Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

SEMANTIC AND STRUCTURAL TASKS FOR THE MAPPING COMPONENT OF L2 VOCABULARY LEARNING: TESTING THE TOPRA MODEL FROM A NEW ANGLE

  • Shusaku Kida (a1) and Joe Barcroft (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

The type of processing–resource allocation (TOPRA) model predicts that increasing one type of processing (semantic, structural, or mapping oriented) can decrease other types of processing and their learning counterparts. This study examined how semantic and structural tasks affect the mapping component of second language (L2) vocabulary learning. Japanese-speaking L2 English learners attempted to map secondary meanings of 24 English homographs. Each participant studied them (a) while making pleasantness ratings about word meaning (mapping plus semantic processing); (b) while counting letters in each word (mapping plus structural processing); and (c) without any additional task (mapping only). Results of L1 (first language) and L2 free recalls and L2-to-L1 and L1-to-L2 cued recalls indicated higher free recall in the semantic condition over the structural condition and higher cued recall in the mapping condition over the semantic and structural conditions, providing qualitatively new evidence for TOPRA model predictions.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Shusaku Kida, Institute for Foreign Language Research and Education, 1-7-1, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan, 739-8521. E-mail: skida@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J Barcroft . (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52, 323363. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00186

J Barcroft . (2003). Effects of questions about word meaning during L2 lexical learning. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 546561. doi: 10.1111/1540-4781.00207

J Barcroft . (2004). Effects of sentence writing in L2 lexical acquisition. Second Language Research, 20, 303334. doi: 10.1191/0267658304sr233oa

J Barcroft . (2007). Effects of opportunities for word retrieval during second language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 57, 3556. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00398.x

J Barcroft . (2009). Effects of synonym generation on incidental and intentional L2 vocabulary learning during reading. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 79103. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00228.x

J Barcroft . (2015). Lexical input processing and vocabulary learning. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

D. Bates , M. Maechler , B. M. Bolker , & S Walker . (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 148. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01

P Bogaards . (2001). Lexical units and the learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 321343. doi: 10.1017/S0272263101003011

M. Comesaña , M. Perea , A. Piñeiro , & I Fraga . (2009). Vocabulary teaching strategies and conceptual representations of words in L2 in children: Evidence with novice learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 2223. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.10.004

F. I. M. Craik , & R. S Lockhart . (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 11, 671684. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X

F. I. M. Craik , & E Tulving . (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268294. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268

S. Crossley , T. Salsbury , & D McNamara . (2010). The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers. Language Learning, 60, 573605. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00568.x

C. J Davis . (2005). N-watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 6570. doi: 10.3758/BF03206399

A. M. B. De Groot , & R Keijzer . (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50, 156. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00110

K. Durkin , & J Manning . (1989). Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: Semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 577612. doi: 10.1007/BF01067161

N. C. Ellis , & A Beaton . (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43, 559617. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00627.x

M. Finkbeiner , K. Forster , J. Nicol , & K Nakamura . (2004). The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 122. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.004

M. Harrington , & W Jiang . (2013). Focus on the forms: From recognition practice in Chinese vocabulary learning. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 132145.

T. Hothorn , F. Bretz , & P Westfall . (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50, 346363. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810425

J. H Hulstijn . (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P. J. Arnaud , & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113125). London, UK: Macmillan.

T. S. Hyde , & J. J Jenkins . (1969). The differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 472481. doi: 10.1037/h0028372

N Jiang . (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21, 4777. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.1.47

J. A. Linck , & I Cunnings . (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65, 185207. doi: 10.1111/lang.12117

L. Lotto , & A. M. B de Groot . (1998). Effects of learning method and word type on acquiring vocabulary in an unfamiliar language. Language Learning, 48, 3169. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00032

S. Morimoto , & S Loewen . (2007). A comparison of the effects of image-schema-based instruction and translation-based instruction on the acquisition of L2 polysemous words. Language Teaching Research, 11, 347372. doi: 10.1177/1362168807081181

C. D. Morris , J. D. Bransford , & J. J Franks . (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 16, 519533. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9

S. Nakagawa , & H Schielzeth . (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 133142. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x

I. S. P Nation . (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

P Nation . (2007). Fundamental issues in modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. H. Daller , J. Milton , & J. T. Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 3543). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

M. Pressley , J. R. Levin , & G. E Miller . (1982a). The keyword method compared to alternative vocabulary-learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 5060. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(82)90007-8

M. Pressley , J. R. Levin , N. A. Kuiper , S. L. Bryant , & S Michener . (1982b). Mnemonic versus non-mnemonic vocabulary-learning strategies: Additional comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 693707. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.74.5.693

P Prince . (1996). Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translation as a function of proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 478493. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05468.x

H. L. Roediger , & M. J Guynn . (1996). Retrieval processes. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 197236). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

J. M Royer . (1973). Memory effects for test-like events during acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Psychological Reports, 32, 195198. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1973.32.1.195

N Schmitt . (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48, 281317. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00042

B. D Schwartz . (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147163. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100011931

B. S Stein . (1978). Depth of processing reexamined: The effects of the precision of encoding and test appropriateness. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 165174. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90128-7

H. L. Storkel , & J Maekawa . (2005). A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: The role of phonotactic probability and word frequency. Journal of Child Language, 32, 827853. doi: 10.1017/S0305000905007099

T Tinkham . (1993). The effect of semantic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. System, 21, 371380. doi: 10.1016/0346-251X(93)90027-E

M. Verspoor , & W Lowie . (2003). Making sense of polysemous words. Language Learning, 53, 547586. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00234

A. Wang , M. H. Thomas , & J. A Quellette . (1992). They keyword mnemonic and retention of second language vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 520528. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.520

R Waring . (1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A replication. System, 25, 261274. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00013-4

W. Wong , & D. O Pyun . (2012). The effects of sentence writing on second language French and Korean lexical retention. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 68, 164189. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.68.2.164

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 95 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 551 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 13th July 2017 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.