Skip to main content
×
×
Home

SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING RESEARCH AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SLA: Intersections and Practical Applications

  • Dana R. Ferris (a1)
Abstract

For more than a decade now, a great deal of research has been done on the topic of written corrective feedback (CF) in SLA and second language (L2) writing. Nonetheless, what those research efforts really have shown as well as the possible implications for practice remain in dispute. Although L2 writing and SLA researchers often examine similar phenomena in similar ways, they do not necessarily ask the same questions. SLA-focused researchers investigate whether written CF facilitates the acquisition of particular linguistic features. In contrast, L2 writing researchers generally emphasize the question of whether written CF helps student writers improve the overall effectiveness of their texts. Understanding these differences in starting points is important because it provides a possible explanation for the conflicting methodologies and conclusions of various reviews on this topic (e.g., Ferris, 2003, 2004; Truscott, 1996, 2007). This article briefly traces the history of these two parallel lines of research on written CF and notes both contrasts and convergences. It then moves to a focused discussion of the possible implications and applications of this body of work for the L2 language and writing classroom and for future research efforts.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Address correspondence to: Dana R. Ferris, 3301 Morro Bay Ave., Davis, CA 95616; e-mail: drferris@ucdavis.edu.
References
Hide All
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227258.
Bates, L., Lane, J., & Lange, E. (1993). Writing clearly: Responding to ESL compositions. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102118.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409431.
Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227258.
Brannon, L., & Knoblauch, C. H. (1982). On students’ rights to their own texts: A model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication, 33, 157166.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267296.
Chandler, J. (2004). A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 345348.
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161170.
Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 3960.
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353371.
Eskey, D. E. (1983). Meanwhile, back in the real world…: Accuracy and fluency in second language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 315323.
Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In Kroll, B. F. (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R. (1995a). Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their most serious and frequent errors? CATESOL Journal, 8, 4162.
Ferris, D. R. (1995b). Teaching ESL composition students to become independent self-editors. TESOL Journal, 4, 1822.
Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 110.
Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 4962.
Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81104). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161184.
Frodesen, J. (1991). Grammar in writing. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed., pp. 264276). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Hartwell, P. (1985). Grammar, grammars, and the teaching of grammar. College English, 47, 105127.
Hedgcock, J. S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141163.
Hedgcock, J. S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback on L2 writing. Modern Language Journal, 80, 287308.
Hendrickson, J. M. (1980). The treatment of error in written work. Modern Language Journal, 64, 216221.
Horowitz, D. (1986). Process not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 141144.
Johns, A. M. (1995). Genre and pedagogical purposes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 181190.
Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305313.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1984). Writing: Research, theory and applications. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.
Lalande, J. F. II. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140149.
Lane, J., & Lange, E. (1999). Writing clearly: An editing guide (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In Kroll, B. F. (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 5768). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203218.
Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2006). Second-language composition: Teaching and learning. In Smagorinsky, P. (Ed.), Research on composition: Multiple perspectives on two decades of change (pp. 141169). New York: Teachers College Press.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 3766.
Matsuda, P. K. (2006). Second-language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In Matsuda, P. K., Cox, M., Jordan, J., & Ortmeier-Hooper, C. (Eds.), Second-language writing in the composition classroom: A critical sourcebook (pp. 1430). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277303.
Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students’ texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 273292.
Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 8393.
Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67100.
Semke, H. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195202.
Shaughnessy, M. (1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255283.
Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? Regional Language Center Journal, 23, 103110.
Silva, T. (1988). Comments on Vivian Zamel’s “Recent research on writing pedagogy.” TESOL Quarterly, 22, 517519.
Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In Kroll, B. F. (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 1123). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Silva, T., Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). Broadening the perspective of mainstream composition studies: Some thoughts from the disciplinary margins. Written Communication, 14, 398428.
Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378388.
Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148156.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327369.
Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111122.
Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337343.
Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255272.
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y.-P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292305.
Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195209.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed