Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 49
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Al-Jarrah, Rasheed S. 2016. A suggested model of corrective feedback provision. Ampersand, Vol. 3, p. 98.

    Chen, Sibo Nassaji, Hossein and Liu, Qian 2016. EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: a case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, Vol. 1, Issue. 1,

    Elola, Idoia and Oskoz, Ana 2016. Supporting Second Language Writing Using Multimodal Feedback. Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 49, Issue. 1, p. 58.

    Ene, Estela and Kosobucki, Virginia 2016. Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer. Assessing Writing,

    Ruegg, Rachael 2016. The effect of assessment of process after receiving teacher feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 199.

    Saadat, Mahboobeh Mehrpour, Saeed and Khajavi, Yaser 2016. Internet-Mediated Corrective Feedback for Digital Natives. TESOL Journal, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 233.

    Torres, Julio 2016. Advances in Spanish as a Heritage Language.

    Yang, Luxin 2016. Languaging in story rewriting tasks by Chinese EFL students. Language Awareness, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 241.

    Cánovas Guirao, Josefa Roca de Larios, Julio and Coyle, Yvette 2015. The use of models as a written feedback technique with young EFL learners. System, Vol. 52, p. 63.

    Junqueira, Luciana and Payant, Caroline 2015. “I just want to do it right, but it's so hard”: A novice teacher's written feedback beliefs and practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 27, p. 19.

    Kang, EunYoung and Han, Zhaohong 2015. The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 99, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Lee, Icy Mak, Pauline and Burns, Anne 2015. Bringing innovation to conventional feedback approaches in EFL secondary writing classrooms. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 140.

    Liu, Qiandi and Brown, Dan 2015. Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 30, p. 66.

    Mawlawi Diab, Nuwar 2015. Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?. Assessing Writing, Vol. 24, p. 16.

    Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh Do, Thi Thanh Ha Nguyen, Anh Tuan and Pham, Thi Thanh Thuy 2015. Teaching email requests in the academic context: a focus on the role of corrective feedback. Language Awareness, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 169.

    Nishino, Takako and Atkinson, Dwight 2015. Second language writing as sociocognitive alignment. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 27, p. 37.

    Reynolds, Barry Lee and Anderson, Tom A.F. 2015. Extra-Dimensional In-Class Communications: Action Research Exploring Text Chat Support of Face-to-Face Writing. Computers and Composition, Vol. 35, p. 52.

    Ruegg, Rachael 2015. The relative effects of peer and teacher feedback on improvement in EFL students’ writing ability. Linguistics and Education, Vol. 29, p. 73.

    Tolosa, Constanza Ordóñez, Claudia Lucía and Alfonso, Tania 2015. Online Peer Feedback Between Colombian and New Zealand FL Beginners: A Comparison and Lessons Learned. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 73.

    Abbasian, Gholam-Reza and Bahmani, Poopak 2014. Retrospective vs. Prospective Corrective Feedback Impacts on Developing EFL Learners’ Writing Ability and Learner Autonomy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 4, Issue. 6,



  • Dana R. Ferris (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2010

For more than a decade now, a great deal of research has been done on the topic of written corrective feedback (CF) in SLA and second language (L2) writing. Nonetheless, what those research efforts really have shown as well as the possible implications for practice remain in dispute. Although L2 writing and SLA researchers often examine similar phenomena in similar ways, they do not necessarily ask the same questions. SLA-focused researchers investigate whether written CF facilitates the acquisition of particular linguistic features. In contrast, L2 writing researchers generally emphasize the question of whether written CF helps student writers improve the overall effectiveness of their texts. Understanding these differences in starting points is important because it provides a possible explanation for the conflicting methodologies and conclusions of various reviews on this topic (e.g., Ferris, 2003, 2004; Truscott, 1996, 2007). This article briefly traces the history of these two parallel lines of research on written CF and notes both contrasts and convergences. It then moves to a focused discussion of the possible implications and applications of this body of work for the L2 language and writing classroom and for future research efforts.

Corresponding author
*Address correspondence to: Dana R. Ferris, 3301 Morro Bay Ave., Davis, CA 95616; e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

T. Ashwell (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227258.

J. Bitchener (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102118.

J. Bitchener , & U. Knoch (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409431.

L. Brannon , & C. H. Knoblauch (1982). On students’ rights to their own texts: A model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication, 33, 157166.

J. Chandler (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267296.

J. Chandler (2004). A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 345348.

S. P. Corder (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161170.

R. Ellis (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 3960.

R. Ellis , Y. Sheen , M. Murakami , & H. Takashima (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353371.

D. E. Eskey (1983). Meanwhile, back in the real world…: Accuracy and fluency in second language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 315323.

D. R. Ferris (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 110.

D. R. Ferris (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 4962.

D. R. Ferris , & B. Roberts (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161184.

P. Hartwell (1985). Grammar, grammars, and the teaching of grammar. College English, 47, 105127.

J. S. Hedgcock , & N. Lefkowitz (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141163.

J. S. Hedgcock , & N. Lefkowitz (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback on L2 writing. Modern Language Journal, 80, 287308.

J. M. Hendrickson (1980). The treatment of error in written work. Modern Language Journal, 64, 216221.

D. Horowitz (1986). Process not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 141144.

A. M. Johns (1995). Genre and pedagogical purposes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 181190.

C. G. Kepner (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305313.

J. F. Lalande II. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140149.

I. Leki (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203218.

R. Lyster , & L. Ranta (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 3766.

D. S. Qi , & S. Lapkin (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277303.

J. Reid (1994). Responding to ESL students’ texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 273292.

T. Robb , S. Ross , & I. Shortreed (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 8393.

H. Semke (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195202.

Y. Sheen (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255283.

T. Silva (1988). Comments on Vivian Zamel’s “Recent research on writing pedagogy.” TESOL Quarterly, 22, 517519.

T. Silva , I. Leki , & J. Carson (1997). Broadening the perspective of mainstream composition studies: Some thoughts from the disciplinary margins. Written Communication, 14, 398428.

N. Sommers (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378388.

N. Sommers (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148156.

J. Truscott (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327369.

J. Truscott (1999). The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111122.

J. Truscott (2004). Evidence and conjecture: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337343.

J. Truscott (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255272.

J. Truscott , & A. Y.-P. Hsu (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292305.

V. Zamel (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195209.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *