Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T05:12:13.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Class, labour conflict, and workers’ organisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Jenny Chan*
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is part of an internationally coordinated themed collection on ‘labour conflict, forms of organisation, and class’ exploring important questions. How can we explain the interplay of capital, the state, and the international order, in defining the persistence of labour conflict in changing historical and political-economic contexts? How have the economic, social, and technological transformations precipitated by the recent pandemic shaped the expression of work-related conflict? As part of a response to these main questions, the author and contributors of this collection conceptualise labour conflict and collective action in broader class analysis and examine the combined effect of state policies, migration, and digital innovation on contemporary labour politics. This article, drawing on insights from Marxist-oriented interdisciplinary approaches and feminist theories, seeks to suggest approaches to future studies on class, labour conflict, and workers’ organisation.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of UNSW Canberra

Introduction

Labour conflict is one of the most visible and persistent expressions of societies’ responses to inequality generated in capitalism and patriarchy. Whether we consider labour conflict as the direct outcome of oppressive conditions of work and forms of value extraction, or as part of popular upheavals against the precarisation of work and life, an understanding of the nature of labour conflict and its evolution at the heart of capitalism’s compass is important to analyse socio-political change. In light of the diversity of work and employment conditions, the specific locations of labourers within the production system, and familial dynamics, researchers have sought to explain workers’ resistance and acquiescence, organising strategies, and the outcomes (Burawoy Reference Burawoy1985; Marx Reference Marx and Fowkes1990 [1867]; Peck Reference Peck2023; Taylor & Rioux Reference Taylor and Rioux2018; Wright Reference Wright2005).

Trade unions have historically represented workers in workplaces and at the political level. However, the informalisation of labour and processes of labour market fragmentation associated with global migration flows have profoundly reconfigured the composition of working classes (Agarwala Reference Agarwala2022; Alberti & Però Reference Alberti and Però2018; Boris et al Reference Boris, Gottfried, Greene and Tham2023; Kalleberg Reference Kalleberg2009; Kalleberg & Vallas Reference Kalleberg and Vallas2018; Ness Reference Ness2023). The radical left and reform-minded policymakers have pushed trade unions to be more responsive to migrants and various groups of informal workers. Moreover, activist-oriented analysts have provided novel analytical perspectives to fully grasp the diverse ways of grassroots labour organising that have emerged at critical junctures (Atzeni Reference Atzeni2014, Reference Atzeni2021, Reference Atzeni, Piva and Santella2022; Gutierrez Crocco & Atzeni Reference Gutierrez Crocco and Atzeni2022). Notwithstanding formidable challenges, workers, employers, and government representatives have engaged in negotiations to attempt to resolve production and overproduction crises (Atzeni Reference Atzeni2010; Nowak Reference Nowak2019).

Revitalised trade unions have strengthened leadership and collaboration with autonomous workers’ groups in achieving more inclusive, adequate, and effective labour protection for all workers (Ford Reference Ford2009, Reference Ford2019; Forsyth Reference Forsyth2022; Hermanson Reference Hermanson2023; MacDonald Reference MacDonald, Atzeni and Ness2018; Milkman & Voss Reference Milkman and Voss2004; Rhomberg & Lopez Reference Rhomberg and Lopez2021; Webster et al Reference Webster, Lambert and Bezuidenhout2008). This article highlights the centrality of class analysis in understanding the logic and limits of workers’ power and collective action. It considers unions and other forms of workers’ organisation in crafting new frontiers in the fight for empowerment of labour. The next section delves into the pivotal role played by the state in facilitating capitalist accumulation and limiting labour forces on the one hand, but in some instances in alleviating workers’ economic stress through establishing a social security system that boosts its legitimacy on the other hand. Then, the third section examines migration, informal work, and the relations of production and social reproduction. The fourth section explores the consequences for labour of the growth of the platform economy, digitalised control, and worker resistance. With reference to workers’ agency and collective mobilisation, the fifth section analyses the self-organisation of labouring classes. Here, the contributing authors of this themed collection vividly document gig workers’ and migrant labourers’ unionisation efforts, strikes, and protests, while assessing the responses and powers of capital and the state.Footnote 1 The conclusion reflects on the normative foundations of a class analysis of the new world of labour.

Class, the state, and labour regimes

The economic liberalisation of the past half-century has vastly changed the nature of jobs and employment relations. As companies seek to increase profitability by employing less expensive workforces or relying on the availability of women, immigrants, and much of the rural population to reduce wages, it is tempting to envision the expansion of informal employment as merely an outcome of the labour-capital battle. But we must also consider the state’s regulatory role in facilitating informalisation (Agarwala Reference Agarwala2013; Anner Reference Anner2011; Fürst et al Reference Fürst, Pons and Selden2017; Hung Reference Hung2009; Kalleberg et al Reference Kalleberg, Hewison and Shin2022; Solinger Reference Solinger2009). State-initiated labour and migrant policies often determine how workers are hired with different terms and conditions, and how some find themselves excluded from formal, government-sponsored grievance mechanisms and welfare provisions (Kuruvilla et al Reference Kuruvilla, Lee and Gallagher2011). Through legislation and policy implementation, state officials are deeply involved in defining the logic and limits of informalisation.

Under the auspices of the state, when developing countries increasingly opened to foreign investment, newly found factory and service jobs were mostly concentrated in low value-added segments of globalised production. ‘A labour regime’, in the words of Baglioni et al (Reference Baglioni, Campling, Coe and Smith2022, 1), ‘signals the combination of social relations and institutions that bind capital and labour in a form of antagonistic relative stability in particular times and places’. Lead firms retain core competence such as research and development, branding and marketing, while contracting suppliers and subcontractors to assemble products at the lowest possible cost. The use of ‘flexible’ labour to meet the boom-and-bust production cycles is frequent. Fundamentally, capitalism is a dynamic system of exploitation.

Immense wealth and massive poverty coexist amid capitalist expansion around the globe. The assumption of economic and social growth through global (re)integration as widely shared by national governments, businesses, and transnational institutions such as the World Bank have not gone unchallenged. Indeed, the pathways to attracting foreign capital and further opening of domestic markets with access to land and workers have been highly controversial (Selwyn Reference Selwyn2017). At the point of production, young female migrants and other less-protected workers are among those drawn into labour-intensive and capital-intensive industries. This proletarianisation process has often been promoted by state-guided industrialisation, migration, and urbanisation strategies (Chan Reference Chan and Roth2018, Reference Chan and Ovetz2021). Hundreds of millions of peasants and rural labourers are on the move, oftentimes leaving behind their children and the elderly.

Looking closer, the state and employers frequently use the formal/informal distinction to justify not enrolling workers in state-administered social security, such as pensions, healthcare benefits, and insurance against accidents and diseases (Kalleberg et al Reference Kalleberg, Hewison and Shin2022). ‘Transient’ migrants, internal or international, are often classified as inferior, second-class citizens, whose access to public education, housing, and healthcare in the cities are constrained or denied (Friedman Reference Friedman2022). While migrant workers can exercise ‘mobility power’ to bring some benefits, such as using transnational differences in employment conditions and the scarcity of local labour in specific sectors for advancement, many simultaneously confront inequalities at and beyond the workplace, which are perpetuated by the collusion between capital and the state (Anderson Reference Anderson, Horton and Heyman2020). The threshold of government subsidies for the needy, if any at all, is often far from sufficient for subsistence. With low income and insecure jobs, the most vulnerable may lose their ability to marry and care for children, thus exacerbating the social reproduction crisis (Fraser Reference Fraser2016; Kalleberg et al Reference Kalleberg, Hewison and Shin2022; Selwyn Reference Selwyn2017; Standing Reference Standing2011).

In the face of large-scale protests initiated by workers and other oppressed social groups, however, some concessions are often made. Minimum wages — rarely living wages — are promulgated in specified jurisdictions. As wages are low and benefits few, many workers need to do massive amounts of overtime, thereby destabilising social and family lives. The sacrifice of opportunities for parenting, even when children have migrated with their parents, are shared experience among migrant families (Chan Reference Chan2023; Friedman Reference Friedman2022). Worse yet, trade unions are frequently barred by both employers and the state. In China, for example, critical labour scholars and activist workers have long questioned the legitimacy of the All-China Federation of Trade Unions’ exercise of monopolistic power and its capacity of representing workers across different levels (Chen Reference Chen2009; Friedman Reference Friedman2014; Gallagher Reference Gallagher2017; Pringle Reference Pringle2011).

Precarious work is becoming more pervasive. Although cross-national comparisons are complicated by different definitions of formal/informal employment, it is evident that non-regular workers, such as part-time, dispatch, and non-contract workers, have risen globally (Breman et al Reference Breman, Harris, Lee and van der Linden2019; Standing Reference Standing2011). Labour services regulated by digital platforms, in particular, have been growing during the COVID-19 lockdowns of cities and countryside. But labour protections are insufficient, with contention between ‘social agendas (social protection, employment stability, and economic security)’ and ‘neoliberal agendas (competitiveness, investment, and growth)’ (Kalleberg et al Reference Kalleberg, Hewison and Shin2022, 147).

Capitalist accumulation, migration, and labour subjectivities

Capitalism reproduces and manipulates divisions and hostility inside the working class. Gender, racial/ethnic, and age differences, for example, have been institutionalised to create and perpetuate social hierarchies (Kim Reference Kim2013; Roediger Reference Roediger1991; Roediger & Esch Reference Roediger and Esch2012; Tilly & Tilly Reference Tilly and Tilly1998). Hegemonic masculinity refers to ‘the currently most honoured way of being a man’, requiring ‘all other men to position themselves in relation to it’ and ideologically legitimating ‘the global subordination of women to men’ (Connell & Messerschmidt Reference Connell and Messerschmidt2005, 832). Young women migrants wish to make money and enjoy personal freedom before getting married, thus sometimes tolerating the harsh conditions in the urban workplace. By contrast, male tech migrants have obtained a relatively higher social-economic status as white-collar workers and are more integrated into urban life with greater consumption power. Indeed, individual workers would experience very different degrees of managerial control and autonomy (Li Reference Li2022; Vallas & Hill Reference Vallas and Hill2018).

Class subjectivities and gender identities are socially constructed in the migration and labour processes. Employers frequently provide migrants with dormitory housing and basic social facilities to relieve them from taking care of daily reproductive activities, thereby increasing labour time and effort to achieve profitability and production goals (Chan et al Reference Chan, Selden and Pun2020; Goodburn & Mishra Reference Goodburn and Mishra2023). The boundary between ‘home’ and work is blurred. This spatial proximity helps meet just-in-time production deadlines by facilitating overtime work and lengthening the workday. Federici (Reference Federici2004) further stressed that primitive accumulation was not simply an accumulation and concentration of workers and capital, but an accumulation of differences and divisions within the working class, whereby hierarchies built on gender and ethnicity have become constitutive of class domination and the formation of the modern proletariat.

Importantly, Silver (Reference Silver2003, 24) in Forces of Labor, an innovative world-historical mapping of labour conflict, underlined how states, capital, and the working class produce specific strategies to create boundaries: ‘segmenting labour markets (pursued mainly by capital), bounding citizenship (pursued mainly by states), and constructing exclusionary class identities on non-class bases (pursued mainly by workers themselves)’. These boundaries highlight how crucial it is to consider the characteristics of the workforce and how these distinctions are deployed by different actors inside and out of the workplace. As McGrath and Strauss (Reference McGrath, Strauss and van der Pijl2015, 306) summarise, ‘capitalism necessarily entails making use of, reinforcing and/or producing these relations of “difference” in the construction of labour relations’.

Migrant informal workers are doubly trapped in informal employment relations and an unequal citizenship regime. Aggravated by the urban-biased development policy that has resulted in a great rural–urban disparity, the spheres of production (wage employment centred in the city) and social reproduction (childcare in the village) are spatially separated for many low-income rural migrants. While early discussions viewed informal work simply as an absence of formal employment arrangements, later studies explored the social composition and organisation of informal labour, as well as the interdependent relationship between informal and formal economic sectors (Castells & Portes Reference Castells, Portes, Portes, Castells and Benton1989; Chan et al Reference Chan, Nair and Rhomberg2019; Lee et al Reference Lee, Swider and Tilly2020). The evolution of labour relations in contemporary economies requires in-depth analysis. As discussed in the next section, the rise of algorithmic management of work and control of informal labourers has been in turn dependent on the growth of internet-based retail trade.

Technology-driven growth, platform economy, and the politics of labour

The movement of goods and services is ever more reliant on seamless, wireless internet connectivity and mobile applications. Tech conglomerates and their logistics departments are incentivised to manage couriers through service contracting rather than formal employment (Alimahomed-Wilson & Reese Reference Alimahomed-Wilson and Reese2020; Cowen Reference Cowen2014). In outsourcing, they do not provide ‘labour-service partners’ or independent contractors with employment contracts, minimum wages, or employee benefits. Indeed, normative expressions such as share, task, help, and service are now frequently used by businesses and governments as well, instead of more clearly defined terms such as work, job, and employee (Wu et al Reference Wu, Zhang, Li and Liu2019, 576). In this discourse, the relations of production are obscured. But workers are not simply ‘users of a digital medium’; they are incorporated into a capitalist system of production (Gandini Reference Gandini2019, 1041). Software applications allocate and evaluate work to improve cost effectiveness. In this sense, the replacement of a human manager by an ‘algorithmic boss’ does not lessen the degree of corporate control, despite corporate hype concerning the ‘independence’ of delivery workers that is used to justify their classification as contractors, not employees.

In myriad subcontracting relationships, ‘self-employed’ labourers are generally required to provide their own technological means of production at work, such as a smartphone and a motorbike (Rème-Harnay Reference Rème-Harnay2023). With variable orders and piece-rates, workers’ minimum earnings are not guaranteed. Moore and Newsome (Reference Moore and Newsome2018) point out that parcel delivery work should be redefined as ‘dependent self-employment’ because the companies exercise direct control over the job. Despite the designation ‘independent contractor’, questions persist as to how much independence couriers attached to digital platforms enjoy. What is certain is that the new economy is transforming employment relations beyond digital applications and their algorithms (della Porta et al Reference della Porta, Chesta and Cini2023; Kassem Reference Kassem2022).

Outside the state-defined employment relations framework, technological innovators have recruited workers through digital platforms to establish a worldwide system of on-demand labour services (Drahokoupil & Vandaele Reference Drahokoupil and Vandaele2021; Srnicek Reference Srnicek2017; Wood et al Reference Wood, Graham, Lehdonvirta and Hjorth2019; Zhang Reference Zhang2023). Online labour platforms of ride-hailing, food delivery, and parcel express delivery have created numerous part-time and full-time jobs across rural and urban spaces. In a span of a decade, digital labour platforms have grown exponentially from 142 in 2010 to 777 in 2020 globally (ILO 2021). Global tech conglomerates have been ‘successful’ not only by harnessing big data but also by leaping ahead of state regulation. Scholz (Reference Scholz2017, 13) argues that the design of a corporate-dominated, platform-mediated labour system is ‘instrumental in the process of dissolving direct employment, thereby creating low-wage futures for millions of people’. Indeed, companies seek to ‘capture profits through digital intermediation, thus avoiding the encumbrances that ownership of fixed capital or the direct employment of labour usually entails’ (Vallas & Schor Reference Vallas and Schor2020, 282).

The interaction of information technology, precarity, and labour relations has been much debated in the case of gig economy workers. Deadly road accidents involving delivery workers, labour strikes triggered by sharp pay cuts and speedups, and workers’ claims for compensation have increasingly challenged image-conscious tech firms. In assessing workers’ responses to precarious working conditions, their mutual support in everyday work is important (Tassinari & Maccarrone Reference Tassinari and Maccarrone2020). Rizzo and Atzeni (Reference Rizzo and Atzeni2020, 1121) contend that ‘the harshness of work and the need of mitigating its pernicious consequences’ often provide ‘grounds for the emergence of solidarity’. Platform corporations have drawn on pre-existing human relations such as marriage ties, kinship, and friendship into the sphere of production, thus reducing some costs of operation and supervision (Chan Reference Chan2023). Likewise, platform-based workers have built social groups to share tips on job searches, negotiations with private insurance companies, and access to cheap accommodation. In the labour process, parcel couriers, while working independently in diverse locations, have devised coping strategies to exchange or redistribute parcels among themselves to meet tight deadlines, just like food riders who transfer meal orders to alleviate stress when necessary (Sun & Chen Reference Sun and Chen2021).

The forging of on-line and off-line interpersonal networks can facilitate labour organising. Gig workers have been exploring a range of tactics such as the coordination of small-scale protests to demand higher pay, injury compensation, and fairer work schedules, based on a judgement that low-profile bargaining with management may be more effective than large-scale disruptions to traffic to get public attention (Liu & Friedman Reference Liu and Friedman2021). At other times, leveraging formal legal institutions, aggrieved workers have filed labour disputes across multiple industries covering food and parcel delivery, car-hailing, and other types of platform-mediated service work, while labour relations between the online platforms and gig workers remain somewhat ambiguous (Lei Reference Lei2021; Xiao Reference Xiao2019). Ultimately, suspension or deactivation of the troublemakers’ user accounts is characteristic of the ‘algorithmic panopticon’ (Woodcock Reference Woodcock2020, 88). Couriers’ mobilising tactics at geographic delivery stations and through internet connectivity, however, are stimulating inquiry into the possibilities and limitations of workers’ resistance.

Apart from the technological dimension, global venture capital has exerted its influence in high-tech sectors with the primary goals to maximise market value and profitability (Srnicek Reference Srnicek2017; Zhang Reference Zhang2023). In successive rounds of financing, platform giants have devised local labour acquisition strategies to ensure a greater market share and rapid business growth in the long run. Under the direct impact of this venture capital-driven financialisation process, monopolistic or oligopolistic platform operators will cut labour bonuses on the one hand, and slash subsidies to consumers on the other hand. Workers’ incomes and benefits will inevitably go down.

The self-organisation of labouring classes

How do labouring classes conquer political and economic power through self-organisation? Social scientists have usefully proposed the connection between macro political-economy approaches and micro-processes of a collective emotional environment in explaining the formation of worker identities and cultures of solidarity (Blecher Reference Blecher2010; Fantasia Reference Fantasia1988; Pun Reference Pun2022). Class, in our conception, takes root in shared experiences, which are shaped by relations of production and by cultural transformations, as well as by everyday practices in and out of the workplace (Thompson Reference Thompson1980 [1963]; van der Linden Reference van der Linden2008). Class encompasses cultural dimensions as well as economic conditions. Workers have composed songs, letters, poems, art, and blog posts to raise collective awareness, express their voice, and mobilise public support (Garbelli Reference Garbelli2023; Sun Reference Sun, Franceschini and Sorace2022, Reference Sun2023). Different groups do not come together as a class merely because they have the same enemy, rather they must develop specific social relations, tactics, and strategies aimed at the dissolution of class society.

The (re)composition of labourers is taking place in various local communities. Migrants, for example, have built ethnic-based alliances, localistic networks, and informal settlements to foster equality and mutual support. Formal or informal workers’ struggles over work status and remuneration, sometimes with support from governments as well as non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and student-led anti-sweatshop movements, have sought comprehensive reforms centring on employment, healthcare, housing, education, and other essential human needs (Chun Reference Chun2009; CKC Chan Reference Chan2013; J Chan Reference Chan2020; Ho Reference Ho2014; Lee Reference Lee2007, Reference Lee, Breman, Harris, Lee and van der Linden2019; Liu Reference Liu2015; Ross Reference Ross2004; Seidman Reference Seidman2007). A labouring class in unity – when overcoming and transcending intra-class divisions and fragmentations by gender, citizenship status, and racial/ethnic differences – can better resist exploitation to reclaim human dignity and collective capacity (Morrison et al Reference Morrison, Sacchetto and Croucher2020; Perrotta & Sacchetto Reference Perrotta and Sacchetto2014).

Worldwide, workers have been able to get together in their milieu, and at times even to build cross-class alliances, in order to advance their interests and rights. Protesters have mobilised ‘structural power’ to disrupt production at the workplace level, particularly when they occupied a strategic location in close-knit production and logistics structures, henceforth bargaining with managers and/or pro-labour officials to achieve workers’ goals (Alimahomed-Wilson & Reese Reference Alimahomed-Wilson and Reese2020; Cowen Reference Cowen2014; Silver Reference Silver2003). In analysing worker resistance, Elfström (Reference Elfström2021, 21) sees that labour actions can be ‘distinguished by the varying level of pressure that they bring to bear on the state’. Chinese workers and their supporters are engaging in contained, boundary-spanning, or transgressive contention, while three approaches are sometimes combined to strengthen grassroots pressure. ‘Contained resistance’ refers to workers’ claim-making through legal pathways. ‘Boundary-spanning resistance’ denotes workers’ demands for improved conditions such as higher wages (above legal minimum levels). ‘Transgressive resistance’ involves more ambitious worker goals like establishing independent trade unions (outside party-state domination). Mobilisation would be strengthened by the coordination of actions among workers and their allies, yet would carry a high risk of crackdowns by companies and authorities (Fu Reference Fu2018). Indeed, in contemporary China, labour unrest is correlated with greater spending on armed police personnel and equipment, denoting the increased repressive capacity of the state. Meanwhile, co-optation of service-oriented social organisations is giving rise to the growth of ‘government-organised NGOs’. Repression and responsiveness, though difficult to coordinate across different levels and between different arms of the government, is integral to authoritarian evolution.

Contributions to the internationally coordinated themed collection

Four journals participated in this themed collection on labour conflict: Economic and Labour Relations Review (ELRR), Global Labour Journal (GLJ), Partecipazione e Conflitto (Participation and Conflict, PACO), and Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Trabajo (The Latin American Journal of Labor Studies, RELET). The following three articles, based on conceptual discussions and empirical case studies, shed light on work-related conflicts and autonomous worker organisations in the context of contemporary Europe (Carstensen Reference Carstensen2023; Marà et al Reference Marà, Pulignano and Stewart2023; Neuhauser & Birke Reference Neuhauser and Birke2023).

Claudia Marà, Valeria Pulignano, and Paul Stewart (Reference Marà, Pulignano and Stewart2023) present a longitudinal study of labour struggles in the food delivery sector in the city of Bologna, Italy. Focusing on Riders Union Bologna, a group of riders and grassroots activists who have long sought to tackle precariousness outside the formal union structure, the authors analyse synergies between old and new forms of labour actors amid the shifting national union traditions. The collaboration between traditional and self-organised unions suggests a possibility for progressive change in the long run.

Johanna Neuhauser and Peter Birke (Reference Neuhauser and Birke2023) deploy the power resources approach to analyse labour unrest in three non-union sectors (meat industry, mask production, and postal services) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany and Austria. The authors propose the conceptualisation of ‘multiple precarity’ to understand strikes and conflicts in workplaces where wages of predominantly low-level migrant workers remain very low. They have unveiled the conditions of insecurity and inequality confronted by these ‘essential workers’, who have maintained the functioning of urban and rural systems of production and distribution.

Anne Lisa Carstensen (Reference Carstensen2023) seeks to explain migrant labour conflict through the lens of temporality. She highlights temporal limitations that are often associated with migration processes, resulting from restrictive work permits and other state regulations, and the seasonality as well as fixed-contract terms of specific jobs in which migrants are usually employed. The consequences of this temporally unstable work on migrants’ social reproduction makes temporality a fundamental conceptual device in studies of migrants’ labour. Indeed, management has capitalised on a migrant workforce to increase flexibility and cut costs, while sometimes triggering collective resistance.

In summary, the contributing authors (Carstensen Reference Carstensen2023; Marà et al Reference Marà, Pulignano and Stewart2023; Neuhauser & Birke Reference Neuhauser and Birke2023) ask how socio-political and economic factors, as well as the temporal dimension of migration, influence labour upsurge, labour market inclusion, and containment of worker unrest. Temporary or contingent low-wage migrants, particularly those who have small children and other familial responsibility, are often constrained to lead and organise large-scale labour campaigns. High staff turnover further weakens mutual support and solidarity networks among co-workers. New empirical research evidence nevertheless reveals that different groups, including but not limited to low-paid migrants and gig labourers (comprising crowdsourced workers and subcontractor workers employed by agencies and subcontractors), have participated in union organising, social networking, and collective action in advancing their rights and interests.

Conclusion

Class is one of the fundamental forms of social power. From past to present, workers, peasants, and other civil society actors have fiercely contested exploitation, privatisation, and imperialism with the goal to create a better society (Appelbaum & Lichtenstein Reference Appelbaum and Lichtenstein2016; Harvey Reference Harvey2003, Reference Harvey2005; Hung Reference Hung2011; Koo Reference Koo2001; Perry Reference Perry1993; Selden Reference Selden1995; Wallerstein Reference Wallerstein1979). This article reflects on the need to more explicitly set class domination as the normative dimension for labour studies, henceforth orienting scholars who seek to produce knowledge supportive of workers. Kalleberg and colleagues, rather than prescribing barely adequate services or financial needs to the most adversely affected individuals, call for a ‘class-based redistribution of income and wealth’ to ‘reduce the inequality between nonregular and regular workers’ (Kalleberg et al Reference Kalleberg, Hewison and Shin2022, 14). For Selwyn (Reference Selwyn2017), social ownership instead of private or state ownership of means of production is critical to maximising workers’ power. ‘The identification and satisfaction of communal needs and purposes’, in his formulation, ‘will be predicated upon cooperation within and between workplaces and communities’ (Selwyn Reference Selwyn2017, 131). Labour is to be democratically coordinated to produce use values for people.

As e-commerce retailers and their logistics partners seek to speed up production and circulation in this age of digital capitalism, the needs of human labour continue to resist management aspirations to achieve frictionless logistics linking one-click orders to super-fast doorstep delivery (Hua Reference Hua2018; Qiu Reference Qiu2022). In what ways can we hold global financial capital and platform corporations accountable to create decent working conditions? How will the balance of power between managers and workers, and between the state and companies, shift? The COVID-19 emergency has made more evident the deep-seated class, race, and ethnic, as well as gender divides shaping working people’s access to work, quality jobs, and living wages. The struggle for redistributing resources and creating greater social protections for all workers must carry on in the post-COVID era.

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges helpful comments by editors and reviewers of the Economic and Labour Relations Review. She also thanks Claire Ceruti and Mark Selden for editorial advice in preparing this article. Last but not least, the contributors of this themed collection presented the early versions of their papers and received constructive feedback from participants at the 2022 International Labour Process Conference.

Funding statement

This themed collection was supported by funding from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (P0041395; P0042704).

Competing interests

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning this article’s research, authorship, and/or publication.

Jenny Chan is an associate professor of sociology at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University and an elected vice-president of the International Sociological Association’s Research Committee on Labor Movements (2018–2023). She is the co-author, with Mark Selden and Pun Ngai, of Dying for an iPhone (Pluto Press & Haymarket Books 2020), which was translated into Korean (Narumbooks 2021), and awarded CHOICE’s Outstanding Academic Title regarding China (2022) and Work & Labor (2022). Her ongoing project examines digitalisation and informalisation of labour in Chinese state capitalism.

Footnotes

1 For the additional articles published in this themed collection in Global Labour Journal (GLJ), Partecipazione e Conflitto (Participation and Conflict, PACO), and Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Trabajo (The Latin American Journal of Labor Studies, RELET), see the editorial essay by Maurizio Atzeni and Devi Sacchetto. The entire collection, with four participating journals including the Economic and Labour Relations Review, was originated from a special stream titled ‘Labour Conflict, Forms of Organisation and Class’, proposed by Maurizio Atzeni, Jenny Chan and Devi Sacchetto for the International Labour Process Conference, April 2022.

References

Agarwala, R (2013) Informal Labor, Formal Politics, and Dignified Discontent in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwala, R (2022) The Migration-Development Regime: How Class Shapes Indian Emigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, G and Però, D (2018) Migrating industrial relations: migrant workers’ initiative within and outside trade unions. British Journal of Industrial Relations 56, 693715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alimahomed-Wilson, J and Reese, E (eds) (2020) The Cost of Free Shipping: Amazon in the Global Economy. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B (2020) AND ABOUT TIME TOO …: migration, documentation, and temporalities. In Horton, SB and Heyman, J (eds), Paper Trails: Migrants, Documents, and Legal Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 5373.Google Scholar
Anner, MS (2011) Solidarity Transformed: Labor Responses to Globalization and Crisis in Latin America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, R and Lichtenstein, N (eds) (2016) Achieving Workers’ Rights in the Global Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzeni, M (2010) Workplace Conflict: Mobilization and Solidarity in Argentina. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzeni, M (ed) (2014) Workers and Labour in a Globalised Capitalism: Contemporary Themes and Theoretical Issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzeni, M (2021) Workers’ organisations and the fetishism of the trade union form: toward new pathways for research on the labour movement? Globalizations 18, 13491362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzeni, M (2022) A Marxist perspective of workers’ collective action. In Piva, A and Santella, A (eds), Marxism, Social Movements, and Collective Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 137162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baglioni, E, Campling, L, Coe, N and Smith, A (2022) Labour Regimes and Global Production. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blecher, M (2010) Globalization, structural reform, and labour politics in China. Global Labour Journal 1, 92111.Google Scholar
Boris, E, Gottfried, H, Greene, J and Tham, JC (eds) (2023) Global Labor Migration: New Directions. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Breman, J, Harris, K, Lee, CK and van der Linden, M (eds) (2019) The Social Question in the Twenty-First Century: A Global View. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, M (1985) The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes under Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Carstensen, AL (2023) The Chronos of class conflict: the relevance of the temporal dimension in conflicts related to labour migration. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M and Portes, A (1989) World underneath: the origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy. In Portes, A, Castells, M and Benton, LA (eds), The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1137.Google Scholar
Chan, CKC (2013) Community-based organizations for migrant workers’ rights: the emergence of labour NGOs in China. Community Development Journal 48, 622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, J (2018) Assessing working-class power in postsocialist China. In Roth, KH (ed), On the Road to Global Labor History: A Festschrift for Marcel van der Linden. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 164183.Google Scholar
Chan, J (2020) A precarious worker-student alliance in Xi’s China. The China Review 20, 165190.Google Scholar
Chan, J (2021) Worker organizing in China: challenges and opportunities. In Ovetz, R (ed), Workers’ Inquiry and Global Class Struggle: Strategies, Tactics, Objectives. London: Pluto Press, 197217.Google Scholar
Chan, J (2023) Buy with 1-Click: independent contracting and migrant workers in China’s last-mile parcel delivery. The Asia-Pacific Journal 21, 118.Google Scholar
Chan, J, Nair, M and Rhomberg, C (2019) Precarization and labor resistance: Canada, the United States, India and China. Critical Sociology 45, 469483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, J, Selden, M and Pun, N (2020). Dying for an iPhone: Apple, Foxconn and the Lives of China’s Workers. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books and London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Chen, F (2009) Union power in China: source, operation, and constraints. Modern China 35, 662689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, JJ (2009) Organizing at the Margins: The Symbolic Politics of Labor in South Korea and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Connell, RW and Messerschmidt, JW (2005) Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender & Society 19, 829859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, D (2014) The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Porta, D, Chesta, RE and Cini, L (2023) Labour Conflicts in the Digital Age: A Comparative Perspective. Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
Drahokoupil, J and Vandaele, K (eds) (2021) A Modern Guide to Labour and the Platform Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfström, M (2021) Workers and Change in China: Resistance, Repression, Responsiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantasia, R (1988) Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action, and Contemporary American Workers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Federici, S (2004) Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
Ford, M (2009) Workers and Intellectuals: NGOs, Trade Unions and the Indonesian Labour Movement. Singpaore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
Ford, M (2019) From Migrant to Worker: Global Unions and Temporary Labor Migration in Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, A (2022) The Future of Unions and Worker Representation: The Digital Picket Line. Oxford: Hart Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N (2016) Contradictions of Capital and Care. New Left Review 100, 99117.Google Scholar
Friedman, E (2014) Insurgency Trap: Labor Politics in Postsocialist China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, E (2022) The Urbanization of People: The Politics of Development, Labor Markets, and Schooling in the Chinese City. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, D (2018) Mobilizing Without the Masses: Control and Contention in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fürst, J, Pons, S and Selden, M (eds) (2017) The Cambridge History of Communism, Volume III, Endgames? Late Communism in Global Perspective 1968 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, ME (2017) Authoritarian Legality in China: Law, Workers, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandini, A (2019) Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations 72, 10391056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbelli, M (2023) Poetry and labour(s): Chinese workers’ poetry from the Cultural Revolution to the twenty-first century. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale 59, 357392.Google Scholar
Goodburn, C and Mishra, S (2023) Beyond the dormitory labour regime: comparing Chinese and Indian workplace–residence systems as strategies of migrant labour control. Work, Employment and Society, 122. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221142717 Google Scholar
Gutierrez Crocco, F and Atzeni, M (2022) The effects of the pandemic on gig economy couriers in Argentina and Chile: precarity, algorithmic control and mobilization. International Labour Review 161, 441461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D (2003) The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermanson, J (2023) Mexican labor’s New Deal and the promise of North American worker solidarity. New Labor Forum 32, 1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, MS (2014) Working Class Formation in Taiwan: Fractured Solidarity in State-Owned Enterprises, 1945–2012. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, J (2018) The Foxconn suicides: human vitality and capitalist consumption. Women’s Studies in Communication 41, 320323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, HF (2011) Protest with Chinese Characteristics: Demonstrations, Riots, and Petitions in the Mid-Qing Dynasty. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, HF (ed) (2009) China and the Transformation of Global Capitalism. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO (International Labor Organization) (2021) World Employment and Social Outlook: The Role of Digital Labour Platforms in Transforming the World of Work. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, AL (2009) Precarious work and insecure workers: employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review 74, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, AL and Vallas, SP (2018) Probing precarious work: theory, research, and politics. Research in the Sociology of Work 31, 130.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, AL, Hewison, K and Shin, KY (2022) Precarious Asia: Global Capitalism and Work in Japan, South Korea, and Indonesia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kassem, S (2022) (Re)shaping Amazon labour struggles on both sides of the Atlantic: the power dynamics in Germany and the US amidst the pandemic. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 28, 441456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J (2013) Chinese Labor in a Korean Factory: Class, Ethnicity, and Productivity on the Shop Floor in Globalizing China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Koo, H (2001) Korean Workers: The Culture and Politics of Class Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuruvilla, S, Lee, CK and Gallagher, ME (eds) (2011) From Iron Rice Bowl to Informalization: Markets, Workers, and the State in a Changing China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, BH, Swider, S and Tilly, C (2020) Informality in action: a relational look at informal work. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 61, 91100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, CK (2007) Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, CK (2019) The social question as the struggle over precarity: the case of China. In Breman, J, Harris, K, Lee, CK and van der Linden, M (eds), The Social Question in the Twenty-First Century: A Global View. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 5876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, YW (2021) Delivering solidarity: platform architecture and collective contention in China’s platform economy. American Sociological Review 86, 279309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X (2022) Managerial technique and worker subjectivity in dialogue: understanding overwork in China’s internet industry. Work, Employment and Society, 118. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221092585 Google Scholar
Liu, C and Friedman, E (2021) Resistance under the radar: organization of work and collective action in China’s food delivery industry. The China Journal 86, 6889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, HJ (2015) Leverage of the Weak: Labor and Environmental Movements in Taiwan and South Korea. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, IT (2018) Rethinking labor unionism in spaces of precarious work. In Atzeni, M and Ness, I (eds), Global Perspectives on Workers’ and Labour Organisations. Singapore: Springer, pp. 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marà, C, Pulignano, V and Stewart, P (2023) Dynamics of unionism in the platform economy: the case of the food delivery sector in Bologna, Italy. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K (1990 [1867]) Capital. Volume 1: A Critique of Political Economy. Fowkes, Ben (trans). London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
McGrath, S and Strauss, K (2015) Unfreedom and workers’ power: ever-present possibilities. In van der Pijl, K (ed), Handbook of the International Political Economy of Production. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 299317.Google Scholar
Milkman, R and Voss, K (2004) Rebuilding Labor: Organizing and Organizers in the New Union Movement. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, S and Newsome, K (2018) Paying for free delivery: dependent self-employment as a measure of precarity in parcel delivery. Work, Employment and Society 32, 475492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, C, Sacchetto, D and Croucher, R (2020) Migration, ethnicity and solidarity: ‘multinational workers’ in the former Soviet Union. British Journal of Industrial Relations 58, 761784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ness, I (2023) Migration as Economic Imperialism: How International Labour Mobility Undermines Economic Development in Poor Countries. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Neuhauser, J and Birke, P (2023) Migrant labour and labour unrest during the pandemic: studies from Germany and Austria. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, J (2019) Mass Strikes and Social Movements in Brazil and India: Popular Mobilisation in the Long Depression. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, J (2023) Variegated Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrotta, DC and Sacchetto, D (2014) Migrant farmworkers in Southern Italy: ghettoes, caporalato and collective action. Workers of the World 1, 7598.Google Scholar
Perry, EJ (1993) Shanghai on Strike: The Politics of Chinese Labor. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pringle, T (2011) Trade Unions in China: The Challenge of Labour Unrest. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, N (2022) Marx’s theories and beyond: Understanding working-class solidarity in China. Critical Sociology 48, 12371252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, JL (2022) Humanizing the posthuman: digital labour, food delivery, and openings for the new human during the pandemic. International Journal of Cultural Studies 25, 445461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rème-Harnay, P (2023) Precarity and subcontracting relationships: the case of parcel delivery drivers in France. Work, Employment and Society, 119. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221142721 Google Scholar
Rhomberg, C and Lopez, S (2021) Understanding strikes in the 21st century: perspectives from the United States. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 44, 3762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, M and Atzeni, M (2020) Workers’ power in resisting precarity: comparing transport workers in Buenos Aires and Dar es Salaam. Work, Employment and Society 34, 11141130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, DR (1991) The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Roediger, DR and Esch, ED (2012) The Production of Difference: Race and the Management of Labor in U.S. History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, A (2004) Low Pay, High Profile: The Global Push for Fair Labor. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
Scholz, T (2017) Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Seidman, GW (2007) Beyond the Boycott: Labor Rights, Human Rights, and Transnational Activism. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Selden, M (1995) China in Revolution: The Yenan Way Revisited. 2nd ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Selwyn, B (2017) The Struggle for Development. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Silver, BJ (2003) Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solinger, DJ (2009) States’ Gains, Labor’s Losses: China, France, and Mexico Choose Global Liaisons, 1980–2000. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Srnicek, N (2017) Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Standing, G (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Sun, P and Chen, JY (2021) Platform labour and contingent agency in China. China Perspectives 1, 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, W (2022) Bearing witness to history: dagong poets from the 1980s to the present. In Franceschini, I and Sorace, C (eds), Proletarian China: A Century of Chinese Labour. London: Verso, 656663.Google Scholar
Sun, W (2023) The worker-poet as the ethnographic partner: documenting the emotional pain of rural migrant women. Positions 31, 403429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M and Rioux, S (2018) Global Labour Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Tassinari, A and Maccarrone, V (2020) Riders on the storm: workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society 34, 3554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, EP (1980 [1963]) The Making of the English Working Class. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tilly, C and Tilly, C (1998) Work Under Capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Vallas, S and Schor, JB (2020) What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology 46, 273294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallas, SP and Hill, AL (2018) Reconfiguring worker subjectivity: career advice literature and the ‘branding’ of the worker’s self. Sociological Forum 33, 287309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Linden, M (2008) Workers of the World: Essays Toward a Global Labor History. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, I (1979) The Capitalist-World Economy: Essays by Immanuel Wallerstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, E, Lambert, R and Bezuidenhout, A (2008) Grounding Globalization: Labour in the Age of Insecurity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, AJ, Graham, M, Lehdonvirta, V and Hjorth, I (2019) Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society 33, 5675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodcock, J (2020) The algorithmic panopticon at Deliveroo: measurement, precarity, and the illusion of control. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 30, 6795.Google Scholar
Wright, EO (ed) (2005) Approaches to Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Q, Zhang, H, Li, Z and Liu, K (2019) Labor control in the gig economy: evidence from Uber in China. Journal of Industrial Relations 61, 574596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, S (2019) Understanding the employment status of gig-workers in China’s sharing economy era—an empirical legal study. Asian Journal of Law and Economics 10, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L (2023) The Labor of Reinvention: Entrepre neurship in the New Chinese Digital Economy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar