Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Bentham on Presumed Offences

  • FREDERICK SCHAUER (a1)
Abstract

In the Principles of the Penal Code, Jeremy Bentham described offences that he labelled presumed or evidentiary. The conduct penalized under such offences is punished not because it is intrinsically wrong, but because it probabilistically indicates the presence of an intrinsic wrong. Bentham was sceptical of the need to create offences, but grudgingly accepted their value in light of deficiencies in procedure and the judiciary. These days the scepticism is even greater, with courts and commentators in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and elsewhere believing that such ‘proxy’ offences deny a defendant the right to establish that he did not engage in the conduct that the presumed offence probabilistically but not necessarily indicates. On closer analysis, however, such scepticism appears unjustified. Almost all offences, and indeed almost all legal rules, are premised on a probabilistic relationship between the behaviour the rule encompasses and the behaviour that is the rule-maker's real concern. Presumed offences may make this relationship especially obvious, but it is a relationship that exists whenever the law operates by the use of rules.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Bentham on Presumed Offences
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Bentham on Presumed Offences
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Bentham on Presumed Offences
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Larry Alexander , ‘Inculpatory and Exculpatory Mistakes and the Fact/Law Distinction: An Essay in Memory of Myke Bayles’, Law and Philosophy 12 (1993), pp. 3367

Larry Alexander and Kimberly D. Kessler , ‘Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 87 (1997), pp. 1138–72

Edna Ullman-Margalit , ‘On Presumption’, Journal of Philosophy 80 (1983), pp. 143–63

Edna Ullman-Margalit and Avishai Margalit , ‘Analyticity by Way of Presumption’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1982), pp. 435–52

John Calvin Jeffries Jr., and Paul B. Stephan III, ‘Defenses, Presumptions, and Burden of Proof in the Criminal Law’, Yale Law Journal 88 (1979), pp. 13251404

Charles Nesson , ‘The Evidence or the Event? On Judicial Proof and the Acceptability of Verdicts’, Harvard Law Review 98 (1985), pp. 1357–92, at 1378–85

James Edwards , ‘Justice Denied: The Criminal Law and the Ouster of the Courts’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2010), pp. 725–48

Victor Tadros , ‘Crimes and Security’, Modern Law Review 71 (2008), pp. 940–70

Meir Dan-Cohen , ‘Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in the Criminal Law’, Harvard Law Review 97 (1984), pp. 625–77

J. O. Urmson , ‘The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J.S. Mill’, Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1953), pp. 33–9

Jonathan Dancy , Ethics without Principles (Oxford, 2004)

Donald H. Regan , Utilitarianism and Co-operation (Oxford, 1980)

J. J. C. Smart , ‘Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism’, Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1956), pp. 344–54

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Utilitas
  • ISSN: 0953-8208
  • EISSN: 1741-6183
  • URL: /core/journals/utilitas
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 15 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 206 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.