Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T10:28:33.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structure of intonational meaning: evidence form english

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Craige Roberts
Craige Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts at Amherst*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , Spring 1982 , pp. 211 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, K. O. 1979. Applied prosodic analysis: A pedagogical model for English and German intonation. Current issues in the phonetic sciences, ed. by Hollien, H. and Hollien, P., 227–234. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series IV, Volume 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Part I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bing, J. M. 1979. Aspects of English prosody. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Massachusetts. Amherst.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1951. Intonation: Levels versus configurations. Word 7. 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (ed.) 1972. Intonation. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. 1932. A preliminary study of English intonation (with American variants) and its Chinese equivalents (T'sai Yüan Pei Anniversary Volume, Supplementary Volume I of Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology of the Academica Sinica), Peiping.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 1969. Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gunter, R. 1972. Intonation and relevance. In Bolinger (1972:194–215).Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. 1955. A manual of phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics, no. 11.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, R. 1958. The groundwork of English intonation. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. 1978. The international system of English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. M.I.T. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Liberman, M., and Prince, A.. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8.249–336.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J.D., and Arnold, G. F.. 1961. Intonation of colloquial English. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. 1922. English intonation, with systematic exercises. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. M.I.T. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. 1945. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schubiger, M. 1958. English intonation: Its form and function. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Trager, G. L., and Smith, H. L.. 1951. Outline of English structure. Norman, Okla.: Battenburg Press. (Revised edition 1957, Washington: American Council of Learned Societies.)Google Scholar