This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
H. Aguinis , C. A. Pierce , F. A. Bosco , & I. S Muslin . (2009). First decade of organizational research methods trends in design, measurement, and data-analysis topics. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 69–112.
A. W. Bangert , & J. P Baumberger . (2005). Research and statistical techniques used in the Journal of Counseling & Development. Journal of Counseling & Development ,83, 480–487.
S. Brutus , H. Gill , & K Duniewicz . (2010). State-of-science in industrial and organizational psychology: A review of self-reported limitations. Personnel Psychology, 63, 907–936.
L. H. Cashen , & S. W Geiger . (2004). Statistical power and the testing of null hypotheses: A review of contemporary management research and recommendations for future studies. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 151–167.
A.-W. Chan , A. Hróbjartsson , M. T. Haahr , P. C. Gøtzsche , & D. G Altman . (2004). Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 2457–2465.
C Chaudron . (1986). The interaction of quantitative and qualitative approaches to research: A view of the second language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 709–717.
C Chaudron . (2001). Progress in language classroom research: Evidence from The Modern Language Journal, 1916–2000. Modern Language Journal, 85, 57–76.
J Cohen . (1968). Multiple regression as a general data-analytic system. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 426–443.
J Cohen . (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 97–1003.
G Crookes . (1991). Power, effect size, and second language research: Another researcher comments. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 762–765.
R. DeKeyser , & R Schoonen . (2007). Editors’ announcement. Language Learning, 57, ix–x.
T. A DeVaney . (2001). Statistical significance, effect size, and replication: What do the journals say? The Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 310–320.
T. H Dinsmore . (2006). Principles, parameters, and SLA: A retrospective meta-analytic investigation into adult L2 learners’ access to Universal Grammar. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 53–90). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
S. H. Downs , & N Black . (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and nonrandomized studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 52, 377–384.
J Egbert . (2007). Quality analysis of journals in TESOL and applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 157–171.
J. L Fleiss . (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378–382.
S. Gass , C. Fleck , N. Leder , & I Svetics . (1998). Ahistoricity revisited: Does SLA have a history? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 407–421.
S. M Gass . (1993). Second language acquisition: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. Second Language Research, 9, 95–98.
A. Gelman , J. Hill , & M Yajima . (2012). Why we (usually) don’t have to worry about multiple comparisons. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5, 189–211.
A. Gelman , & D Weakliem . (2009). Of beauty, sex and power: Too little attention has been paid to the statistical challenges in estimating small effects. American Scientist, 97, 310–316.
L. D. Goodwin , & W. L Goodwin . (1985). An analysis of statistical techniques used in the Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979–1983. Educational Psychologist, 20, 13–21.
E Hatch . (1978). Apply with caution. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 123–143.
G Henning . (1986). Quantitative methods in language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 701–708.
L. G Humphreys . (1978). Doing research the hard way: Substituting analysis of variance for a problem in correlational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 873–876.
Journal Article Reporting Standards Working Group. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63, 839–851.
H. J. Keselman , C. J. Huberty , L. M. Lix , S. Olejnik , R. A. Cribbie , B. Donahue , . . . J. R Levin . (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68, 350–386.
K. M. Kieffer , R. J. Reese , & B Thompson . (2001). Statistical techniques employed in AERJ and JCP articles from 1988 to 1997: A methodological review. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 280–309.
M Kubanyiova . (2008). Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. Modern Language Journal, 92, 503–518.
J. R. Landis , & G. G Koch . (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
J. Larson-Hall , & R Herrington . (2010). Improving data analysis in second language acquisition by utilizing modern developments in applied statistics. Applied Linguistics, 31, 368–190.
A Lazaraton . (1991). Power, effect size, and second language research: A researcher comments. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 759–762.
A Lazaraton . (2000). Current trends in research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 175–181.
A. Lazaraton , H. Riggenbach , & A Ediger . (1987). Forming a discipline: Applied linguists’ literacy in research methodology and statistics. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 263–277.
S Li . (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.
P. M Lightbown . (2000). Anniversary article: Classroom second language research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21, 431–462.
S Loewen . (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361–386.
D. E Lykken . (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159.
R. Lyster , & J Izquierdo . (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59, 453–498.
A. Mackey , & S. M Gass . (Eds.). (2012). Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
S. S Magnan . (1994). From the editor: The MLJ tradition and the challenges ahead. Modern Language Journal, 78, 7–9.
M. S. Matthews , M. Gentry , D. B. McCoach , F. C. Worrell , D. Matthews , & F Dixon . (2008). Evaluating the state of a field: Effect size reporting in gifted education. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 55–65.
S. T. Meier , & S. R Davis . (1990). Trends in reporting psychometric properties of scales used in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 113–115.
M. A. Mone , G. C. Mueller , & W Mauland . (1996). The perceptions and usage of statistical power in applied psychology and management research. Personnel Psychology, 49, 103–120.
E. Nicoladis , & A Krott . (2007). Word family size and French-speaking children’s segmentation of existing compounds. Language Learning, 57, 201–228.
J. M. Norris , & L Ortega . (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
L Ortega . (2005). Methodology, epistemology, and ethics in instructed SLA research: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 89, 317–327.
T Pica . (1997). Second language teaching and research relationships: A North American view. Language Teaching Research, 1, 48–72.
L Plonsky . (2011a). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61, 993–1038.
L. Plonsky , & S Gass . (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61, 325–366.
L. Plonsky , & F. L Oswald . (2012). How to do a meta-analysis. In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 275–295). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
C Polio . (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47, 101–143.
G Porte . (2010) Appraising research in second language learning: A practical approach to critical analysis of quantitative research (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
D Pulido . (2004). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: A matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning, 54, 469–523.
F. L Schmidt . (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115–129.
P. Sedlmeier , & G Gigerenzer . (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309–316.
L. Selinker , & U Lakshmanan . (2001). How do we know what we know? Why do we believe what we believe? Second Language Research, 17, 323–325.
S. T. Skidmore , & B Thompson . (2010). Statistical techniques used in published articles: A historical review of reviews. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 777–795.
B. Smith , & B. A Lafford . (2009). The evaluation of scholarly activity in computer-assisted language learning. Modern Language Journal, 93, 868–883.
S. Sun , W. Pan , & L. L Wang . (2010). A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 989–1004.
B Thompson . (2001). Significance, effect sizes, stepwise methods, and other issues: Strong arguments move the field. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 80–93.
B. Thompson , & P. A Snyder . (1998). Statistical significance and reliability analyses in recent JCD research articles. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 436–441.
T. Vacha-Haase , C. Ness , J. Nilsson , & D Reetz . (1999). Practices regarding reporting of reliability coefficients: A review of three journals. The Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 335–341.
T. Vacha-Haase , & B Thompson . (2004). How to estimate and interpret various effect sizes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 473–481.
A Valdman . (1998). A note from the editor: 20th anniversary of SSLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 463–470.
J. C. Valentine , & H Cooper . (2008). A systematic and transparent approach for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research: The study design and implementation assessment device (Study DIAD). Psychological Methods, 13, 130–149.
H. Z Waring . (2009). Moving out of IRF (initiation-response-feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59, 796–824.
C. S. Wells , & J. M Hintze . (2007). Dealing with assumptions underlying statistical tests. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 495–502.
K. Wells , & J. H Littell . (2009). Study quality assessment in systematic reviews of research on intervention effects. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 52–62.
L. Wilkinson , & Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.
V. L Willson . (1980). Research techniques in AERJ articles: 1969 to 1978. Educational Researcher, 9, 5–10.