Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Wilkinson, T. M. 2009. Reason, Paternalism, and Disaster. Res Publica, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 203.


    garren, david j. 2007. PATERNALISM, PART II. Philosophical Books, Vol. 48, Issue. 1, p. 50.


    Clarke, Simon 2006. Debate: State Paternalism, Neutrality and Perfectionism*. Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 111.


    ×

Against Dworkin's Endorsement Constraint

  • T. M. Wilkinson (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800003939
  • Published online: 01 January 2009
Abstract

Ronald Dworkin argues on the basis of a theory of well-being that critical paternalism is self-defeating. People must endorse their lives if they are to benefit. This is the endorsement constraint and this paper rejects it. For certain kinds of important mistakes that people can make in their lives, the endorsement constraint is either incredible or too narrow to rule out as much paternalism as Dworkin wants. The endorsement constraint cannot be interpreted to give sensible judgements when people change their minds about the value of their lives. And the main argument for the endorsement constraint, which is based on the value of integrity, does not support Dworkin's anti-paternalism.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Utilitas
  • ISSN: 0953-8208
  • EISSN: 1741-6183
  • URL: /core/journals/utilitas
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×