Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T20:16:38.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Treatment of Foreground-Background Information in the On-Line Descriptive Discourse of Second Language Learners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Russell S. Tomlin
Russell S. Tomlin
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper compares the foregrounding strategies of native speakers of English and advanced learners of ESL. Fifteen native speakers and thirty-five advanced learners produced on-line (play-by-play) descriptions of the unfolding action in an animated videotape. A methodology for the quantitative analysis of discourse production is described which permits the explicit identification of foreground-background information and its interaction with both native speaker and interlanguage syntaxes. Results show that: (1) Native speakers and learners exhibit one universal discourse strategy in retreating to a more pragmatic mode of communication under the severe communicative stress of on-line description, as revealed through the systematic loss of the coding relations ordinarily holding between foreground-background information and clause independence/tense-aspect; (2) Learners also exhibit a learner-specific general communication strategy in which significant events are described but nonsignificant events avoided.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Spring 1984 , pp. 115 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, J. 1980. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. and Bower, G. 1973. Human Associative Memory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Berenson, M.L.; Levine, D.; and Goldstein, M. 1983. Intermediate Statistical Methods and Applications: A Computer Package. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.L. 1979. The flow of thought and the flow of language. Discourse and Syntax: Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12, pp. 159–182. ed. Givon, T.. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.L. ed. 1980. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
Dixon, W.J., ed. 1981. BMDP Statistical Software. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Givon, T. 1979. From discourse to syntax; grammar as a processing strategy. Discourse and Syntax: Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12, pp. 81–114. ed. Givon, T.. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. Discourse and Syntax: Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12, pp. 213–242. ed. Givon, T.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, L. and Jones, L. 1979. Multiple levels of information in discourse. Discourse Studies in Mesoamerican Languages: Discussion, pp. 3–28. ed. Jones, L.. Arlington, Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. 1974. The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. and van Dijk, T. 1978. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85: 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longacre, R.L. 1976. The discourse structure of the flood narrative. Society of Biblical Literature: 1976 Seminar Papers, pp. 235–262. ed. MacRae, G.. Missoula, Montana: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Monaco, J. 1981. How to Read a Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newtson, D. 1973. Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28: 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newtson, D. and Engquist, G. 1976. The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 12: 436–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newtson, D.; Engquist, G.; and Bois, J. 1977. The objective basis of behavior units. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35: 847–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. 1979. Planned and unplanned discourse. Discourse and Syntax: Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12, pp. 51–80. ed. Givon, T.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reisz, K. 1976. The Technique of Film Editing. 2nd ed.New York: Hastings House.Google Scholar
Reynolds, H.T. 1977. The Analysis of Cross-Classifications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W. and Scarcella, R. 1983. Language Universals and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. 1981. Some thoughts on the notion communication strategy. TESOL Quarterly, 15: 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R.S. 1981. Clause-level syntax and information types in EST discourse. Paper presented at Teaching Scientific and Technical English to Non-Native Speakers II. Department of Humanities, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Tomiin, R.S. 1983. The identification of foreground-background information in on-line descriptive discourse, (ms) Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Winer, B.J. 1972. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar