Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T06:18:10.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching for Communicative Competence: Reality and Illusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Alan Maley
Alan Maley
Affiliation:
The British Council, Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A communicative approach to language learning necessarily entails a commitment to reality. While it is quite possible to teach language as a system in a completely self-contained way, once we begin to try to teach language for use we are inevitably involved in the complexity of human interaction. We focus not on what learners know about the language system but on what they can do with it in the real world beyond the classroom.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , Fall 1980 , pp. 10 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbs, B. et al. , 1977. Strategies. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Alexander, L.G. et al. 1975. English Grammatical Structure. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Andrews, J. 1975. Say What You Mean in English. Sunbury-on-Thames: Nelson.Google Scholar
Atkinson, P. 1980. “Ethnomethodology and Foreign Language Learning.” In Fremdsprachenunterricht zwischen Gesellschaft, Schule und Wissenschaften. Proceedings of a conference sponsored by the Goethe Institute, Paris, and the British Council, Paris. Munich: Goethe Institute.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C.J. 1979. “Notional Syllabuses – A Reassessment.” System, 7, No. 2, 111–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S.P. 1979. Report on Workshop on Language Acquisition. Paris: British Council.Google Scholar
Dard, F. [San Antonio]. 1978. Tire m'en deux: c'est pour rire. Paris: Editions fleuve noir.Google Scholar
Dobson, J.M. 1979. “The Notional Syllabus: Theory and Practice in Language Teaching.” Forum, 17, No. 2.Google Scholar
van Ek, J.A. 1972. The Threshold Level. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Enkvist, N.E. 1980. “Textlinguistics and Foreign Language Learning.” In Fremdsprachenunterricht zwischen Gesellschaft, Schule und Wissenschaften. Munich: Goethe Institute.Google Scholar
Fish, H. Forthcoming. “Graded Activities and Authentic Material.” In The Teaching of Listening Skills, English Teaching and Information Center (ETIC). London: British Council.Google Scholar
Frank, C. and Rinvolucri, M.. Awareness Activities. Canterbury: Pilgrims Publications.Google Scholar
Goethe Institute. 1977. Rollenspiel und Simulation. Munich: Goethe Institute.Google Scholar
Jones, L. 1977. Functions of English: a course for advanced students, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.D. 1977. “The Monitor Model for Adult Second Language Performance.” In Viewpoints on English as a Second Language, Burt, M., Dulay, H., and Finocchiaro, M., eds. New York: Regent Pub.Google Scholar
Lozanov, Georgi. 1978. Suggestology and Outlines of Suggestopedy. London: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Maley, A., and Duff, A.. 1978. Variations on a Theme. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Maley, A., and Duff, A.. 1978a. Drama Techniques in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Maley, A., and Duff, A., and Grellet, F.. 1980. The Mind's Eye. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Maley, A., and Duff, A., and Grellet, F.. 1980a. Mind Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Munby, G.L. 1978. Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Naiman, N., Frolich, M., Stern, H.H., and Todesco, A.. 1978. The Good Language Learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Pickett, D. 1978. The Foreign Language Learning Process. ETIC Occasional Paper. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Pote, M. et al. , 1979. A Case for English. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Stevick, E. 1976. Memory, Meaning and Method. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D.A. 1976. Notional Syllabuses: a taxonomy and its relevance to foreign language curririculum development. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar