Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:02:06.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modernity, space and national representation at the Tokyo Olympics 1964

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

CHRISTIAN TAGSOLD
CHRISTIAN TAGSOLD*
Affiliation:
Institut für Modernes Japan, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The 1964 Tokyo Olympics acted as a rite of passage for post-war Japan, symbolizing the modernization of the city and the country. This was reflected by the space and architecture of the venues. Urban development of Olympic cities has been scrutinized recently but the symbolic implications have been touched upon only in passing, most especially in Tokyo's case. This article will show how symbolic layers of architecture and space aimed at linking history and modernity while bypassing the highly problematic legacy of ultra-nationalism and World War II. An important hub for transmitting this message was the Meiji Shrine dedicated to the first emperor of modern Japan. The hallmark building of the 1964 Games, Kenzo Tange's National Gymnasium, interacted with the shrine by way of an architectonic axis connecting them. This contrasted with the different spatial styles evident at the 1960 Olympics in Rome and 1972 Olympics in Munich, which testified to their different relationships to the national past. While developing infrastructure such as canalization and traffic was very important for Tokyo, symbolic revitalization of the city's fabric was equally crucial.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , August 2010 , pp. 289 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Seki, H., Sengo Nihon supôtsu seisaku: Sono kosoku to hatten (Japanese Sports Politics after the War: Its Inconsequences and Developments) (Tokyo, 1997)Google Scholar.

2 Tagsold, C., ‘The Tokyo Olympics as a token of renationalization’, in Niehaus, A. and Seinsch, M. (eds.), Olympic Japan. Ideals and Realities of (Inter)Nationalism (Würzburg, 2007), 111–32Google Scholar.

3 Chalkley, B. and Essex, S., ‘Urban development through hosting international events: a history of the Olympic Games’, Planning Perspectives, 14 (1999), 369–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Liao, H. and Pitts, A., ‘A brief historical review of Olympic urbanization’, International Journal for the History of Sport, 23 (2006), 1232–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Juridically, the tennô did not act as head of state when speaking the opening formula, as this might have caused counter-reactions by the socialists or communists. He was simply acting as patron of the Olympic Games. But this subtle differentiation was most likely not understood by the audience in Japan or worldwide, who surely were affirmed that the tennô actually was the head of state when watching the opening ceremony. See Tagsold, ‘The Tokyo Olympics as a token’, 116.

5 These keywords were taken from Gold, J. and Gold, M. (eds.), Olympic Cities: City Agendas, Planning and the World's Games, 1896–2012 (London, 2007)Google Scholar.

6 Some of the other main facilities, like the Komazawa Stadium in Setagaya, were set up in other wards of Tokyo because the Shinjuku/Shibuya area did not provide enough space for all venues. Still most major events like the opening and closing ceremony of the Games took place in Shinjuku or Shibuya.

7 For a good account of this, see Hardacre, H., Shinto and the State: 1868–1988 (Princeton, 1991)Google Scholar.

8 Irie, K., ‘Kindai no tennô-sei to meijijingukyôgitaikai’ (The modern Tenno-system and the Meiji Shrine Sports Days), in Yanô, K. (ed.), Undôkai to nihon kindai (Sports Days and Modern Japan) (Tokyo, 1999), 157–98Google Scholar.

9 Ibid., 164.

10 \Ikuo, A., Kiyohara, Y. and Nakajima, K., ‘Facism, sport and society in Japan’, International Journal of the History of Sport, 1 (1992), 1–28Google Scholar.

11 Collins, S., The 1940 Tokyo Games: The Missing Olympics. Japan, the Asian Olympics and the Olympic Movement (London, 2007), 112–23Google Scholar. See also The Organizing Committee of the XIIth Olympiad Tokyo 1940, Report of the Organizing Committee on its Work for the XIIth Olympics Games of 1940 in Tokyo until the Relinquishement (Tokyo, 1940), 51–81Google Scholar.

12 Furukawa, T., Kôki – banpakku – orinpikku: Koshitsu burando to keizaihatten (Tennô-festivities – Worldfair – Olympics: The Brand Tennô and Economic Development) (Tokyo, 1998), 180–5Google Scholar.

13 While Mexico City and Seoul have been scarcely touched upon in various books and papers regarding space and architecture, Beijing has been so well documented that listing all references would extend to writing a bibliography. One of the most insightful accounts is given by Brownell, S., Beijing's Games: What the Olympics Mean to China (Lanham, 2008), 97–128Google Scholar. For a rare account of Mexico City see M. Barke, ‘Mexico City 1968’, in Gold and Gold (eds.), Olympic Cities, 183–96.

14 Tagsold, ‘The Tokyo Olympics as a token’, 125.

15 Kami is often translated as ‘god’. But this would evoke false connotations, especially when speaking of a living tennô, who is also a kami, as a ‘living god’. A kami is a kind of divine ancestor, whose benevolence is important for shaping presence. In the case of tennô, as spiritual head of shintô religion and – from the mid-nineteenth century to 1945 – Father of the Nation, they are already kami alive.

16 Coaldrake, W.H., Architecture and Authority in Japan (London, 1996), 261Google Scholar.

17 Chalkley and Essex, ‘Urban development’, 374.

18 Ibid.; Liao and Pitts, ‘A brief historical review’.

19 Sakurai, T., Shisô toshite no 60-nendai (The 60s as Ideology) (Tokyo, 1993), 32Google Scholar. Igarashi came to a similiar conclusion on the symbolic meaning of urban developement regarding self-purification: Igarashi, Y., Bodies of Memory: Narratives of War in Postwar Japanese Culture, 1945–1970 (Princeton, 2000), 150–3Google Scholar.

20 Yabuki, K. (ed.), Tokyo to Yokohama: Saishin ryokô annai 5 (Tokyo and Yokohama: Latest Guide-Books 5) (Tokyo, 1963), 3Google Scholar.

21 The Organizing Committee for the Games of the XVIII Olympiad, The Official Report of the Games of the XVIII Olympiad, Tokyo 1964: Volume I (Tokyo, 1966), 48Google Scholar.

22 Ibid., 76.

23 Modrey, E., ‘Architecture as a mode of self-representation at the Olympic Games in Rome (1960) and Munich (1972)’, European Review of History, 15 (2008), 691–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 For a detailed account of the Foro Italico pertaining to the Rome Olympics, see ibid. Modrey has shown how inscription of the fascist area posed problems for the organizing committee, especially after the communist party had protested in the Italian parliament in 1959. A public discussion on the issue followed but the inscriptions remained. Reminders of Mussolini were swept under the proverbial carpet in at least in some cases: for example in the assembly hall of the National Olympic Committee, where a green carpet hid a piece of artwork entitled ‘The Apotheosis of Fascism’ celebrating the Duce. See Maraniss, D., Rome 1960: The Olympics that Changed the World (New York, 2008), 80Google Scholar.

25 Ciucci, G., ‘The classicism of the E 42. Between modernity and tradition’, Assemblage, 8 (1989), 82Google Scholar.

26 Nikkei-shinbun, Monthly Reprint Volume July 1964, 59.

27 Balbier, U., Kalter Krieg auf der Aschenbahn: Der deutsch – deutsche Sport 1950–1972: Eine politische Geschichte (Cold War on the Cindertrack: East/West German Sports 1950–1972: A Political History) (Göttingen, 2006), 209–13Google Scholar.

28 See their contribution to this issue. See also Young, C., ‘Munich 1972. Re-presenting the nation’, in Tomlinson, A. and Young, C. (eds.), National Identity and Global Sports Events. Culture, Politics, and Spectacle in the Olympics and the Football World Cup (Albany, 2006), 117–32Google Scholar, and Balbier, Kalter Krieg, 230–5.

29 Hiller, H., ‘Post-event outcomes and the post-modern turn: the Olympics and urban transformations’, European Sport Management Quarterly, 6 (2006), 317–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Lefebvre, H., The Production of Space (Malden, 1994), 38–41Google Scholar.

31 Cybriwsky, R., Tokyo: The Changing Profile of an Urban Giant (London and New York, 1991), 191Google Scholar.

32 Shintarô Ishihara started as a novelist before turning to politics in the late 1960s. As a hawk in international affairs he advocated a Japanese boycott of the Beijing Olympics 2008.