Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T22:36:56.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Open University and Urban History : A review of two new courses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2009

Extract

The Open University has for some years run an Urban Development Course (DT 201), which Anthony Sutcliffe reviewed favourably in the 1974 Yearbook. His only regret, from an urban historian's perspective, was ‘the almost complete absence of a historical approach’ from the course. He found it depressing that ‘the relevance of urban history to contemporary urban studies is not yet apparent to the great mass of social scientists’. It is therefore good news that in 1977 the O.U. initiated Course A 322, ‘English Urban History 1500–1780’, of which most members of the Urban History Group will be aware from the publicity at Group meetings and from Peter Clark's article in the 1976 Year-book. True, it is an arts rather than a social science course, and so may not entirely meet Anthony Sutcliffe's point; but O.U. policy discourages entry requirements for courses, and A 322 is expected to be taken by social scientists as well as by arts students.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Swierenga, Robert P., ‘Ethnocultural political analysis: a new approach in American ethnic studies’, Journal of American Studies, v (04, 1971), 5979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Katz, Michael, ‘Occupational classification in history’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, iii (Summer, 1972), 6388CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hershberg, Theodore et al. , ‘Occupation and ethnicity in five nineteenth-century cities: a collaborative inquiry’, Historical Methods Newsletter, vii (06, 1974), 174216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar