Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T22:34:50.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sound and Writing: Complementary Facets of the Anglo-Scottish Ballad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Abstract

The Anglo-Scottish ‘traditional’ ballad has coexisted in the different media of sound and writing from the early modern period to the present day. Nevertheless, it became the orthodoxy in the twentieth century that the ballad should be conceptually tied to its vocal performance. This essay seeks to argue that in fact a hierarchy of documentation that privileges sound is misleading. Rather, the ballad has always been, and remains, accessible through complementary media, fulfilling different purposes and following different conventions.

It considers different levels of music-writing (‘prescriptive’ and ‘descriptive’) and the non-indexical relationship between sound and writing in the ontology of music. It goes on to relate the privileging of sound over writing to the ‘metaphysics of presence’, and offers theoretical reasons as to why both sound and writing can in fact be divorced from the metaphysics of presence. A further analogy is offered with the work of the text and music editor in establishing a ‘set of instructions’ for the reconstruction of the ‘work’. Some pragmatic examples and theoretical principles are considered in relation to how ballad words might be transcribed, leading to the conclusion that different and complementary sets of instructions facilitate access to the intangible ballad, without the need to posit any hierarchical relationship between sound and writing.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Discography

Down in the Fields: an Anthology of Traditional Folk Music from Rural England. CD. Veteran VTC4CD, 2001.Google Scholar
Unto Brigg Fair: Joseph Taylor and Other Traditional Lincolnshire Singers Recorded in 1908 by Percy Grainger. 12-inch LP. Leader LEA 4050, 1972.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Abrahams, Roger D., and Foss, George. Anglo-American Folksong Style. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968.Google Scholar
Atkinson, David. ‘From Text to Work: Reconceptualizing Folk Songs as Texts’, in Dear Far-Voiced Veteran: Essays in Honour of Tom Munnelly, ed. Clune, Anne. Miltown Malbay: Old Kilfarboy Society, 2007. 114.Google Scholar
Atkinson, David. ‘Where Is the Ballad, and Why Do We Want So Many of Them? An Essay in Ontology’. Lied und populäre Kultur / Song and Popular Culture 54 (2009), 1132.Google Scholar
‘Ballad of “The Three Sisters”’. Notes and Queries, 1st series, 6 (1852), 102.Google Scholar
Barry, Phillips. ‘The Part of the Folk Singer in the Making of Folk Balladry’, in The Critics & the Ballad, ed. Leach, MacEdward and Coffin, Tristram P.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1961. 5976.Google Scholar
Bearman, C. J.‘Percy Grainger, the Phonograph, and the Folk Song Society’. Music & Letters 84 (2003), 434–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility’, in Selected Writings, vol. 3: 1935–1938, trans. Jephcott, Edmund, Eiland, Howard et al. , ed. Eiland, Howard and Jennings, Michael W.. Cambridge, MA, and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002. 101–33.Google Scholar
Bishop, Julia C.‘“Dr Carpenter from the Harvard College in America”: an Introduction to James Madison Carpenter and his Collection’. Folk Music Journal 7/4 (1998), 402–20.Google Scholar
Bishop, Julia C.. Grouping, Grawping and Groping towards a Critical Edition of the James Madison Carpenter Collection of Traditional Song and Drama’, Dialect and Folk Life Studies in Britain: The Leeds Archive of Vernacular Culture in its Context, University of Leeds, 19 March 2005 <http://www.leeds.ac.uk/library/spcoll/lavc/Conference%20Paper%20PDFs/JuliaBishop2.pdf> (accessed 15 July 2011).+(accessed+15+July+2011).>Google Scholar
Bodleian Library Broadside Ballads <http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/ballads/ballads.htm> (accessed 15 July 2011).+(accessed+15+July+2011).>Google Scholar
Bradtke, Elaine. ‘Fiddle Tunes from under the Bed: Extracting Music from Carpenter's Recordings’, in Crossing Over, ed. Russell, and Guigné, Kearney. 3548.Google Scholar
Brady, Erika. A Spiral Way: How the Phonograph Changed Ethnography. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 1999.Google Scholar
Bronson, Bertrand Harris. The Traditional Tunes of the Child Ballads, with Their Texts, According to the Extant Records of Great Britain and America. 4 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959–72; repr. CAMSCO Music/Loomis House Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bronson, Bertrand Harris. The Ballad as Song. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronson, Bertrand Harris. ed. The Singing Tradition of Child's Popular Ballads. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976. Repr. CAMSCO Music / Loomis House Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Buchan, David. The Ballad and the Folk. London and Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.Google Scholar
Burns, Tom. ‘A Model for Textual Variation in Folksong’. Folklore Forum 3 (1970), 4956.Google Scholar
[Carpenter, James Madison]. Washington, DC, Library of Congress, American Folklife Center, Archive of Folk Culture, AFC1972/001, James Madison Carpenter Collection.Google Scholar
Cheesman, Tom. The Shocking Ballad Picture Show: German Popular Literature and Cultural History. Oxford and Providence, RI: Berg, 1994.Google Scholar
Child, Francis James, ed. The English and Scottish Popular Ballads. 5 vols. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1882–98; repr. New York: Dover, 1965, 2003.Google Scholar
Cowen, Ron. ‘Earliest Known Sound Recordings Revealed: Researchers Unveil Imprints Made 20 Years before Edison Invented Phonograph’. US News and World Report – Science, 1 June 2009 <http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2009/06/01/earliest-known-sound-recordings-revealed> (accessed 15 July 2011).+(accessed+15+July+2011).>Google Scholar
Davis, Arthur Kyle jr, ed. More Traditional Ballads of Virginia, Collected with the Cooperation of Members of the Virginia Folklore Society. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology, corrected edn, trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. How to Read Derrida. London: Granta, 2005.Google Scholar
Donatelli, Joseph. ‘The Percy Folio Manuscript: a Seventeenth-Century Context for Medieval Poetry’. English Manuscript Studies 1100–1700 4 (1993), 114–33.Google Scholar
Dorson, Richard M.Buying the Wind: Regional Folklore in the United States. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Dugaw, Dianne M.‘Anglo-American Folksong Reconsidered: the Interface of Oral and Written Forms’. Western Folklore 43 (1984), 83103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugaw, Dianne M.. Warrior Women and Popular Balladry, 1650–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989; repr. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ellis, Bill. ‘Why Are Verbatim Texts of Legends Necessary?’, in Perspectives on Contemporary Legend, vol. 2, ed. Bennett, Gillian, Smith, Paul, and Widdowson, J. D. A.. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press for the Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, 1987. 3160.Google Scholar
Fine, Elizabeth. ‘In Defense of Literary Dialect: a Response to Dennis R. Preston’. Journal of American Folklore 96 (1983), 323–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Elizabeth. The Folklore Text: from Performance to Print. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Franco Vázquez, Alfonso. ‘The Galician Fiddle Style’, in Crossing Over, ed. Russell, and Guigné, Kearney. 200–14.Google Scholar
Freeman, Graham. ‘“That Chief Undercurrent of My Mind”: Percy Grainger and the Aesthetics of English Folk Song’. Folk Music Journal 9/4 (2009), 581617.Google Scholar
Friedman, Albert B. ‘The Oral-Formulaic Theory of Balladry – a Re-rebuttal’, in The Ballad Image: Essays Presented to Bertrand Harris Bronson, ed. Porter, James. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Comparative Folklore & Mythology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1983. 215–40.Google Scholar
Gammon, Vic. Desire, Drink and Death in English Folk and Vernacular Song, 1600–1900. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
[Gilchrist, Anne Geddes]. London, EFDSS Archive, Anne Geddes Gilchrist Collection <http://library.efdss.org/archives/> (accessed 15 July 2011).+(accessed+15+July+2011).>Google Scholar
Grainger, Percy. ‘Collecting with the Phonograph’. Journal of the Folk-Song Society 3/3 (no. 12) (1908), 147242.Google Scholar
Grier, James. The Critical Editing of Music: History, Method, and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hales, John W., and Furnivall, Frederick J., eds. Bishop Percy's Folio Manuscript: Ballads and Romances. 3 vols. London: Trübner, 1867–8.Google Scholar
Halpert, Herbert, and Widdowson, J. D. A.. ‘Folk-Narrative Performance and Tape Transcription: Theory versus Practice’. Lore & Language 5/1 (1986), 3950.Google Scholar
Halpert, Herbert, and Widdowson, J. D. A.. Folktales of Newfoundland: the Resilience of the Oral Tradition, with the assistance of Martin J. Lovelace and Eileen Collins, music transcription and commentary by Julia C. Bishop. 2 vols. New York and London: Garland, 1996.Google Scholar
Harker, David. ‘Cecil Sharp in Somerset: Some Conclusions’. Folk Music Journal 2/3 (1972), 220–40.Google Scholar
Harker, David. Fakesong: the Manufacture of British ‘Folksong’, 1700 to the Present Day. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Hints to Collectors of Folk Music. [London: Folk-Song Society, 1898].Google Scholar
Honko, Lauri. Textualising the Siri Epic. FF Communications no. 264. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia/Academia Scientiarum Fennica, 1998.Google Scholar
Honko, Lauri. ‘Thick Corpus and Organic Variation: an Introduction’, in Thick Corpus, Organic Variation and Textuality in Oral Tradition, ed. Honko, Lauri. Studia Fennica Folkloristica 7, NNF Publications 7. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 2000. 328.Google Scholar
[Hughes, Thomas]. The Scouring of the White Horse; or, The Long Vacation Ramble of a London Clerk. Cambridge and London: Macmillan, 1859.Google Scholar
Leith, Dick. ‘Problems in the Textualisation of Orally-Narrated English and Scots Folktales’. Paper presented at the Folklore Society AGM conference, Folktales Revisited, London, 4–5 April 2008.Google Scholar
Long, Eleanor R.‘Ballad Singers, Ballad Makers, and Ballad Etiology’. Western Folklore 32 (1973), 225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. S.‘“'Coz It Izny Spelt when They Say It”: Displaying Dialect in Writing’. American Speech 66 (1991), 280–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKean, Thomas A.‘Folklore Is Not (Necessarily) about Communication’. Paper presented at the 2007 Joint Annual Meeting of the American Folklore Society and the Folklore Studies Association of Canada, The Politics and Practices of Intangible Cultural Heritage, Québec, Canada, 17–21 October 2007.Google Scholar
McKean, Thomas A.. ‘The Dialect Conundrum in Transcribing Early Sound Recordings’, in From ‘Wunderhorn’ to the Internet: Perspectives on Conceptions of ‘Folk Song’ and the Editing of Traditional Songs, ed. John, Eckhard and Widmaier, Tobias. BASIS, vol. 6. Trier: WVT, 2010. 209–24.Google Scholar
Olson, Ian. ‘The Folk Song Society's Hints for Collectors (1898)’. English Dance & Song 57/1 (1995), 25.Google Scholar
Onderdonk, Julian. ‘The Revised (1904) Version of the Folk Song Society's Hints to Collectors. English Dance & Song 62/3 (2000), 21–3.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.Orality and Literacy: the Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen, 1982; repr. London and New York: Routledge, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter J.. ‘Writing Is a Technology That Restructures Thought’, in The Written Word: Literacy in Transition, Wolfson College Lectures 1985, ed. Baumann, Gerd. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986. 2350.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary <http://www.oed.com/> (accessed 15 July 2011).+(accessed+15+July+2011).>Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. ‘What Is a Sign?’, in The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2: 1893–1913, ed. the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, 1998. 410 <http://www.iupui.edu/~peirce/ep/ep2/ep2book/ch02/ep2ch2.htm> (accessed 22 May 2010).Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R.‘'Ritin' Fowklower Daun 'Rong: Folklorists' Failures in Phonology’. Journal of American Folklore 95 (1982), 304–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R.. ‘Mowr Bayud Spellin': a Reply to Fine’. Journal of American Folklore 96 (1983), 330–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollins, Hyder E.‘The Black-Letter Broadside Ballad’. Publications of the Modern Language Association 34 (1919), 258339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Jody. ‘Researchers Play Tune Recorded before Edison’. New York Times, 27 March 2008 <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/arts/27soun.html?_r=1&em&ex=1206763200&en=fe155ca1d4c4f90f&ei=5087&oref=slogin> (accessed 15 July 2011).+(accessed+15+July+2011).>Google Scholar
Rothenbuhler, Eric W., and Peters, John Durham. ‘Defining Phonography: an Experiment in Theory’. Musical Quarterly 81 (1997), 242–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Ian. ‘Stability and Change in a Sheffield Singing Tradition’. Folk Music Journal 5/3 (1987), 317–58.Google Scholar
Russell, Ian and Guigné, Anna Kearney, eds. Crossing Over: Fiddle and Dance Studies from around the North Atlantic 3. Elphinstone Institute Occasional Publications 7. Aberdeen: Elphinstone Institute, University of Aberdeen, in association with the Department of Folklore, MMaP and the School of Music, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2010.Google Scholar
Seeger, Charles. ‘Prescriptive and Descriptive Music-Writing’. Musical Quarterly 44 (1958), 184–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sharp, Cecil J.] London, Vaughan Williams Memorial Library, Cecil J. Sharp MSS, Correspondence.Google Scholar
Shillingsburg, Peter L.Scholarly Editing in the Computer Age: Theory and Practice. 3rd edn. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorrocks, Graham. ‘Reflections on the Problems of Transcribing Contemporary Legends’. Contemporary Legend 2 (1992), 93117.Google Scholar
Sterne, Jonathan. The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Tanselle, G. Thomas. A Rationale of Textual Criticism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Tanselle, G. Thomas. ‘The Varieties of Scholarly Editing’, in Scholarly Editing: a Guide to Research, ed. Greetham, D. C.. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1995. 932.Google Scholar
Thomson, Robert S. ‘The Development of the Broadside Ballad Trade and Its Influence upon the Transmission of English Folksongs’. PhD diss., University of Cambridge, 1974.Google Scholar
Treitler, Leo. ‘History and the Ontology of the Musical Work’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (1993), 483–97. Repr. in With Voice and Pen: Coming to Know Medieval Song and How It Was Made. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 298–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Tessa. Cheap Print and Popular Piety 1550–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Wehse, Rainer. ‘Broadside Ballad and Folksong: Oral Tradition versus Literary Tradition’. Folklore Forum 8 (1975), 324–34 [212].Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph, ed. The English Dialect Dictionary. 6 vols. London: Henry Frowde, 1898–1905.Google Scholar
Yates, Michael. ‘Percy Grainger and the Impact of the Phonograph’. Folk Music Journal 4/3 (1982), 265–75.Google Scholar