Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T01:38:44.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Last Post: Henry V, War Culture and the Postmodern Shakespeare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Robert Shaughnessy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“Marketing, that mysterious part of the theatre industry, can produce surprising effects,” observes Peter Holland in his recent book on Shakespearean production in Britain during the 1990s. Discussing the material constraints on the repertory of the Royal Shakespeare Company, Holland cites the promotion of the 1994 production of Coriolanus as it transferred to the Barbican, which, knowingly addressed a “youth” market versed in the work of Oliver Stone and Quentin Tarantino. The RSC poster displayed a blood-soaked Toby Stephens in the title role, accompanied by the slogan “A natural born killer too.” For an even more surprising and mysterious example of optimistically modish marketing, consider the tactics of the newspaper advertisement announcing the 1996 season at Stratford-upon-Avon. Avoiding any direct mention of Shakespeare, his plays, or theatre, it pictured an ominously darkened cloudscape, with slogans projected onto it, almost like skywriting. These posed a question, “Virtual reality?” and a riposte: “Try the real thing.”

Type
Articles
Information
Theatre Survey , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , May 1998 , pp. 41 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Holland, Peter, English Shakespeares: Shakespeare on the English Stage in the 1990s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 10Google Scholar.

2. Jameson, Fredric, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (London: Verso, 1991), 3Google Scholar.

3. See, for example, Hofele, Andreas, “A Theater of Exhaustion? ‘Posthistoire’ in Recent German Shakespeare Productions,” Shakespeare Quarterly 43 (1992), 80–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Birringer, Johannes, Theatre, Theory, Postmodernism (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1993)Google Scholar, Hattaway, Michael, Sokolova, Boika, and Roper, Derek, eds., Shakespeare in the New Europe (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Bennett, Susan, Performing Nostalgia: Shifting Shakespeare and the Contemporary Past (London: Routledge, 1996)Google Scholar; Bulman, James C., Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance (London: Routledge, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Worthen, W. B., Shakespeare and the Authority of Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. Kennedy, , Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

5. Hodgdon, Barbara, “Looking for Mr. Shakespeare After ‘The Revolution’: Robert Lepage's Intercultural Dream Machine,” in Bulman, Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance, 81Google Scholar.

6. Styan, , The Shakespeare Revolution: Criticism and Performance in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977), 232–233Google Scholar.

7. Quoted in Hiley, Jim, “A Company with Direction,” Plays and Players, October 1977Google Scholar.

8. See Thomson, Peter, “Towards a Poor Shakespeare: The Royal Shakespeare Company at Stratford in 1975,” Shakespeare Survey 29 (1976), 151–156Google Scholar.

9. Grady, , The Modernist Shakespeare: Critical Texts in a Material World (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

10. Accounts of the critical influences upon the RSC's work are given by Sinfield, Alan, “Royal Shakespeare: Theatre and the Making of Ideology,” in Dollimore, Jonathan and Sinfield, Alan eds., Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985), 158–181Google Scholar; McCullough, Christopher J., “The Cambridge Connection: Towards a Materialist Theatre Practice,” in Holdemess, Graham ed., The Shakespeare Myth (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988), 112–121Google Scholar; and Shaughnessy, Robert, Representing Shakespeare: England, History and the RSC (Hemel Hemsptead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994)Google Scholar.

11. Quoted in Coveney, Michael, “Terry Hands, Adrian Noble and Peter Hall, Masters of the RSC, Talk Theatre,” Observer, 28 June 1992Google Scholar.

12. Shrimpton, Nicholas, “Shakespeare Performances in Stratford-upon-Avon and London, 1981–82,” Shakespeare Survey 36 (1983), 149Google Scholar.

13. Ibid., 152.

14. Warren, Roger, “Shakespeare in Stratford and London, 1982,” Shakespeare Quarterly 34 (1983), 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15. Jameson, Postmodernism, 18.

16. Shrimpton, , “Shakespeare Performances in Stratford-upon-Avon and London, 1983–4,” Shakespeare Survey 38 (1985), 202Google Scholar.

17. Ibid., 204.

18. Shrimpton, , “Shakespeare Performances in London, Manchester and Stratford-upon-Avon 1985–6,” Shakespeare Survey 40 (1988), 173Google Scholar.

19. Wells, , “Shakespeare Production in England in 1989,” Shakespeare Survey 43 (1990), 200Google Scholar.

20. Smallwood, Robert, “Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon, 1989 (Part I),” Shakespeare Quarterly 41 (1990), 109Google Scholar.

21. Kaye, Nick, Postmodernism and Performance (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994), 68–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22. Cropper, Martin, The Times, 15 May 1985Google Scholar.

23. Jameson, , Postmodernism, 38Google Scholar.

24. Quoted in “Set Pieces That Release the Forces of Darkness,” Guardian, 17 April 1984.

25. Kennedy, , Looking at Shakespeare, 294Google Scholar.

26. Shrimpton, “Shakespeare Performances 1983–4,” 202.

27. Shrimpton, , “Shakespeare Performances in London and Stratford-upon-Avon, 1984–5,” Shakespeare Survey 39 (1986), 197–199Google Scholar.

28. Smallwood, , “Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon, 1990,” Shakespeare Quarterly 42 (1991), 348CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Holland, , “Shakespeare Performances in England, 1989–90,” Shakespeare Survey 44 (1991), 176Google Scholar.

29. Sinfield, “Royal Shakespeare,” 159.

30. Nightingale, , New Statesman, 11 June 1982Google Scholar; Smallwood, “Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon, 1989,” 108; Holland, “Shakespeare Performances in England, 1989–90,” 176.

31. Healy, “Remembering with Advantages; Nation and Ideology in Henry V,” in Hattaway et al., Shakespeare in the New Europe, 181.

32. Banham, , “BBC Television's Dull Shakespeares,” Critical Quarterly 22, 1 (1980), 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Berry, , Changing Styles in Shakespeare (London: Allen and Unwin, 1981), 67Google Scholar.

33. Donaldson, , “Taking on Shakespeare: Kenneth Branagh's Henry V,” Shakespeare Quarterly 42 (1991), 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34. Quoted in The Times, 5 October 1989.

35. Holdemess, Graham, Shakespeare Recycled: The Making of Historical Drama (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992), 184Google Scholar.

36. Ibid., 185.

37. Leonard, , Plays and Players, August 1965Google Scholar; Evans, Lloyd, “Shakespeare, the Twentieth Century and “Behaviourism,” Shakespeare Survey 20 (1967), 139Google Scholar; Speaight, , “Shakespeare in Britain,” Shakespeare Quarterly 15 (1964), 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brown, , “Three Kinds of Shakespeare: 1964 Productions in London, Stratford-upon-Avon and Edinburgh,” Shakespeare Survey 18 (1965), 151Google Scholar.

38. Hands, , “Introduction to the Play,” in Beaumann, Sally, ed., The Royal Shakespeare Company's Centenary Production of Henry v (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1976), 15–16Google Scholar.

39. Warren, , “Shakespeare in Britain,” Shakespeare Quarterly 36 (1985), 81Google Scholar.

40. King, , Sunday Telegraph, 19 May 1985Google Scholar; Young, , Financial Times, 17 May 1985Google Scholar; Morley, , Punch, 29 May 1985Google Scholar.

41. Jongh, De, Evening Standard, 11 May 1994Google Scholar; Peachment, , Sunday Telegraph, 15 May 1994Google Scholar; Nightingale, , The Times, 12 May 1994Google Scholar; Spencer, , Daily Telegraph, 12 May 1994Google Scholar; Jackson, , “Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon, 1994–95,” Shakespeare Quarterly 46 (1995), 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42. Ibid., 343.

43. Woddis, , What's On, 18 May 1994Google Scholar; Wardle, , The Times, 15 May 1994Google Scholar; Jackson, “Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon,” 342.

44. Holland, , “Shakespeare Performances in England, 1993–1994,” Shakespeare Survey 48 (1995), 208Google Scholar.

45. Nathan, , Jewish Chronicle, 20 May 1994Google Scholar.

46. There was an analagous moment in the 1984 Henry V when Branagh's Henry and McDiarmid's Chorus unexpectedly encountered one another on the eve of Agincourt, and, in Holderness's account, “miming a surprised double-take of near-recognition;” for a brief moment, as in the 1994 production, “we saw the fictional world of the dramatic action suddenly enter the fictionalizing activity of the Chorus” (Shakespeare Recycled, 200). In 1984, the surprise meeting was played for comic effect, whereas in 1994 it was strangely moving.

47. I. Q. Hunter, “Capitalism Most Triumphant: Bill and Ted's Excellent History Lesson,” in Cartmell, Deborah, Hunter, I. Q., Kaye, Heidi and Whelehan, Imelda, eds., Pulping Fictions: Consuming Culture across the Literature/Media Divide (London: Pluto Press, 1996), 122Google Scholar.

48. Jackson, “Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon, 1994–95,” 342–43.

49. Jameson, Postmodernism, 45.

50. De Jongh, Evening Standard; Spencer, Daily Telegraph; Peter, Sunday Times, 15 May 1994; Nathan, Jewish Chronicle; Woddis, What's On.

51. Billington, , Guardian, 12 May 1994Google Scholar; Wardle, , Independent on Sunday, 15 May 1994Google Scholar.

52. Quoted in “This Beer Isn't a Beer: Interview with Arme Laurent,” in Gane, Mike ed., Baudrillard Live: Selected Interviews (London: Routledge, 1993), 185Google Scholar.

53. As a postscript to the above, the 1994 Henry V was followed, with unusual swiftness, by a brash and poorly-received production at Stratford three years later. It is also worth noting that the inaugural production at the Bankside Globe the same year was a self-consciously “Elizabethan,” all-male Henry V, directed by Olivier's son.