compensated for the negative effects of a critical period in these learners. According to the same studies, child learners seem to attain a nativelike command of the L2 regardless of high or low aptitude, which has led researchers to conclude that this factor plays no role in early acquisition. The present study investigates the L2 proficiency and language aptitude of 42 near-native L2 speakers of Swedish (i.e., individuals whom actual mother-tongue speakers of Swedish believe are native speakers). The results confirm previous research suggesting that a high degree of language aptitude is required if adult learners are to reach a L2 proficiency that is indistinguishable from that of native speakers. However, in contrast to previous studies, the present results also identify small yet significant aptitude effects in child SLA. Our findings lead us to the conclusions that the rare nativelike adult learners sometimes observed would all turn out to be exceptionally talented language learners with an unusual ability to compensate for maturational effects and, consequently, that their nativelikeness per se does not constitute a reason to reject the critical period hypothesis.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Niclas Abrahamsson, Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; e-mail: niclas.abrahamsson@biling.su.se
References
Hide All
Abrahamsson N. & Hyltenstam K., (in press). Age of acquisition and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception vs. linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning.
Bialystok E. (1997). The structure of age: In search of barriers of second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 116137.
Bialystok E. (2002). On the reliability of robustness: A reply to DeKeyser. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 481488.
Bialystok E. & Hakuta K. (1999). Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In Birdsong D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 161181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Birdsong D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706755.
Birdsong D. (1999). Introduction: Whys and why nots of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. In Birdsong D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Birdsong D. (2005a). Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In Kroll J. & De Groot A. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 109127). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Birdsong D. (2005b). Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research. IRAL, 43, 319328.
Birdsong D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, 949.
Birdsong D. (2007). Nativelike pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language. In Bohn O.-S. & Munro M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 99116). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Birdsong D. & Molis M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235249.
Bley-Vroman R. (1988). The fundamental character of foreign language learning. In Rutherford W. & Smith M. Sharwood (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 133159). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Bley-Vroman R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass S. M. & Schachter J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 4168). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bongaerts T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In Birdsong D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bongaerts T., van Summeren C., Planken B., & Schils E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447465.
Butler Y.G. (2000). The age effect in second language acquisition: Is it too late to acquire native-level competence in a second language after the age of seven? In Oshima-Takane Y., Shirai Y., & Sirai H. (Eds.), Studies in language sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 159169). Tokyo: The Japanese Society for Language Sciences.
Carroll J.B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign-language teaching. International Journal of Psycholingistics, 2, 514.
Carroll J.B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research in foreign language aptitude. In Diller K. C. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Carroll J.B. & Sapon S. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test: Form A. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Colantoni L. & Steele J. (2006). Native-like attainment in the L2 acquisition of Spanish stop-liquid clusters. In Klee C. A. & Face T. L. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 5973). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Cranshaw A. (1997). A study of Anglophone native and near-native linguistic and metalinguistic performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Montreal, Canada.
DeKeyser R.M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499533.
Dörnyei Z. & Skehan P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty C. J. & Long M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 612630). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ekberg L. (1998). Regeltillämpning kontra lexikonkunskap i svenskan hos invandrarbarn i Malmö [Rule application versus lexical knowledge in the Swedish of immigrant children in Malmoe]. In Møller J., Quist P., Holmen A., & Jørgensen J. N. (Eds.), Nordiske sprog som andetsprog (pp. 99116). Copenhagen: Institut for humanistiske fag, Danmarks Lærerhøjskole.
Ekberg L. (2004). Grammatik och lexikon i svenska som andraspråk på nästan infödd nivå [Grammar and lexicon in Swedish as a second language at the near-native level]. In Hyltenstam K. & Lindberg I. (Eds.), Svenska som andraspråk: I forskning, undervisning och samhälle (pp. 221258). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
Felix S. (1985). More evidence on competing cognitive systems. Second Language Research, 1, 4772.
Flege J.E., Yeni-Komshian G.H., & Liu S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78104.
Geschwind N. & Galaburda A.M. (1985). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology, I–III. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 428–459, 521–552, 634–654.
Gilleece L.F. (2006). An empirical investigation of the association between musical aptitude and foreign language aptitude. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Dublin, Trinity College.
Gregg K.R. (1996). The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In Ritchie W. C. & Bhatia T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 4981). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Grigorenko E.L., Sternberg R.J., & Ehrman M.E. (2000). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The Canal-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal, 84, 390405.
Harley B. & Hart D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 379400.
Harley B. & Hart D. (2002). Age, aptitude, and second language learning on a bilingual exchange. In Robinson P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 302330). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hene B. (1993). Utlandsadopterade barns och svenska barns ordförståelse: En jämförelse mellan barn i åldern 10–12 år [Internationally adopted children's and Swedish children's word comprehension: A comparison of children aged 10–12 years]. SPRINS-gruppen 41. Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborgs Universitet.
Hyltenstam K. (1992). Non-native features of near-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In Harris R. J. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 351368). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hyltenstam K. & Abrahamsson N. (2000). Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none? On the maturational constraints controversy in second language acquisition. Studia Linguistica, 54, 150166.
Hyltenstam K. & Abrahamsson N. (2001). Age and L2 learning: The hazards of matching practical “implications” with theoretical “facts.” TESOL Quarterly, 35, 151170.
Hyltenstam K. & Abrahamsson N. (2003a). Age of onset and ultimate attainment in near-native speakers of Swedish. In Fraurud K. & Hyltenstam K. (Eds.), Multilingualism in global and local perspectives: Selected papers from the 8th Nordic Conference on Bilingualism, November 1–3, 2001, Stockholm Rinkeby (pp. 319340). Stockholm: Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, and Rinkeby Institute of Multilingual Research.
Hyltenstam K. & Abrahamsson N. (2003b). Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty C. J. & Long M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539588). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ioup G. (1989). Immigrant children who have failed to acquire native English. In Gass S. M., Madden C., Preston D., & Selinker L. (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Vol. 2. Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 160175). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Ioup G., Boustagui E., El Tigi M., & Moselle M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 7398.
Johnson J.S. & Newport E.L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 6099.
Krashen S.D. (1977). The monitor model of adult second language performance. In Burt M., Dulay H., & Finocchiaro M. (Eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language (pp. 152161). New York: Regents.
Krashen S.D. (1981). Aptitude and attitude in relation to second language acquisition and learning. In Diller K. C. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 155175). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Lenneberg E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Long M.H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251285.
Long M.H. (1993). Second language acquisition as a function of age: Research findings and methodological issues. In Hyltenstam K. & Viberg Å. (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 196221). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Long M.H. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. IRAL, 43, 287317.
Long M.H. & Robinson P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In Doughty C. J. & Williams J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 1641). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marinova-Todd S.H. (2003). Comprehensive analysis of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Marinova-Todd S.H., Marshall D.B., & Snow C.E. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 934.
McDonald J.L. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395423.
McDonald J.L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanation for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381401.
Meara P. (2005a). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Swansea, UK: Lognostics.
Meara P. (2005b). LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea, UK: Lognostics.
Meara P., Milton J., & Lorenzo-Dus N. (2003). Swansea language aptitude tests (LAT) v2.0. Swansea, UK: Lognostics.
Montrul S. & Slabakova R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351398.
Moyer A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81108.
Neville H.J. & Bavelier D. (1998). Neural organization and plasticity of language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 254258.
Novoa L.K., Fein D., & Obler L. (1988). Talent in foreign languages: A case study. In Obler L. K. & Fein D. (Eds.), The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 294302). New York: Guilford Press.
Obler L.K. (1989). Exceptional second language learners. In Gass S. M., Madden C., Preston D., & Selinker L. (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition (pp. 141149). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Ottó I. (1996). Hungarian language aptitude test: Words in sentences. Unpublished manuscript, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Parry T.S. & Child J.R. (1990). Preliminary investigation of the relationship between VORD, MLAT and language proficiency. In Parry T. S. & Stansfield C. W. (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 3066). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Patkowski M. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449472.
Peterson C. & Al-Haik A. (1976). The development of the Defence Language Aptitude Battery. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 369380.
Pimsleur P. (1966). The Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovic.
Pulvermüller F. & Schumann J.H. (1994). Neurobiological mechanisms of language acquisition. Language Learning, 44, 681734.
Robinson P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 4599.
Ross S., Yoshinaga N., & Sasaki M. (2002). Aptitude-exposure interaction effects on wh-movement violation detection by pre- and post-critical period Japanese bilinguals. In Robinson P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 267299). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Sasaki M. (1996). Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence: Quantitative and qualitative analyses. Bern: Peter Lang.
Schneider W., Eschman A., & Zuccolotto A. (2002a). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
Schneider W., Eschman A., & Zuccolotto A. (2002b). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
Schneiderman E.I. & Desmarais C. (1988). The talented language learner: Some preliminary findings. Second Language Research, 4, 91109.
Seliger H.W. (1978). Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning. In Ritchie W. C. (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications (pp. 1119). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Seliger H.W., Krashen S., & Ladefoged P. (1975). Maturational constraints in the acquisition of a native-like accent in second language learning. Language Sciences, 36, 2022.
Selinker L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 209231.
Skehan P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.
Skehan P. (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In Robinson P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 6993). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Sorace A. & Robertson D. (2001). Measuring development and ultimate attainment in non-native grammars. In Elder C., Brown A., Grove E., Hill K., Iwashita N., Lumley T., & al. et (Eds.), Experimenting with uncertainty: Essays in honour of Alan Davies (pp. 264274). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Uylings H.B.M. (2006). Development of the human cortex and the concept of “critical” or “sensitive” periods. Language Learning, 56 (1yes), 5990.
Van Boxtel S., Bongaerts T., & Coppen P.-A. (2005). Native-like attainment of dummy subjects in Dutch and the role of the L1. IRAL, 43, 355380.
Van Wuijtswinkel K. (1994). Critical period effects in the acquisition of grammatical competence in a second language. Unpublished B.A. thesis, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
White L. & Genesee F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233265.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 83
Total number of PDF views: 641 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1557 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.