Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T22:25:13.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ROLE OF LEXICAL TEMPORAL INDICATORS AND TEXT INTERACTION FORMAT IN THE INCIDENTAL ACQUISITION OF THE SPANISH FUTURE TENSE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2007

Amy E. Rossomondo
Amy E. Rossomondo
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study utilizes traditional silent reading and a think-aloud procedure to investigate the role of lexical cues to meaning in the incidental acquisition of the Spanish future tense. A total of 161 beginning-level university students of Spanish participated in the study. Two versions of a reading passage that contained 13 target items were created: One version contained a title and lexical temporal indicators (LTIs) in each sentence that contained a target verb, whereas the passage appeared with no title and no lexical cues in the second version. Both procedures employed the same tasks to measure the effects of LTIs on learner comprehension and processing of the 13 novel forms. The tasks were scored and submitted to statistical analysis. Results indicate that for both the silent reading and the think-aloud conditions, LTIs augment learner comprehension and do not detract from learners' noticing of forms. Furthermore, the text interaction format of the think-aloud protocol was found to significantly enhance recognition and production of the previously unfamiliar forms in the input.I wish to thank James F. Lee, who guided me through the realization of this project and continues to provide intellectual support. Additionally, I appreciate the feedback and encouragement provided by Kimberly Geeslin, who read many versions of this article. This investigation was supported by the University of Kansas New Faculty General Research Fund. Finally, I wish to acknowledge the anonymous SSLA reviewers for their insightful criticisms and comments. All errors are my own.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 39 - 66
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barcroft, J. & VanPatten, B. (1997). Acoustic salience of grammatical forms: The effect of location, stress, and boundedness on Spanish L2 input processing. In W. Glass & A. Pérez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish: Vol. 2. Production, processing and comprehension (pp. 109–121). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Bowles, M. & Leow, R. (2005). Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 415–440.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (2000). Exploring strategies in test taking: Fine-tuning verbal reports from respondents. In G. Ekbatani & H. Pierson (Eds.), Learner-directed assessment in ESL (pp. 127–150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ericsson, K. & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1–46.Google Scholar
Greenslade, T., Bouden, L., & Sanz, C. (1999). Attending to form and content in processing reading texts. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3, 65–90.Google Scholar
Huckin, T. & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: A review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 181–193.Google Scholar
Jourdenais, R. (2001). Protocol analysis and SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language acquisition (pp. 354–375). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. (1993). The power of reading. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Lee, J.F. (1987). Comprehending the Spanish subjunctive: An information processing perspective. Modern Language Journal, 70, 50–57.Google Scholar
Lee, J.F. (1998). The relationship of verb morphology to second language reading comprehension and input processing. Modern Language Journal, 82, 33–48.Google Scholar
Lee, J.F. (1999). On levels of processing and levels of comprehension. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & F. Martínez-Gil (Eds.), Advances in Hispanic linguistics (pp. 42–59). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Lee, J.F. (2002a). The incidental acquisition of Spanish future morphology through reading in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 55–80.Google Scholar
Lee, J.F. (2002b). The initial impact of reading as input for the acquisition of future tense morphology in Spanish. In S. M. Gass, K. Bardovi-Harlig, S. Sieloff, & J. Walz (Eds.), Pedagogical norms for second and foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 119–141). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lee, J.F., Cadierno, T., Glass, W., & VanPatten, B. (1997). The effects of lexical and grammatical cues on processing past temporal reference in second language input. Applied Language Learning, 8, 1–23.Google Scholar
Lee, J.F. & Rodríguez, R. (1997). The effects of lexemic and morphosyntactic modifications on L2 reading comprehension and input processing. In W. Glass & A. Pérez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish: Vol. 2. Production, processing and comprehension (pp. 135–157). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Lee, J.F. & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Leeser, M. (2003). Second language comprehension and processing grammatical form: The effects of topic familiarity, mode, and pausing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Leeser, M. (2004). The effects of topic familiarity, mode, and pausing on second language learners' comprehension and focus on form. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 587–615.Google Scholar
Leow, R. (1993). To simplify or not to simplify: A look at intake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 333–355.Google Scholar
Leow, R. (1995). Modality and intake in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 79–89.Google Scholar
Leow, R. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151–182.Google Scholar
Leow, R. (2000). Attention, awareness, and focus on form research: A critical overview. In J. F. Lee & A. Valdman (Eds.), Form and meaning: Multiple perspectives (pp. 69–96). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Leow, R. (2001). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84, 496–509.Google Scholar
Leow, R. & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 35–57.Google Scholar
Mellow, J. & Cumming, A. (1994). Concord in interlanguage: Efficiency or priming? Applied Linguistics, 15, 442–473.Google Scholar
Musumeci, D. (1989). The ability of second language learners to assign tense at the sentence level: A crosslinguistic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.
Rosa, E. & O'Neill, M. (1998). Effects of stress and location on acoustic salience at the initial stages of Spanish L2 input processing. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 24–52.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i.
Shook, D. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57–93.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183–203.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
VanPatten, B. (2003). From input to output: A teacher's guide to second language acquisition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in SLA. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5–32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.