Skip to main content
×
×
Home

THE USE OF NATIVE SPEAKER NORMS IN CRITICAL PERIOD HYPOTHESIS RESEARCH

  • Sible Andringa (a1)
Abstract

In critical period hypothesis (CPH) research, native speaker (NS) norm groups have often been used to determine whether nonnative speakers (NNSs) were able to score within the NS range of scores. One goal of this article is to investigate what NS samples were used in previous CPH research. The literature review shows that NS control groups tend to be small and highly educated and that detailed background information is usually not provided. Another goal of this article is to investigate how the NS norm group may affect the incidence of nativelike performance by NNSs. To this end, 124 NSs and 118 NNSs of Dutch completed five comprehension tasks and a vocabulary task. On the basis of mean scores and standard deviations, norms were determined for a representative and a nonrepresentative (highly educated) subsample of NSs. Also, separate norms were constructed for the high- and low-frequency items within a task. Exact McNemar tests were used to establish that the incidence of nativelike performance by NNSs was significantly higher if a representative sample norm was used. The results also showed that, insofar as there were effects of frequency, norms based on low-frequency test items tended to be more inclusive. The results imply that the selection of NSs in CPH research deserves more consideration than it has received in the past; they also suggest that NS ceiling performance is potentially useful in determining nativelike performance.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sible Andringa, Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail: S.J.Andringa@uva.nl
References
Hide All
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249306.
Andringa, S. J., Olsthoorn, N. M., Van Beuningen, C. G., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Determinants of success in native and nonnative listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62(s2), 2848.
Asher, J., & García, G. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 38, 334341.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Philadelphia.
Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 417432). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bialystok, E., & Miller, B. (1999). The problem of age in second language acquisition: Influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 127145.
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706756.
Birdsong, D. (2005). Nativelikeness and nonnativelikeness in L2A research. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 319328.
Birdsong, D. (2007). Nativelike pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language. In Bohn, O. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 99116). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235249.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. M. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 4168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S., & Van der Slik, F. (2000). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica, 54, 298308.
Bongaerts, T., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1995). Can late learners attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. In Singleton, D. & Lengyel, Z. (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 3050). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Bongaerts, T., Van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447465.
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2011). Statline databank [Online database]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cbs.nl
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of theory and syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Colantoni, L., & Steele, J. (2006). Native-like attainment in the L2 acquisition of Spanish stop-liquid clusters. In Klee, C. A. & Face, T. L. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 5973). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Cook, V. J. (2002). Background to the L2 user. In Cook, V. J. (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 128). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 63, 544573.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coussé, E., Gillis, S., & Kloots, H. (2007). Verkort, verdoft, verdwenen: Vocaalreductie in het Corpus Gesproken Nederlands [Shortened, reduced, disappeared: Vocal reduction in the Corpus of Spoken Dutch]. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 12, 109138.
Dąbrowska, E. (1997). The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 35, 735766.
Dąbrowska, E. (2008). The later development of an early-emerging system: The curious case of the Polish genitive. Linguistics, 46, 629650.
Dąbrowska, E. (2012). Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 219253.
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28, 604615.
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499533.
DeKeyser, R. (2012). Age effects in second language learning. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 442460). New York: Routledge.
DeKeyser, R. (2013). Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning, 63(s1), 5267.
Ernestus, M. T. C. (2000). Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch: A corpus-based study of the phonology-phonetics interface (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht, the Netherlands: LOT.
Eubank, L., & Gregg, K. R. (1999). Critical periods and (second) language acquisition: Divide et impera. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 6599). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164203.
Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Anes, M. D., Weeks, P. A., & McFarlane, D. K. (1996). Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken-language processing: Evidence from the auditory moving-window technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 324335.
Flege, J. E., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Tsukada, K. (2006). Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 153175.
Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527552.
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 31253134.
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78104.
Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 23, 311343.
Gregg, K. R. (1996). The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 4981). San Diego: Academic Press.
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131149.
Guion, S. (2003). The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second languages. Phonetica, 60, 98128.
Guion, S., Harada, T., & Clark, J. J. (2004). Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 207226.
Hazenberg, S., & Hulstijn, J. H. (1996). Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for nonnative university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17, 145163.
Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 229249.
Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 422433.
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539588). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 7398.
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 6099.
Kloots, H., De Schutter, G., Gillis, S., & Swerts, M. (2003). Vocaalreductie in spontaan gesproken Standaardnederlands: Een verkennende studie [Vocal reduction in spontaneously spoken standard Dutch: An exploratory study]. In Koole, T., Nortier, J., & Tahitu, B. (Eds.), Artikelen van de vierde sociolinguistische conferentie (pp. 224233). Delft: Eburon.
Lee, B., Guion, S., & Harada, T. (2006). Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 487513.
Lee, D., & Schachter, J. (1997). Sensitive period effects in binding theory. Language Acquisition, 6, 333362.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251285.
Long, M. H. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 287317.
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 1641). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDonald, J. L. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395423.
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanation for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381401.
Montrul, S. A. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Montrul, S. A., & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351398.
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81108.
Muñoz, C. (2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 29, 578596.
Munro, M. J., & Mann, V. (2005). Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 311341.
Neufeld, G. (1988). Phonological asymmetry in second-language learning and performance. Language Learning, 4, 531559.
Neufeld, G. (2001). Non-foreign-accented speech in adult second language learners: Does it exist and what does it signify? ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 133–134, 185206.
Olsthoorn, N. M., Andringa, S. J., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Visual and auditory digit-span performance in native and nonnative speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1367006912466314
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261285.
Patkowski, M. S. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449472.
Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E. (2010). More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua, 120, 20802094.
Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Flege, J. E. (2005). A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics, 33, 263290.
Van Boxtel, S., Bongaerts, T., & Coppen, P. (2005). Native-like attainment of dummy subjects in Dutch and the role of the L1. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 355380.
White, L., & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 238265.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 33
Total number of PDF views: 476 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1162 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.