Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 14
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Young, Robert 2016. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.

    Bosmans, Kristof and Ooghe, Erwin 2013. A characterization of maximin. Economic Theory Bulletin, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 151.

    Young, Robert 2013. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.

    Alon-Shenker, Pnina 2012. The Unequal Right to Age Equality: Towards a Dignified Lives Approach to Age Discrimination. The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 25, Issue. 02, p. 243.

    Fuller, Lisa L. 2012. Burdened Societies and Transitional Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 369.

    Hirose, Iwao 2011. New Waves in Ethics.

    Rendall, Matthew 2011. Climate Change and the Threat of Disaster: The Moral Case for Taking Out Insurance at Our Grandchildren's Expense. Political Studies, Vol. 59, Issue. 4, p. 884.

    Mason, Andrew 2009. Justice, Holism and Principles. Res Publica, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 179.

    Bou-Habib, Paul 2008. Security, Profiling and Equality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 149.

    Crockett, Rachel Wilkinson, Timothy M. and Marteau, Theresa M. 2008. Social Patterning of Screening Uptake and the Impact of Facilitating Informed Choices: Psychological and Ethical Analyses. Health Care Analysis, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 17.

    STARK, ANDREW 2008. Benefit versus Numbers versus Helping the Worst-off: An Alternative to the Prevalent Approach to the Just Distribution of Resources. Utilitas, Vol. 20, Issue. 03, p. 356.

    Voigt, Kristin 2007. The Harshness Objection: Is Luck Egalitarianism Too Harsh on the Victims of Option Luck?. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 10, Issue. 4, p. 389.

    Benbaji, Yitzhak 2006. Sufficiency or Priority?. European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 327.

    Arneson, Richard J. 2001. Against Rights. Philosophical Issues, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 172.


Equality and Priority

  • Dennis Mckerlie (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2009

Moral egalitarianism will depend on one of two basic ideas. The first is the idea of equality itself. We might believe that it is a good thing if different people have equal shares of resources, or if their lives score equally well in terms of whatever makes lives valuable, at least if there is no reason based on some other moral value for one person to do better than the other. Equality is a relationship between the lives of different people. This version of egalitarianism (I will call it the ‘equality view’) claims that the existence of the relationship makes an outcome better. It attributes value to relations between lives rather than to the content of lives.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0953-8208
  • EISSN: 1741-6183
  • URL: /core/journals/utilitas
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *