Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-8ls8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-13T19:01:33.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monopsony power and the demand for low-skilled workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Arnd Kölling Open the ORCID record for Arnd Kölling [Opens in a new window]
Arnd Kölling*
Affiliation:
Berlin School of Economics and Law, Germany
*
Arnd Kölling, Hocschule für Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin, Alt-Friedrichsfelde 60, D-10315 Berlin, Germany. Email: arnd.koelling@hwr-berlin.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study analyses firms’ labour demand when employers have at least some monopsony power. It is argued that without taking into account (quasi-)monopsonistic structures of the labour market, wrong predictions are made about the effects of minimum wages. Using switching fractional panel probit regressions with German establishment data, I find that slightly more than 80% of establishments exercise some degree of monopsony power in their demand for low-skilled workers. The outcome suggests that a 1% increase in payments for low-skilled workers would, in these firms, increase employment for this group by 1.12%, while firms without monopsony power reduce the number of low-skilled, by about 1.63% for the same increase in remuneration. The study can probably also be used to explain the limited employment effects of the introduction of a statutory minimum wage in Germany and thus leads to a better understanding of the labour market for low-skilled workers.

Keywords

Monopsonylabour demandlow-skilled workerslow wagesJ23J42C23D24

Information

Type
Industry, skills and investment
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 377 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Addison, JT, Bellmann, L, Schank, T, et al. (2008) The demand for labour: An analysis using matched employer–employee data from the German LIAB. Will the high unskilled worker own-wage elasticity please stand up? Journal of Labour Research 29(2): 114–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azar, J, Marinescu, I, Steinbaum, M, et al. (2020) Concentration in US labour markets: Evidence from online vacancy data. Labour Economics 66: 101886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belman, D, Wolfson, P (2014) What does the minimum wage do? Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benmelech, E, Bergman, N, Kim, H (2018) Strong employers and weak employees: How does employer concentration affect wages? NBER Working Paper No. w24307 Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, DW, Herkenhoff, KF, Mongey, S (2019) Labour Market Power. NBER Working Paper No. w25719. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boal, WM, Ransom, MR (1997) Monopsony in the labour market. Journal of Economic Literature 35(1): 86–112.Google Scholar
Bonin, H, Isphording, IE, Annabelle, KP, et al. (2019) The German statutory minimum wage and its effects on regional employment and unemployment. IZA Policy Paper No. 145. Bonn: Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).Google Scholar
Bossler, M, Gerner, HD (2020) Employment effects of the new German minimum wage. Evidence from establishment-level micro data. ILR Review 73(5): 1070–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenzel, H, Czepek, J, Kubis, A, et al. (2016) Neueinstellungen im Jahr 2015: Stellen werden häufig über persönliche Kontakte besetzt. IAB-Kurzbericht 4/2016. Nuremberg: Institute of Employment Research (IAB).Google Scholar
Bruttel, O (2019) The effects of the new statutory minimum wage in Germany: A first assessment of the evidence. Journal for Labour Market Research 53: 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caliendo, M, Fedorets, A, Preuss, M, et al. (2018) The short-run employment effects of the German minimum wage reform. Labour Economics 53: 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, D, Heining, J, Kline, P (2015) CHK effects. FDZ Methodenreport No. 06/2015. Nuremberg, Germany: Research Data Centre (FDZ), Institute of Employment Research (IAB).Google Scholar
Card, D, Krueger, A (1994) Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the New Jersey and Pennsylvania fast food industries. American Economic Review 84(4): 772–793.Google Scholar
Card, D, Krueger, AB (1995) Myth and Measurement. New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G (1982) Multivariate regression models for panel data. Journal of Econometrics 18(1): 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chletsos, M, Giotis, GP (2015) The employment effect of minimum wage using 77 international studies since 1992: A meta-analysis. MPRA Paper No. 61321. Munich, Germany: Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA). Google Scholar
de Linde Leonard, M, Stanley, TD, Doucouliagos, H (2014) Does the UK minimum wage reduce employment? A meta‐regression analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations 52(3): 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depew, B, Soerensen, TA (2013) The elasticity of labour supply to the firm over the business cycle. Labour Economics 24: 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dube, A, Jacobs, J, Naidu, S, et al. (2018) Monopsony in online labour markets. NBER Working Paper No. w24416. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, J, Schmucker, A (2017) The establishment history panel–redesign and update 2016. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 237(6): 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falch, T (2017) Wages and recruitment: Evidence from external wage changes. ILR Review 70(2): 483–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G, Janik, F, Müller, D, et al (2008) The IAB Establishment Panel – From sample to survey to projection. FDZ Methodenreport No. 01/2008. Nuremberg, Germany: Research Data Centre (FDZ), Institute of Employment Research (IAB).Google Scholar
Fischer, G, Janik, F, Müller, D, et al. (2009) The IAB Establishment panel–things users should know. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies 129(1): 133–148.Google Scholar
Garloff, A (2019) Did the German minimum wage reform influence (un) employment growth in 2015? Evidence from regional data. German Economic Review 20(3): 356–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner, M, Taylor, J, Pankowska, P, et al. (2017) The impact of the national minimum wage on employment: a meta-analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamermesh, DS (1993) Labour Demand. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Herr, H, Herzog-Stein, A, Kromphardt, J, et al. (2017) Mindestlohns aus keynesianisch geprägter Perspektive. Studie im Auftrag der Mindestlohnkommission. Düsseldorf, Germany: Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK).Google Scholar
Herzog-Stein, A, Lübker, M, Pusch, T, et al. (2020) Fünf jahre mindestlohn-erfahrungen und perspektiven: Gemeinsame stellungnahme von IMK und WSI anlässlich der schriftlichen anhörung der mindestlohnkommission 2020. WSI Policy Brief No, 42. Düsseldorf, Germany: Institute of Economic and Social Research Google Scholar
Heise, A (2020) Minimum wages and the resilience of neoclassical labour market economics: Some preliminary evidence from Germany. Hamburg: ZÖSS Discussion Paper, 77. Hamburg, Germany: Center for Economic and Sociological Studies (ZÖSS) Google Scholar
Heise, A, Pusch, T (2020) Introducing minimum wages in Germany employment effects in a post Keynesian perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 30(5): 1515–1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershbein, B, Macaluso, C, Yeh, C (2019) Monopsony and concentration in the labour market: Evidence from vacancy and employment data. Paper presented at the NBER Summer Institute 2019 – Conference on Research in Income and Wealth. https://conference.nber.org/conf_papers/f122998.pdf (accessed July 15th, 2021).Google Scholar
Hirsch, B, Jahn, EJ (2015) Is there monopsonistic discrimination against immigrants? ILR Review 68(3): 501–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, B, Jahn, EJ, Schnabel, C (2018) Do employers have more monopsony power in slack labour markets? ILR Review 71(3): 676–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarosch, G, Nimczik, JS, Sorkin, I (2019) Granular search, market structure, and wages. NBER Working Paper No. w26239. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, YC, McFarlane, A, Das, A (2020) The effect of minimum wages on consumption in Canada. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304620949950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knabe, A, Schöb, E (2009) Minimum wage incidence: The case for Germany. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis 64(4): 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knabe, A, Schöb, R, Thum, M (2014) Der flächendeckende mindestlohn. Perspektiven der wirtschaftspolitik, 15(2): 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kölling, A (2012) Firm size and employment dynamics: Estimations of labour demand elasticities using a fractional panel probit model. Labour 26(2): 174–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kölling, A (2020) The statutory minimum wage in Germany and the labor demand elasticities of low-skilled workers: A regression discontinuity approach with establishment panel data. GLO Discussion Paper No. 687. Global Labor Organization (GLO).Google Scholar
Lichter, A, Peichl, A, Siegloch, S (2015) The own-wage elasticity of labour demand: A meta-regression analysis. European Economic Review 80: 94–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukiyanova, A, Vishnevskaya, N (2016) Decentralisation of the minimum wage setting in Russia: Causes and consequences. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 27(1): 98–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, A (2003) Monopsony in motion: Imperfect competition in labour markets. Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, A (2006) A generalised model of monopsony. The Economic Journal, 116(508): 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, A (2011) Imperfect competition in the labour market. In: Handbook of Labour Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 973–1041. San Diego, California: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Manning, A (2021) Monopsony in labour markets: A review. ILR Review. 74(1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez, F, Sepúlveda, F (2019) Monopsony power in occupational labour markets. Journal of Labour Research 40(4): 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundlak, Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46(1): 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumark, D, Wascher, W (1994) Minimum wage effects and low-wage labour markets: A disequilibrium approach. NBER Working Paper No. w4617. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumark, D, Salas, JI, Wascher, W (2014) More on recent evidence on the effects of minimum wages in the United States. IZA Journal of Labour Policy 3(1): 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papke, LE, Wooldridge, JM (2008) Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics 145(1–2): 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, DA (2016) Firm‐level monopsony and the gender pay gap. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 55(2): 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, JM (2015) Control function methods in applied econometrics. Journal of Human Resources 50(2): 420–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, JM (2019) Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels. Journal of Econometrics 211(1): 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kölling supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 894.9 KB